Nearly Losing an Empire: India 1829-1858 Flashcards
What happened in 1757?
The Battle of Plassey resulted in the East India Company under Robert Clive gaining ascendency.
What regulations were placed on the EIC by the British government between 1773 and 1786?
-The Tea Act was meant to prevent the EIC going bankrupt but required greater regulation of the Company under the Regulation Act 1773
-Establishment of the Board of Control in 1784
-Governor General nominated by Company but decided by the Board of Control by 1786
When was the EIC monopoly on trade removed?
-Charter Act 1813 ended the EIC monopoly on trade except for tea and china
-Charter Act 1833 saw a complete end to the EIC commercial monopoly
How did free trade change the functions of the EIC in the early 19th century?
As the company’s commercial monopoly had ended by 1833, the EIC changed function from commerce to administration, primarily through their new role as tax collectors. British representatives in India were now more involved in local administration than ever and now saw themselves as rulers rather than simply engaging in commercial activity. It made sense for local rulers to ally themselves with the British to ensure protection from other rulers and to ensure the smooth collection of taxes from their subjects. An army of civil servants came into the Company employment to oversee the collection of taxes, supported by the Company’s armies when necessary.
How useful was India under EIC rule?
Taxation raised £18 million a year in the early 1800s, a third of the peacetime revenue of Britain itself. Although India was about as valuable a trading partner as Jersey, it had a growing narcotics empire that could be useful.
How important was Bengal to the EIC?
It was the most important presidency in the Company in the 19th century and its President was the governor general of all the territory controlled by the EIC following the passing of the Government of India Act 1833. The administrative structure of Bengal was developed under the governor generalship of Lord Cornwallis (1786-93) and Calcutta was the administrative and judicial centre of India (and capital) until 1911.
How important was the Bengal army?
The army of the Bengal presidency was twice the size of the other two armies and was recruited mainly from the higher castes. As the principal army of the company, they played a pivotal role in the annexation of the Punjab.
How large was the Company army in 1820?
There were 3 private armies based in the 3 presidencies and by 1820, troops numbered 200,000.
How did the Company army develop?
The increased focus on training military personnel reflected the changing company focus to civil administration. From the mid 18th century there were also a small number of British army regiments dispatched from Britain. By 1857, there were 45,000 European soldiers out of a total of 277,000 soldiers (the rest being sepoys).
How did the Company territory grow?
The strength and increasing professionalism of the army meant that British territory in India increased to 243,000km2 by 1800 as successive governors (notably Wellesley) sought to increase Company territory and eradicate any pockets of remaining French influence in the subcontinent. Expansion largely took place in the west where there was some Russian influence (easier than east with French and Dutch empires and Himalayas blocked northern expansion).
Which territories did the Company successfully annex?
Successfully annexed Assam, Manipur and Cacher between 1823 and 1826. Sind was annexed in 1843.
Which territories were not successfully annexed?
The Afghan War 1838-1842 cost India 20,000 lives and £15 million. Conquering the Punjab took most of the 1840s until it was brought under British control by 1849. Additionally, these campaigns limited company profits as these had to be funded through taxation.
Why was the Company able to grow its territory successfully?
-Growth of the army and increased focus on training
-Defeat in Afghanistan made the Company determined to secure Sind and the Punjab in compensatory conquest
-The Company was able to successfully exploit the complicated local tensions to expand its presence in the subcontinent, e.g. in gaining the support of the Sikhs during the Indian rebellion
How did the British change the traditional caste system?
The untouchables and low-caste Indians enjoyed an improvement of their social standings. The mingling of different castes increased and the newly educated and affluent middle class in the cities mixed socially with people based on their financial position and class, not caste. By the end of the Raj, traditional Indian society began to break down into a westernised class system. A strong middle class evolved out of the caste system, allowing men of low castes to rise to high ranks and positions of power previously closed to them.
How did the British not change the traditional caste system?
The British actually gave the Brahmins back certain special privileges which had been withdrawn from them under Muslim rule. The degree to which the caste system was successfully challenged by British rule is questionable, as though they are now prohibited by Indian law, they have not totally vanished in practice today.
What was the campaign against thagi?
William Sleeman led the campaign against thagi after capturing a thagi (Feringhea) in 1835. Feringhea confessed and described the practices of the secret network to Sleeman, who devoted himself to its eradication. The Thugge and Dacoity Department was created in 1835, with Sleeman as its first superintendent.
What happened during the campaign against thagi?
A vigorous and highly publicised campaign ensued in which more than 1000 thagi were transported or hanged for their crimes and 3000 were tried and punished in total. The campaign was based on capturing thagi and using their confessions to track down and capture others.
How successful was the campaign against thagi?
Thagi activity seemed to have been largely dealt with by Sleeman’s efforts in the 1830s and crucially, thagi suppression didn’t seem to have been widely resented by Indians at the time, unlike other campaigns from the modernising agenda.
How was sati dealt with originally by the EIC?
Company officials had disliked the practice and had tried to discourage it, but there were serious concerns about the impact of such a ban on the local population. However, the practice had been banned in Calcutta in 1798 and Wilberforce forced amendment to the 1813 Charter Law to allow missionaries to preach against sati.
What happened in the campaign against sati?
The Act of Abolition 1829 outlawed sati in areas under Company control and anyone guilty assisting with a sati was deemed to be guilty of culpable homicide and prosecuted. The practice was outlawed in the entirety of India in 1861.