Nature v Nurture Flashcards
Nature
People behave the way they do because they are animals who act in accordance with their animal instincts and are determined by their biology.
Nurture
People behave the way they do because they are determined by the things other people teach them, the things are determined to observe around them, and because of the different situations they are put in.
Background to Nature
- Nativist, Biology, physiology, Genetics and Evolutionary Theory
- Behaviour is caused by genetic determinism, inherited influence, hormones, brain activity
- Can’t change behaviour/Eugenics
- Reductionist
- Scans, Experiments, DNA, Twin and Adoption
Background to Nurture
- Empiricism philosophy, behaviourism, social psychology
- The mind is ‘tabula rasa’ at birth, knowledge and behaviour are the result of experience and learning from the environment
- Can change, be prevented and treated
- Reductionist
- Case Studies, Feild E, US interviews
Interactionism
- Widely accepted that heredity and the environment do not act indepenedntly and both nature and nurture are essential for almost all behaviour
- Instead of extreme nativist and environmentalist views, most are interested in investigating why nature and nurture interact
- The interactionist approach is the view that both nature and nurture work together to shape human behaviour
- Diathesis-Stress Model
Diathesis-Stress Model
- Diathesis: Vulnerability to Psychological Disorders= Genetic inheritance, biological processes, brain abnormalities or NT problems and early learning experiences
- Environmental Stressors: Noxious physical stressors, relationship problems, traumas, abuse, neglect
Social Psychology Key Assumptions
- Our roles in society influence our behaviours
- The group we are a part of influences our behaviour
- The situation we are in influences behaviours
Social Psychology: Agency Theory and Social Impact Theory
- ) AT: Tendency to obey due to evolution as it aids survival as society works in a hierarchy (Nature) / AF present in the environment and based on the situation you are in (Nurture)
- ) SIT: Being out-numbered or of low status causes submission through obeying to aid survival (Nature)/ Number, prox and power are social factors (Nurture)
Social Psychology: Realistic Conflict Theory and Social Identity Theory
- ) SIT: Want to belong to a group, social animals, aids survival in evolution forms a social identity. In nature process to use comparison to maintain self-esteem (nature) / Presence of another group in a social situation causes prejudice (Nurture)
- ) RCT: Form groups to survive, competition is a natural part of the evolution as it aids survival when limited resources/Limited resources and sero sums fates are all environment
Social Psychology: Sherif
- Forming groups is a natural tendency as it aids survival (Nature)
- Sherif changed the environment in stages through the introduction of competition with games like baseball
- Changing friendship levels as a measure of prejudice as a social factor. For example, he scored their outgroup friendships at the end of the friction and integration phases and found the Rattlers went from 6.4% to 36.4%. (Nurture)
Social Psychology Debate Evaluation
- Field Experiments (Sheriff) are high in ecological validity in which behaviour will reflect real life and as a result, as it is more suitable in explaining behaviour as nature/nurture as it maintains control over some variables
- Lab Experiments (Milgram) operationalises abstract concepts (prejudice, obedience) as things like an increase in voltage of electric shock administered which is highly scientific but lacks the detail necessary for understanding the complexity of behaviour
- Social psychology assumes the behaviour is mostly due to nurture so any undesirable behaviours can be changed
- Field has low internal validity, Lab have high R but low task validity
- Milgram’s ‘Ordinary Man’ variation found that 80% of ppts left the experiment once the Confederate suggested they increase the shock level showing that environmental factors affect obedience, so nurture
Cognitive Key Assumptions
- Human Brian functions like a computer
- Brain processes information in a linear fashion
- Nature and Nurture interact
Cog: MSM and WMM
- ) MSM: Memory is universal (Nature) but the rehearsal is dictated by the environment on is in (Nurture). Peterson and Peterson=ppts were told to remember nonsense trigrams (e.g. BNV) and they found that after 3s 80% of trigrams were recalled but after 18 seconds less than 10%. Therefore this supports the existence of rehearsal aiding memory during the 3 s and the process of decay after an extended period at 18s.
- ) WMM: Memory is universal but memory impairment occurs when two pieces of info using the same type of encoding occur from the environment. Seltz and Schumann-Hengsteler (2000) Ppts carried out simple maths sums that were disrupted by visual and sound interference tasks and they found that only sound tasks caused impairment. Suggests that visual and verbal information are processed separately and that two tasks in one slave system cause impairment.
Cog: Schema Theory and Brain Damage
- ) Schema Theory: Reconstruction of past events is a process that involves cognition and takes place in our brains (nature). Schemas are formed based on the environment and our experiences in our environment.
- ) Brain Damage: Impairment of memory can be a result of damage to areas of the brain that is involved in memory (hippocampus). Dyslexia can affect memory. Impairment in their phonological loop which slows down the processing of words due to not being able to subvocally rehearse and so the capacity of their STM may be lower. In primary dyslexia, much research focuses on hereditary factors. Researchers have recently identified specific genes identified as possibly contributing to the signs and symptoms of dyslexia. (Nature). Brain damage can be caused by the environment, such as an accident. KF’s case study supports. He suffered STM impairment due to a motorbike accident and had a digit span of one (Nurture)
Cog: Baddeley
(Nature) Memory is universal. Therefore encoding in the STM being acoustic and encoding of the LTM being semantic. It is the same for everyone. Around 40% of people recalled acoustically similar words correctly in trial 2 compared to 60% for acoustically dissimilar words. Around 50% of semantically similar words were recalled in trial 4 compared to 85% of semantically dissimilar which was a significant difference.
(Nurture) Acoustically and semantically similar words differ between culture and languages. So differing sounds are caused by the environment.