Nature of memory A01 and A03 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Nature of memory

What is the duration of STM?

A

18 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Nature of memory

What is the capacity of STM

A

7+- 2 chunks of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nature of memory

What is the coding for STM?

A

Acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nature of memory

What is the duration of LTM?

A

Few minutes to a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Nature of memory

What is the capacity of LTM?

A

Limitless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nature of memory

How is LTM coded?

A

Semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nature of memory

STM CAPACITY, how is it measured? Explain test

A

Immediate digit span test.

List of random disgusts read out and ps have to repeat them back in correct order.

The sequence length where they are correct 50% of the time is their immediate digit span.

Miller claimed this was 7+-2 chunks of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Nature of memory

What can improve the capacity of our STM?

A

Chunking

Occurs when we combine individual letters into a larger, meaningful unit.

Example:
Unchunked = B M W N H S F B I B B C

Chunked = BMW NHS FBI BBC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nature of memory

How did Conrad demonstrate that coding in STM is acoustic?

A

Conrad found that rhyming letters (c p g e d) were harder to recall than non rhyming letters (f u l t w p n).

This was due to acoustic confusion errors

He found similar effects for rhyming and non rhyming words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nature of memory

How did Peterson and Peterson demonstrate that the duration of STM was about 18 seconds?

Hint : what test did they use? Explain it.
What did they find?

A

Used a trigram experiment.

Asked ps to remember a nonsense syllable of 3 consonants (KPD).

Ps given an interference task to stop them rehearsing (counting back in 3s)

Ps asked to recall triagrams after 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 seconds SS.

Recall was gold after 3s (80%), poor after 18 secs 10%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nature of memory

How did baddelely demonstrate LTM was coded semantically?

But what is an idea contradicting this?

A

Gave so list of words to remember and found when recall tested after 20 mins ps found it more difficult to recall words of similar meaning than words of non similar meaning.

These semantic confusion errors suggest coding in LTM is by meaning.

However, may use more than one type of coding in LTM. Words like sunset, pyramid are easy to visualise so may use visual code but words like clever and guilty are more abstract so may be coded semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nature of memory

How did Bahrick demonstrate the duration of LTM was few minutes to a lifetime?

What do Bahrick find?

A

Yearbook study.

Opportunity sample of 392 American ex high school students age 17-74. Tested by:

  • free recall of names of former class mates
  • photo recognition asked to identify classmates from set of 50 photos (not all photos were actually classmates)
  • name recognition test
  • name and photo matching test

Found:
90% accuracy in face and name recognistion even in ps who left school 34 years ago.

After 48 years old 80% for name recognition and 40% for face recognition.

Free recall only 60% accurate in psychology that left 15 years ago and only 30% accurate in ps who left 48 years ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Bahrick conclude in his yearbook study on the nature of memory? (Duration for LTM)

A

Classmates are rarely forgotten when recognition clues are given so LTM can have a very long duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nature of memory - Evaluation (A03)

Strength - type of RM?

A

Lab based research

High control of extraneous veritable e.g interference task to stop rehearsal.

Cause and effect can be inferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nature of memory - Evaluation (A03)

Criticism - ecological validity

A

Much of this research lacks EV.

Tests using consonants in a lab are not like real life. In real life we remember events and meaningful info.

So may not tell us anything useful about the nature of memory

For example, research into anxiety shows how emotion affects your memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nature of memory - Evaluation (A03)

Criticism - internal validity?

A

Ps specifically asked to remember words/letters so introduce demand characteristics.

Ps guess they meant to be remembering the words.

Research may lack internal validity

17
Q

Nature of memory - Evaluation (A03)

Strength of Bahricks study

A

Study looked at memory of classmates and so is an example of how we use memory in real life.

Lists of words not remembered for as long.

Demonstrates dangers of lab based artificial studies not being appropriate to study memory.

BUT

bahricks study testing for faces of people we know. May not be representative of all memory types. Possible face memory special and remembered for longer as humans social species and it helps survival to remember faces of friends and enemies

18
Q

Nature of memory - Evaluation (A03)

Criticism - does it have high control? (Yearbook study)

A

Nature of memory meant high control not possible.

Researcher can’t control how often ps seen ex classmates or looked thorough hear books. Possible high accuracy due to rehearsal.