Elements of a crime Paper 1 section B Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is meant by actus reus?

A

‘Guilt act’- the physical part of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of an involuntary act?

A

Where the mind is not in control of the muscles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which case was the definition of an involuntary act given?

A

Bratty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In Hill V Baxter, give 3 examples of what could be an involuntary act when driving

A
  • Swarm of bees
  • Hit on head with rock
  • Heart attack/ epileptic fit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by Omission?

A

Faliure to act?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the general rule for omission and what is the exception?

A

_Generally you are not responsible for a failure to act unless you have a duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 5 types of duty?

A

Contractual, Relationship, Assuming responsibility voluntarily, Public office, Creating a dangerous situation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contractual Duty (Case, brief story, why is was their duty)

A

R v Pittwood
Railway worker left gate open
-It was his job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relationship

A

R v Gibbins and Proctor

  • Starved child
  • He was her father
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assuming responsibility voluntarily

A

R V Stone and Dobinson

  • Ederly sister died of neglect
  • They chose to look after her
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public Office

A

R v Dytham
Police man didn’t stop fight
-Hes a police office- even off hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Creating a dangerous situaltion

A

R v Miller
Started a fire
-He created the fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the test for Factual causation?

A

But for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case do we use for Factual Causation?

A

R v Pagett

-kidnapped pregnant GF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Apply the but for test to Pagett

A

But for D using V as a human shield, V would not have died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the contrasting case for Factual causation

A

R v White- Poisoned mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the test for Legal causation and what does it determine?

A

Operative and Substantial cause test to see if D was a significant cause

18
Q

Which case do we use for Legal Causation

A

R v Smith

- Solider stabbed another, punctured lung

19
Q

What are the 3 types of intervening acts?

A

Acts of the victim
Acts of a 3rd party
Acts of god

20
Q

For intervening acts to break the CoC, they must be…

A

Unreasonable and Unforeseeable

21
Q

What is the extra rule for medical treatment in breaking the CoC and which case shows this rule?

A

Palpably wrong

R v Jordan- given antibiotics +FLuids

22
Q

In R v Pagett, do the acts of the 3rd party break the chain of causation?

A

No because the polices actions were reasonable and foreseeable

23
Q

What 2 cases do we use for ACts of the victim and say whether they victims actions broke the CoC

A

R v Roberts- didnt break CoC, jumped out due to sexual advances

R v Williams- Did break CoC, small threat asking to see wallet

24
Q

What are acts of God

A

Natural and unpredictable events

25
Q

What is the THin SKull Rule and what case do we use?

A

Any Characteristics which make V more vulnerable/ weak will never break the CoC,
R v Blaue - jehovas witness

26
Q

What did the court say in R v Blaue

A

V Being a jehovas witness doesn’t break the CoC and D must take his victim as he finds him

27
Q

What does Mens Rea mean

A

Guilty Mind

28
Q

2 ways of proving intention

A

Direct and Oblique

29
Q

What is the definition of Direct Intent and which case shows this?

A

D’s decision or aim to bring about the prohibited consequence

Mohan

30
Q

What is Oblique Intention

A

When we cant prove D was really aiming to bring about the consequence however it was so obvious they may as well have intended it

31
Q

WHat case provides the test for Oblique intention (and what is the tests)

A

Woollin- throwing baby

  1. Is the consequence virtually certain
  2. Did D know the consequence was virtually certain
32
Q

WHat was the decision made in R v Woollin

A

Not Oblique intention as D Didnt know consequence was virtually certain or they wouldnt have thrown baby

33
Q

What other case do we use for oBlique intention + the outcome

A

Matthew and Alleyne
Threw V into river
Passes both Woollin test as they knew V couldn’t swim

34
Q

What is the definition/ test for recklessness

A

V realises theres a risk but continues regardless

35
Q

WHich case gave us the test for recklessness and why is it hard to prove intention

A

R v CUnningham- ripped out gas meter to get coins
-Didnt have direct intention to harm anyone but hard to prove oblique as D wasnt certain of consequence due to lack of knowledge

36
Q

What is meant bt transferred malice and which case did it work in

A

When mens rea can be transferred from intended V to actual V

R v Latimer- hit with belt

37
Q

What case do we use for when transfer of malice couldnt work and why

A

R v Pemblinton
Threw stone at people, smashed window
-Didn’t intend criminal damage to cant be transferred malice as didn’t have the mens rea

38
Q

WHat is meant be coincidence?

A

For a crime there must be the Actus reus and mens rea and they must be present at the same time

39
Q

What 2 things can we use when the MR and AR dont naturally coincide?

A

Single transaction theory

Continuing act

40
Q

Explain SIngle TRansaction Theory and the case used

A

When the mens rea occurs before the AR, the MR can be extended over all acts in a chain of events

R v Thabo meli- kidnapped guy

41
Q

Explain Continuing acts and the case example used

A

When the AR occurs before the MR, the AR can continue until the MR takes place

Fagan v MPC- Drive over police officer foot