NDA Submission Process Flashcards

1
Q

New Drug Application (NDA)

A

505(b)(1) and 505(b)(2) applications have different content, but their format and review process are the generally the same except for M4

The NDA application is drug sponsors request FDA to approve a new pharmaceutical for sale and marketing in the US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Biological License Application (BLA)

A

Section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act is the main pathway for this approval, requiring full safety and efficacy data
-Previously, this license involved
two separate applications: the
Product License Application
(PLA) and the Establishment
License Application (ELA)
-For BLAs there is a strong focus
on the production facilities due
to the unique nature of the
products

BLA is how biologic and biotech sponsors ask the FDA to approve a new biological product for sale in the US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Both the NDA and BLA must provide evidence:

A

-Drug/Biologic is safe and effective
-Benefits of the drug outweigh the risks
-manufacturing process and quality controls for the drug/biologic are sufficient to ensure the product’s identity, strength, quality, and purity are maintained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

A

products are reviewed by therapeutic area (e.g. Hepatology, Cardiology, Oncology products)
-Office of New Drugs includes eight review offices with 27 review divisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) -

A

products are reviewed according to product type (e.g. blood products)
-Therapeutic Biologics are reviewed by CDER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Application Types

A

CDER will review both NDA and BLA (Therapeutic Biologic)

CBER will review BLA for vaccines and other biologics

NDA and BLAs must be submitted as eCTD Follows ICH M4 Organization of the CTD
-US Specifications and Guidance for eCTD
-Data must be submitted electronically per current Data Standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Therapeutic Biologics

A

Therapeutic biologics requirements for commercialization are the same as those for drug products

Follow NDA (21 CFR 314) regulations as well as BLA (21CFR601)

Same reporting and documentation requirements
-NDA/BLA, safety update reports, annual reports; post-marketing requirements
-Additional post-marketing reporting requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CTD Guidance focuses on

A

how to organize and format documents and data, not on the scientific and technical content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Scientific and technical requirements are covered by

A

ICH technical guidelines (Q, S, E)
Relevant laws, regulations, and guidance documents of each region or country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

NDA/BLA Review Paradigms

A

-FDA performs a “bottom up review”
-Data and documents reviewed in total for each module
-Need to support statements and conclusions in the summary and label
-Example: Clinical studies
Each study report is evaluated
individually based on its
objectives and is supported in US
FDA submissions (NDA/BLA) by
-Text, Tables/Listings/Figures
-Data sets
-Case report forms
-Integrated summaries (ISE/ISS)
and
-Clinical summaries and overview
-End with the label

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

M 1: US – Items Included in NDA/BLA

A

-Cover letter,
-Forms: 356h, 3674, User Fee
-Table of Contents
-Draft Labeling
-Proposed Container Labeling
-Annotated Labeling Text
-Labeling Comparison*
-Risk Management Plans
-Patent Information
-Patent Certification*
*Applies only to ANDA and 505(b)(2) applications
-Debarment Certification
-Field Copy Certification
-User Fee Cover Sheet
-Financial Disclosure/Certification -Information-
-Letters of Authorization for FDA reference
-Environmental Assessment or -Claim for Categorical Exclusion
-Statements of claimed exclusivity
-Waiver requests (if applicable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

For NDA/BLA, this form only needs to be included in initial submission or with efficacy supplements

A

Form FDA 3674

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Form FDA 356h

A

-Application to Market a New or Abbreviated New Drug or Biologic for Human Use
-Includes US-specific administrative information and data on page 1
-Includes list of items required by the regulations on page 2; applicant checks those that apply to the NDA/BLA
-Commits to inspection readiness and to comply with all applicable regulations
-Signature of sponsor’s “responsible official” or authorized agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 1- Index

A

-Comprehensive table of contents of application indexing the documents
21 CFR §314.50 & ICH Guidances
-In an eCTD the table of contents will be the XML backbone file

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 2 - Labeling (CTD 1.14.1)

A

-Prescribing Information (package insert)
Copies of all proposed labels and labeling
Content discussed in another session
-Proposed labeling content in SPL format
-Annotated labeling (in Word and PDF)
-Annotations direct reviewer to information in summaries and reports that support statements in the proposed labeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NDA/BLA can claim Categorical Exclusion from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment IF

A

the estimated concentration of the substance at the point of entry into the aquatic environment is < 1 part per billion (ppb)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 3 – Summaries (CTD M2.3,2.4 and 2.5)

A

Item 3 Summary sections are satisfied by the CTD Module 2 Overviews
-Chemistry Summary – Quality Overall Summary (CTD
Module 2.3)
-Nonclinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Summary (CTD
Module 2.4)
- Clinical and Statistical Summaries Data (CTD Module 2.5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Overviews vs. Summaries

A

Overview: broad critical analysis of the data
Analogous to the Discussion section of a scientific publication

Summary: detailed factual summary of all the information provided in the CTD
Analogous to the Results section of a scientific publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Module 2.3Quality Overall Summary (QOS)

A

-Follows the scope & outline of Module 3
-Provides CMC Reviewer with an Overview and Summary of Module 3
-Emphasizes critical key parameters
-Includes a discussion of key issues that integrates information from the Quality Module to the other Modules including cross-referencing to the other Modules
-Normally text should not exceed 40 pages (NCE) or 80 pages (biotech), excluding tables and figures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Module 2.4 Nonclinical Overview

A

Overview of Nonclinical Testing Strategy
Pharmacology
Pharmacokinetics
Toxicology
Integrated Overview and Conclusions
List of Literature Citations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Module 2.6 Nonclinical Summary

A

Introduction
Pharmacology
-Written Summary
-Tabulated Summary
Pharmacokinetics
-Written Summary
-Tabulated Summary
Toxicology
-Written Summary
-Tabulated Summary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Module 2.5 Clinical Overview

A

Product Development Rationale
Overview of Biopharmaceutics
Overview of Clinical Pharmacology
Overview of Efficacy
Overview of Safety
Benefits and Risks Conclusions
List of References

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Module 2.7 Clinical Summary

A

Summary of Biopharmaceutic Studies and Associated
Analytical Methods
Summary of Clinical Pharmacology Studies
Summary of Clinical Efficacy
Summary of Clinical Safety
References
Synopses of Individual Studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

NDA/BLA 356h Form Items 4-10 (CTD M2-5)

A

Referred to as Technical Sections in many of the FDA Guidelines, now as Modules for CTD format
-Chemistry (356h Item 4A - CTD Module 3) – other lectures
-Nonclinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (356h Item 5- CTD Module 4) – requires datasets per CDISC SEND
-Human Pharmacokinetics & Bioavailability (356h Item 6 - CTD Module 5)
-Clinical Microbiology (356h Item 7 - CTD Module 5)
-Clinical Data (356h Item 8 - CTD Module 5)
-Safety Update (356h Item 9 – CTD Module 5)
-Statistical (356h Item 10 - CTD Module 5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
CTD Module 4- Safety/Nonclinical
Table of contents Study Reports -Pharmacology -Animal Pharmacokinetics -Toxicology -Local Tolerance -Other Studies Literature References
26
CTD - Module 5 – Efficacy/Clinical
5.1 Table of Contents for Clinical Study Reports and Related Information 5.2 Tabular Listing of all Clinical Studies 5.3 Clinical Study Reports and Related Information 5.3.6 Reports of Post-marketing Experience (including all significant safety observations) 5.3.7 Case Report Forms and Individual Listings (case report tabulations) Located with the study reports and accessed via a study tagging file (more on this later) 5.4 Literature References
27
5.3 Clinical Study Reports
-Study Reports of Controlled Clinical Studies Pertinent to the Claimed Indication -Study Reports of Uncontrolled Clinical Studies -Reports of Analyses of Data from more than One Study (including any formal integrated analyses, meta-analyses and bridging analyses) -Other Study Reports
28
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 11- Case Report Tabulations (CTD M5 Clinical Study Reports)
-Tabulations of individual patient data from all clinical studies required (per 21 CFR 314.50(f)(1) this is safety data but in reality, all data) -Case report tabulations (all individual patient data) are submitted electronically as datasets (SAS Transport files) and referenced from/with CSR -Datasets MUST be submitted per CDISC Standards (SDTM and ADaM) -Discuss at pre-NDA meeting if there are questions
29
356h Form Item 12 - Case Report Forms (CTD M5 Clinical Study Reports)
-CRFs are submitted as PDF files regardless of whether they were paper or electronic Audit trail or Data Edit Documentation required -After initial NDA/BLA – must submit any other CRFs that FDA requests within 30 days
30
CRFs required in initial NDA/BLA for
1.Each patient who died during a clinical study, and 2.Each patient who dropped out a study due to an AE, whether believed to be drug-related or not -including patients receiving comparative drugs or placebo 3.Discuss need for additional CRFs at pre-NDA meeting
31
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 13- Patent Information (CTD 1.3.5.1)
1. Must list all patents that claim the drug substance, product or method of use for the drug to be listed by FDA -Information published by FDA in Orange Book (Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations) 2. Submit on Form FDA 3542a Patent Information Submitted With the Filing of An NDA, Amendment, or Supplement
32
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 14-Patent Certification (CTD 1.3.5.2)
1. Only applies to 505(b)(2) and 505(j) 2. Must certify to lack of, expiration of, non-infringement of, or invalidity of any patents not owned by applicant -314.94(a)(12) -No form exists, just written certification
33
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 15-Establishment Information
BLAs are subject to additional regulations (21CFRPart 600): Subpart B--Establishment Standards    § 600.10 - Personnel.    § 600.11 - Physical establishment, equipment, animals, and care.    § 600.12 - Records.    § 600.13 - Retention samples.    § 600.14 - Reporting of biological product deviations by licensed manufacturers.    § 600.15 - Temperatures during shipment. Subpart C--Establishment Inspection    § 600.20 - Inspectors    § 600.21 - Time of inspection.    § 600.22 - Duties of inspector. Filed with 356h form and M3
34
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 16-Debarment Certification (CTD 1.3.3)
Certification that applicant did not and will not use services of any person or firm who has been debarred under the Generic Drug Enforcement Act of 1992 in connection with the application -Required for all NDAs and BLAs, not just ANDAs
35
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 17- Field Copy Certification (CTD 1.3.2)
1.Not required in electronic submission -District Office will have access to the entire submission 2.Legacy purpose was to certify that the copy of Modules 1,2 & 3 sent to FDA District Office is true and accurate copy of those sections included in the NDA/BLA
36
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 18- User Fee Cover Sheet
Documents payment of PDUFA application fee – by wire transfer See FDA website for directions on completing user fee cover sheet (Form FDA 3397) online
37
NDA/BLA 356h Form Item 19-Financial Disclosure Information(CTD 1.3.4)
For trials covered by 21 CFR 54, certification of: Investigators with no financial disclosures (Form 3454) Investigators with financial disclosures (Form 3455) For trials that included investigators with disclosures, must explain measures taken to minimize potential bias Forms FDA 3454 and 3455
38
Investigators with no financial disclosures form number
Form 3454
39
Investigators with financial disclosures
Form 3455
40
356h Form Item 20 Other – Use for Proposed Proprietary/Trade Name (CTD 1.18)
-This should be done during the IND phase -FDA reviews proposed trade names for the potential for product mix-ups or other confusion that could lead to medication errors Part of safety risk assessment of product -Sponsor can get feedback from FDA on choice of trade name
41
356h Form Item 20 Other – Pediatric Plan
Per the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), a sponsor who will be submitting an NDA or BLA is required to submit an initial Pediatric Study Plan (PSP) within 60 calendar days after the date of the end-of-Phase 2 meeting or such other time as may be agreed upon between the Secretary and the applicant -includes a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen, or new route of administration (21 USC 355c(a) and (e))
42
The initial PSP must include
-an outline of the pediatric study or studies that the applicant plans to conduct Including study objectives and design, age groups, relevant endpoints, and statistical approach); -Any request for a deferral, partial waiver, or waiver, if applicable goes in Module 1
43
US Specific Content for m3 and m4
1. Module 3 Impurities Methods and Process Validation Executed batch records 2. Module 4 Nonclinical datasets (SAS xpt) Per CDISC SEND model Carcinogenicity and/or Repeat Dose Toxicity
44
US Specific Content for m6
1. CRTs and CRFS – discussed above 2. Integrated Summaries for Efficacy and Safety (ISE and ISS) - (meta) analyses for efficacy and safety Normally these are placed in M5.3.5.3 However a separate ISE and/or ISS may not be required when the information can be incorporated into Module 2.7.3 and 2.7.4 Rare Diseases/Orphan Drugs Refer to FDA Guidance in eCTD area of website 3. Discuss plans with FDA at pre-NDA/BLA meeting
45
NDA/BLA Electronic Submission Process
1Electronic transmission - through the Electronic Submission Gateway (ESG) 2.For applications > 10 GB, may also submit physical media to the Central Document Room, Beltsville, MD
46
NDA/BLA Submission Process
1.Content PLANNING is KEY *Understand US Requirements *Inventory product information *Assign accountability 2.Allow for adequate TIME *Authoring, review and approval *Quality assurance on documents and data *Compilation and publishing 2.Communicate with Stakeholders
47
Electronic Submission Gateway (ESG)
1.FDA’s central point for accepting secure electronic submissions via Internet 2.Automated validation; staff do not open or review submissions 3.Route validated submission to correct Center or Office for review
48
FDA Submission Process Two types of validation
1.Technical When using ESG - Automated Validation tool Identifies and rates the severity of any errors found for reviewability of the electronic submission Runs a check of file formats, bookmarks and hypertext links 2. Manual Division quality checks on content are done within 45/60 day “window” for the purposes of FILING; official start of clock occurs after this is complete TOC, Datasets, Missing Information/Files
49
ESG process
1. Enables use of e-mail with link to submission, logs and codes submission into DARRTS (Document Archiving Reporting Regulatory Tracking System) 2. FDA Regulatory Project Manager (RPM) receives both e-mail and DARRTS inbox notice, clicks on links in DARRTS, and assigns submission to reviewers(s) 3. Assigned reviewers receive both e-mail and DARRTS inbox notice and can then access submission directly
50
FDA Review Process
1. Accept the NDA/BLA for Filing -File or refuse to file (RTF) -Determination made by 45/60 days The application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review RTF Reasons Missing sections, missing datasets or missing required studies or required certifications Lack of organization per Guidance Does not contain an English translation of parts of the NDA/BLA Datasets not per standards 3. Review the application (if filed) Different Review Timelines Priority Review vs. Standard Technical reviews performed by Review Team Communications with sponsor Advisory committee decision 4. Agency Action Approval Complete Response
51
NDA/BLA Review Types
1.Standard (S) or Priority (P) review from date of filing (not submission) 2.Classified by the review Division within 60 days after receipt of the application -Applicant will receive the classification in filing letter 3.While FDA makes determination at the time of filing, applicant can provide scientific rationale for priority review in NDA cover letter
52
Standard (S) or Priority (P) review from date of filing (not submission) review time
Standard Review = 10 months Priority Review = 6 months
53
Priority Review
An NDA/BLA application (or efficacy supplement) for a drug or biologic that treats a serious condition AND if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness A few types of applications automatically qualify for priority review by statute EX: Qualified Infectious Disease Product
54
FDA Review of the Application
Good Review Management Principles and Practices for New Drug Applications and Biologics License Applications -Guidance to provide recommendations to industry and review staff on good review management principles and practices (GRMPs) for the review of NDAs, BLAs, or efficacy supplements/supplements with clinical data -For FDA review staff; describes planning and conducting review, factors to consider
55
Additional Requirements
Drug establishment registration information -Allows FDA to identify all manufacturing facilities involved in producing drugs that are in commercial distribution in the US Drug listing information -Helps FDA maintain a catalog of all drugs in commercial distribution in the US
56
Drug Product Listing
Owners/operators of registered establishmentS must submit list of every drug in commercial distribution within 5 days of beginning the manufacturing or processing of drugs and biological products Updates must be submitted every subsequent June and December or, at the discretion of the registrant, when any change occurs
57
Pre-Approval inspection (PAI)
1.Sponsor’s manufacturing facilities Verify the accuracy and completeness of the manufacturing information Evaluate manufacturing controls and pre-approval batches Evaluate cGMP Collect samples for analysis including method validation and verification 2.Clinical trial sites
58
FDA Actions
1.Issue Approval letter (314.105) 2.Issue Complete Response (Action) letter (314.110) 3.Reasons for Refusal to Approve an NDA (314.125) 4.Common reasons include CMC – specifications, manufacturing (GMP), device (if applicable) Clinical – data issues, not following GCP Safety concerns – nonclinical or clinical
59
Issue Approval letter (314.105)
Enables commercial distribution as of date of approval letter
60
Issue Complete Response (Action) letter (314.110)
1Letter describes why the Agency will not approve the application in its present form for one or more reasons 2.Applicant must take action: Resubmission addressing deficiencies Withdrawal of application Request opportunity for hearing to discuss further steps
61
Amendment
Amendment – FDA’s request for more information Not the same as a supplement
62
Resubmission Response
to the deficiencies in Action letter