Nature of partnerships Flashcards

1
Q

s1(1) PA 1890

A

A partnership is the relation which subsists between persons carrying out a business in common with a view of profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does a business connote?

A

A continuing activity involving a series of commercial transactions which, if successful, result in a profit for participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mann v D’ Arcy 1968

A

A single transaction or venture can still constitute a business or trade, such as a one-off purchase of goods and services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Khan and another v Miah and another

A
  • Partners had to prepare for business by acquiring premises, securing planning consent and putting their affairs in order to enable them to carry on business as restaurateurs
  • Court held that even prior to starting trade, the partners were involved in commercial activity with a view to starting profit and so it was a joint venture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Christie Owen and Davies plc v Raobgle Trust Corporation 2011

A

Held that a partnership was in existence when the partners purchased premises for future development as a restaurant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Saywell v Pope 1979

A

The receipt of a share of profits does not automatically make people partners when individuals behave as though they’re not partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Re Fisher and Sons 1912

A

When defining ‘carried out in common’, it is important to consider the ultimate beneficial interest of the profits generated, like here when executors continued the business of the deceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does there have to be an intention to share profits between the partners?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stekel v Ellice 1973

A

A person receiving a salary could still be a partner if other factors made such a designation appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cox v Hickman 1860

A

If other factors suggest that there is no partnership, the receipt of profits can be easily rebutted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly