Elements of a crime Paper 1 section B Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by actus reus?

A

‘Guilt act’- the physical part of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of an involuntary act?

A

Where the mind is not in control of the muscles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which case was the definition of an involuntary act given?

A

Bratty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In Hill V Baxter, give 3 examples of what could be an involuntary act when driving

A
  • Swarm of bees
  • Hit on head with rock
  • Heart attack/ epileptic fit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by Omission?

A

Faliure to act?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the general rule for omission and what is the exception?

A

_Generally you are not responsible for a failure to act unless you have a duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 5 types of duty?

A

Contractual, Relationship, Assuming responsibility voluntarily, Public office, Creating a dangerous situation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contractual Duty (Case, brief story, why is was their duty)

A

R v Pittwood
Railway worker left gate open
-It was his job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relationship

A

R v Gibbins and Proctor

  • Starved child
  • He was her father
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assuming responsibility voluntarily

A

R V Stone and Dobinson

  • Ederly sister died of neglect
  • They chose to look after her
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public Office

A

R v Dytham
Police man didn’t stop fight
-Hes a police office- even off hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Creating a dangerous situaltion

A

R v Miller
Started a fire
-He created the fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the test for Factual causation?

A

But for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case do we use for Factual Causation?

A

R v Pagett

-kidnapped pregnant GF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Apply the but for test to Pagett

A

But for D using V as a human shield, V would not have died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the contrasting case for Factual causation

A

R v White- Poisoned mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the test for Legal causation and what does it determine?

A

Operative and Substantial cause test to see if D was a significant cause

18
Q

Which case do we use for Legal Causation

A

R v Smith

- Solider stabbed another, punctured lung

19
Q

What are the 3 types of intervening acts?

A

Acts of the victim
Acts of a 3rd party
Acts of god

20
Q

For intervening acts to break the CoC, they must be…

A

Unreasonable and Unforeseeable

21
Q

What is the extra rule for medical treatment in breaking the CoC and which case shows this rule?

A

Palpably wrong

R v Jordan- given antibiotics +FLuids

22
Q

In R v Pagett, do the acts of the 3rd party break the chain of causation?

A

No because the polices actions were reasonable and foreseeable

23
Q

What 2 cases do we use for ACts of the victim and say whether they victims actions broke the CoC

A

R v Roberts- didnt break CoC, jumped out due to sexual advances

R v Williams- Did break CoC, small threat asking to see wallet

24
Q

What are acts of God

A

Natural and unpredictable events

25
What is the THin SKull Rule and what case do we use?
Any Characteristics which make V more vulnerable/ weak will never break the CoC, R v Blaue - jehovas witness
26
What did the court say in R v Blaue
V Being a jehovas witness doesn't break the CoC and D must take his victim as he finds him
27
What does Mens Rea mean
Guilty Mind
28
2 ways of proving intention
Direct and Oblique
29
What is the definition of Direct Intent and which case shows this?
D's decision or aim to bring about the prohibited consequence Mohan
30
What is Oblique Intention
When we cant prove D was really aiming to bring about the consequence however it was so obvious they may as well have intended it
31
WHat case provides the test for Oblique intention (and what is the tests)
Woollin- throwing baby 1. Is the consequence virtually certain 2. Did D know the consequence was virtually certain
32
WHat was the decision made in R v Woollin
Not Oblique intention as D Didnt know consequence was virtually certain or they wouldnt have thrown baby
33
What other case do we use for oBlique intention + the outcome
Matthew and Alleyne Threw V into river Passes both Woollin test as they knew V couldn't swim
34
What is the definition/ test for recklessness
V realises theres a risk but continues regardless
35
WHich case gave us the test for recklessness and why is it hard to prove intention
R v CUnningham- ripped out gas meter to get coins -Didnt have direct intention to harm anyone but hard to prove oblique as D wasnt certain of consequence due to lack of knowledge
36
What is meant bt transferred malice and which case did it work in
When mens rea can be transferred from intended V to actual V R v Latimer- hit with belt
37
What case do we use for when transfer of malice couldnt work and why
R v Pemblinton Threw stone at people, smashed window -Didn't intend criminal damage to cant be transferred malice as didn't have the mens rea
38
WHat is meant be coincidence?
For a crime there must be the Actus reus and mens rea and they must be present at the same time
39
What 2 things can we use when the MR and AR dont naturally coincide?
Single transaction theory | Continuing act
40
Explain SIngle TRansaction Theory and the case used
When the mens rea occurs before the AR, the MR can be extended over all acts in a chain of events R v Thabo meli- kidnapped guy
41
Explain Continuing acts and the case example used
When the AR occurs before the MR, the AR can continue until the MR takes place Fagan v MPC- Drive over police officer foot