nature vs nurture: are criminals born? Flashcards
Nature?
while we recognise genetic influences on physical characteristics shared between family members, to what extent might our genetics shape behavioural patterns and more specifically, what role could genetic factors play in understanding criminal behaviour
a study of newborns
female infants spent more time looking at a social object but males stared more at physical objects, at this age sex differences are consistent with a biological cause
sheldon’s somatotypes
endomorph(plus sized) mesomorph (athletic) ectomorph(flat physique) most offenders tended towards mesomorphy and because the youths came from parents who were offenders, the factors that produce criminal behaviour are inherited.
some issues
the comparison between criminals and non criminals is misleading, failure to recognise the wide range of environmental factors as a cause of crime
nurture
differences that emerge later in life are the result of differential exposure to environmental factors
social learning theories
suggests that humans learn through social interactions and tend to mimic the behaviours of others. differential association theory- criminal acts are learned in interactions with our intimiate personal groups
environmental factors
Individuals are prone to criminal behaviour if they frequently interact with others who condone such conduct, as opposed to associating with law-abiding individuals who denounce crime. social institutions are capable of nurturing or reducing criminality
conclusion
both genetics and environment play a part in the formation of any behavioural traits; both nature and nurture are important to eventual behaviour.