Negligence Flashcards
1
Q
Robins
A
Where a duty has been owed in a similar case before, a duty should be applied here
2
Q
Caparo v Dickman
A
I’m novel cases
- was damage foreseeable
- was there proximity
- is it FJR to impose a duty
3
Q
Jolley v Sutton
A
Passed the caparo test
4
Q
Blyth v BW
A
Defines a breach as falling below the standard of care expected by a reasonable person
5
Q
Bolam
A
Profession/ job can raise standard of care
6
Q
Nettleship v Weston
A
Inexperience doesn’t change the standard of cafe
7
Q
Mullin v Richards
A
Age can lower the standard of care
8
Q
Miller v Jackson
A
Size of risk
9
Q
Paris v SBC
A
seriousness of potential harm
10
Q
Latimer v AEC/ Haley v LEB
A
Precautions
11
Q
Watt v HCC
A
Benefit of risk
12
Q
Barnett
A
But for test
13
Q
Reeves v MPC
A
intervening acts (act of victim
14
Q
Wilkin-shaw v Fuller
A
Intervening acts (3rd party)
15
Q
Wagon mound
A
Type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable
