Names/Dates (SL) Flashcards

ALL STUDIES (SL/HL) INCLUDED

1
Q

Newcomer et al. (1999)

A

**USE FOR: Biological principle (biology correlates with behaviour)

Aim: Find role of the stress hormone cortisol on verbal declarative memory.

Group 1: High dose condition
Group 2: Low dose condition
Group 3: Placebo tablets (control)

  • Listened to a prose paragraph
  • Had to recall it (verbal declarative memory)

Results: Group 1 showed the worst performance (cortisol increase can have a negative effect on memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rosenweig, Bennett, and Diamond (1972)

A

**USE FOR Biological principle (animal research)

Aim: Study role of environmental factors on brain plasticity using rats

Group 1: Enriched environment
Group 2: Deprived environment

Results: Rats in Group 1 showed a thicker layer of neurons in their cortex compared to deprived group (brain grows the more that neurons are stimulated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bouchard et al. (1990)

A

**USE FOR: Biological principle (behaviour is genetically based); extent to which genetics influence behaviour

aka Minnesota Twin Study
Aim: Investigate relative roles in genes in IQ

MZ reared Apart
MZ reared Together

Results: MZT had concordance rate of IQ of 86%. MZA had concordance rate of IQ of 76% (there is a link between genetic inheritance and intelligence, but does not rule out the role of environment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Darley and Gross (1983)

A

**USE FOR: Cognitive principle (mental processes guide behaviour); Evaluate schema theory; stereotypes effect on behaviour

Aim: Investigate schema theory

  • Showed a girl in a poor environment, then a wealthy environment.
  • Asked participants how well she would do in an intelligence test

Results: Most participants figured the “wealthy” girl would do better than the “poor” girl (human beings actively process information based on salient details to make an impression that may or may not be true)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Loftus and Palmer (1974)

A

**USE FOR: Cognitive principle (mind can be studied scientifically); reliability in cognitive processes (reconstructive memory)

Aim: Test reconstructive memory in relation to eyewitness testimony

  • Showed a picture of a car crash to participants
  • Asked to estimate how fast the car was going when it “smashed”/”hit”/”bumped” the other car

Results: The change of word ultimately caused different results in estimated speed (significant difference)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bartlett (1932)

A

**USE FOR: Cognitive principle (influenced by social and cultural factors); Evaluate schema theory; emic concept

Aim: Investigate differences in interpretation of a story

  • Asked British participants to read an unfamiliar Native American story
  • British participants were then asked to reproduce it

Results: The participants changed details of t story to fit with their own cultural schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scoville and Milner (1957)

A

**USE FOR: Multi-store model of memory; how biological factors may affect a cognitive process; localization of the brain

  • Choice of interviewer
  • Extent of training of interviewer
    aka H.M. Case Study
  • H.M. fell off his bike at the age of 7; constant epileptic seizures caused life to be difficult.
  • Scoville performed experimental surgery to try and end seizures, which was successful, but H.M. suffered from amnesia for the rest of his life
  • H.M. had severe damage to the hippocampus (shown in MRI scans), and was unable to store new memories.
  • In a more complex sense, he could store new procedural memories (implicit memory) but was unable to store new explicit memories (semantic/episodic).
  • He could carry on normal conversations, but would forget the meaning of the conversation immediately after.
  • Shows that hippocampus is vital to making new memories.
  • Also shows that the memory system contains different systems within itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rogoff and Waddel (1982)

A

**USE FOR: how social/cultural factors affect one cognitive process

Aim: Investigate culture and memory

  • Constructed a miniature model of a Mayan village
  • Researcher selected 20 miniature objects from 80 and put them in the model.
  • Objects were taken out and replaced among the other 60 objects.
  • Children (Mayan and American) were asked to reconstruct the scene they had been shown.

Results: Mayan children did slightly better because the scene meant more to them than it did to the American children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brown and Kulik (1977)

A

**USE FOR: how emotion may affect a cognitive process (theory)

Aim: Investigate flashbulb memory (vivid memory due to shock)

  • 80 participants were asked to recall circumstances where they learned of shocking events

Results: Participants had very vivid memories of what, where, when, and how. Used assassination of John F. Kennedy, or death of a loved one as a base (to find what was correct).

  • Shows it is more likely for unexpected/personally relevant events
  • May be caused by the physiological emotional arousal from learning of the event
  • Emotion could have influence the reconstructed memory; flashbulb memory may not be entirely accurate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Davidson et al. (2004)

A

**USE FOR: interaction between cognitive/physiology in terms of behaviour

Aim: Investigate whether meditation can change brain activity

Experimental: 8 monks (study meditation often)
Control: 10 students (1 wk of training)

  • Asked to meditate on “unconditional compassion”
  • Control took a training session (where they were asked to open feelings of compassion)
  • Control was then asked to feel compassion without thinking of someone
  • Monks’ brains (through EEG scans) showed greater activation as well as better organization and coordination of gamma waves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fessler et al. (2005)

A

**USE FOR: evolutionary explanation of behaviour

Aim: Investigate if disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy was elevated as predicted

  • A survey was completed by 691 women online, with the mean age of the participants being 28.1 yrs
  • Indicated current level of nausea and answered questions to test disgust sensitivity in food, animals, body products, dead animals, hygiene, and toilets

Results: Disgust was particularly elevated in food. Known that food-borne illnesses are particularly dangerous in first trimester, which indicates possibly why disgust of food is so much higher at that point of pregnancy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hamilton (1963)

A

**USE FOR: explaining altruism in humans

aka Kin Selection Theory

  • Based on idea that organisms are more likely to aid their own kin rather than non-kin
  • Contribute to survival of own genes (selfish gene theory by Dawkins 1989)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Simmons et al. (1977)

A

**USE FOR: kin selection theory

Aim: Investigate likelihood of close relatives in becoming kidney donors

Results: 86% of parents said yes; 47% of siblings said yes (the closer the potential donor was to the relative, the more likely they were to become donors, taking into account gender, same sex, etc.)

**NOTE Does not explain how there were people who said no to becoming a donor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Batson et al. (1981) THEORY

A

**USE FOR: explaining altruism in humans

aka Empathy-Altruism Theory

  • Suggests that some actions truly are altruistic
  • Based on motives of an individual (empathic conern/personal distress or egoism)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Batson et al. (1981) EXPERIMENT

A

**USE FOR: empathy-altruism theory

Aim: Investigate motives to help when there is an opportunity to escape

Condition 1: High empathy/Difficult escape
Condition 2: High empathy/Easy escape
Condition 3: Low empathy/Difficult escape
Condition 4: Low empathy/Easy escape

Easy escape: Replace Elaine/Fill in questionnaire
Difficult escape: Replace Elaine/Watch remaining trials

  • Participants watched a tester (Elaine) answering questions wrong and getting electric shocks.
  • Asked if they wished to take her place.

Results: Those in HE/HD condition were more likely to replace Elaine. Those in LE condition were less likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Latané and Darley (1970) THEORY

A

**USE FOR: factors in influencing bystanderism

aka Theory of the unresponsive behaviour

  • Suggests that the presence/feeling of witnesses to an event will decrease likelihood that an individual will intervene.

Due to psychological processes like:

  • Diffusion of responsibility
  • Informational social influence (pluralistic ignorance)
  • Evaluation apprehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Latané and Darley (1968)

A

**USE FOR: bystanderism

Aim: Investigate if the number of witnesses of an emergency influences people’s helping in an emergency situation

Participants were told that discussion was between:

Condition 1: 1 other person
Condition 2: 3 other people
Condition 3: 6 other people

  • 72 students (59 female, 13 male) were asked to discuss personal problems new colleges could have in an urban area.
  • Were told that the discussion took place via an intercom to protect the anonymity of participants.
  • A confederate staged a seizure.

Researchers looked at the time it took for participants to contact the experimenter

Results: 85% in Condition 1 reported the seizure. Only 62% in Condition 3 reported the seizure and were slower to help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Pilliavin et al. (1969) THEORY

A

**USE FOR: bystanderism

Cost reward model of helping

Suggests that both cognitive (cost-benefit analysis) and emotional factors (unpleasant emotional arousal) determine whether bystanders to an emergency will intervene.

Focus on egoistic motivation to escape an unpleasant emotional state (empathy-altruism model).

Note that egoistic motivation is not always the reason for help however.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pilliavin et al. (1969) EXPERIMENT

A

**USE FOR: bystanderism

aka Subway Samaritan

Aim: Investigate the effect of various variables on helping behaviour.

Condition 1: confederate was “drunk” (black/white)
Condition 2: confederate was “ill” (black/white)

  • Performed a scenario with each condition, where the confederate collapsed on the floor.
  • Participants were subway travellers who observed the scenario.
  • If no one helped after 70 seconds, a model helper intervened.

Results: The person who was ill was more likely to receive help. In 60% of trials, more than one person offered assistance.

Found that people look at:

  • costs of helping
  • costs of not helping
  • rewards of helping
  • rewards of not helping
20
Q

LeDoux (1999)

A

**USE FOR: cognitive/biological factors in emotion

aka Theory of the emotional brain

Based on idea that humans’ emotional reactions are flexible due to evolution. Learning to detect and respond to danger is important for survival. The evolved “emotional feeling” helps evaluate the level of danger before a response. (fear)

Short route: Amygdala reacts immediately to sensory input and activates response systems. Useful in case of immediate danger.

Long route: Sensory input goes via the sensory cortex to the hippocampus. Involves evaluation of stimulus to consider an appropriate response (cognitive appraisal)

21
Q

Lazarus (1975)

A

**USE FOR: cognitive/biological factors in emotion

aka Appraisal theory

Suggests that cognitive factors can modulate stress responses (physiological/psychological reactions involved in experience)

Basically an evaluation of a situation.

22
Q

Speisman et al. (1964)

A

**USE FOR: appraisal theory

Aim: Investigate the extent to which manipulation of cognitive appraisal could influence emotional experience.

Condition 1: Trauma (emphasis on mutilation/pain)
Condition 2: Intellectual (anthropological interpretation)
Condition 3: Denial (willing and happy adolescents)

  • Participants saw anxiety-evoking films (ex. circumcision of aboriginal adolescent boys)
  • Each condition had a different soundtrack
  • Heart rate and galvantic skin responses were some physiological measures that were taken from the participants

Results: Trauma condition showed much higher physiological measures of stress than other two conditions (reacted more emotionally)

**WATCH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY AND ETHICS

23
Q

Heider (1958)

A

**USE FOR: situational/dispositional factors in behaviour

aka Attribution theory

Based on assumption that people are naive scientists who try to explain observable behaviour.

  • Tend to look for causes and reasons for other people’s behaviour because they feel that there are motives behind behaviour
  • “Intuitive psychologists” who construct their own causal theories of human behaviour
  • Construct causal behaviours because they want to be able to understand, predict, and control the environment around them

People want to be able to predict the world, so they look for causes, rational or irrational.

24
Q

Ross (1977)

A

**USE FOR: errors in attribution

aka Fundamental attribution error (FAE)

When someone places more emphasis on internal factors (personality) rather than the circumstances.

  • Ross, Amabile and Steinmetz (1977)

EVALUATION: (*positive; -negative)

+ Promoted common understanding of how people are judged in the world.
+ Many supporting studies
- Culturally biased (focus on individualism)
- Original studies do not look at how long an interaction is made between two people (which can change judgement)

25
Ross, Amabile and Steinmetz (1977)
**USE FOR: fundamental attribution error Aim: Investigate whether knowledge of distinguished social roles in a quiz would affect participants' judgement of people's expertise. Participant type 1: Questioner Participant type 2: Contestant - Participants were either a questioner or contestant in a quiz game - Questioner created 10 questions based on their own knowledge - Contestants took the quiz - Participants were all asked to rate each others' general knowledge Results: Contestants consistently rated questioners' general knowledge as superior (only looked at internal factors when rating the questioners due to their status as a questioner, demonstrating FAE) Evaluation: + Questioners were to create questions based on their own knowledge, a good set up for FAE - Sampling bias (usage of University students) - Ecological validity
26
Posey and Smith (2003)
**USE FOR: self-serving bias (SSB) - Gave math questions to children in pairs - Asked who did better Results: Those who worked with friends didn't demonstrate SSB and gave credit to their friends when successful; those not working with their friends were more likely to demonstrate SSB (NOTE THIS AS AN EXCEPTION)
27
Kashima and Tradis (1986)
**USE FOR: self-serving bias (SSB); etic concept Found that Americans often attribute failures to situation, while Japanese attributed failure to lack of ability (internal/personal) Note this as a demonstration of modesty bias (opposite of self-serving bias) **WATCH GENERALIZATION
28
Tajfel and Turner (1979)
**USE FOR: social identity theory; sociocultural principle (group memberships) aka Social Identity theory (SIT) Definition of self based on social group. In combination with the value and emotional significance attached to a membership. Deals with ingroups (group members; positive traits) and outgroups (non-group members; negative traits). These comparisons and distinctions are highly valued. - Strive to maintain positive self-concept as well as a positive social identity. - Positive social identity can either be established from a positive outcome for an ingroup, or a negative outcome for an outgroup (discrimination)
29
Sherif et al. (1961)
**USE FOR: social identity theory; origins of violence; realistic conflict theory aka Robbers' Cave expriment Aim: Demonstrate Realistic Conflict Theory (RCT) NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT MEANT FOR SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY, BUT IT DOES STILL DEMONSTRATE IT (needs added explanation) - Used middle-class, 11-year-old boys - Split kids into two groups 1st week: Isolation from other group 2nd week: Introduction to other group; incorporated competitions and prizes Following weeks: Insertion of problems that affected both groups (and required them to cooperate with each other) - Partially demonstrates discrimination of outgroups - SIT argues that conflict arises purely from group membership and competition for resources is not needed. Also argues that personal self-esteem lowers if the group loses access to resources/is looked down upon (cause of violence) EVALUATION: + High ecological validity - Cannot generalize (due to sample) - Setting young kids into a dangerous situation
30
Tajfel (1970)
**USE FOR: social identity theory; sociocultural principle (group memberships) Aim: Investigate if boys would display ingroup favouritism and intergroup discrimination (by merely categorizing them into different groups) - Used 64, 14/15-year-old boys - Kids arrived in groups of 8 (kids in groups were all from the same "house"; all knew each other prior to experiment) - All were shown forty clusters of varying numbers/dots flashed on a screen - Asked to estimate number of dots in each cluster - Told that some people consistently "overestimate"/"underestimate" the number of dots - Participants were given a "score" by experimenters - Were told that they were being grouped by be basis of judgement they made, however they were all actually randomly assigned ("overestimaters"/"underestimators") - Were told to give other participants points, which would then be converted into real money after the experiment. They did not know the identity of who they would give points to, but they did know if they were an "overestimator" or an "underestimator" Results: Found that a large majority gave more money to those within their ingroup rather than outgroup. Boys adopted ingroup favouritism. + Demonstrates SIT - Ecological validity issues; demand characteristics - Participants may have seen it as a competitive game, which could have influenced the results
31
Berry (1967)
**USE FOR: sociocultural principle (culture) - Modified Asch's experiment on conformity (had one real participant with six other confederates; asked to guess which line, A B or C, was the same length as a line on another page; confederates were tasked with purposefully saying the wrong answer to see if the real participant would conform) - Used two different cultures: Temne culture (Sierra Leone; rely on agriculture for survival) and Inuit (Baffin Islands, Canada; live on hunting and fishing) Results: Temne people showed a higher degree of conformity than Inuits, because Temne culture was based more around helping the community with agriculture, while Inuits track and hunt animals to feed their own (learn independence).
32
Howarth (2002)
**USE FOR: sociocultural principle (social animals) - Performed focus-group interviews with adolescent girls in Brixton to study how girls described/evaluated themselves. Results: Had a positive view of "being from Brixton", contrasting the view of people living outside Brixton (example of creating a positive "social identity" based on group belonging).
33
Katz and Braley (1933)
**USE FOR: formation of stereotypes aka The Princeton Trilogy Aim: Investigate whether traditional social stereotypes had a cultural basis - Asked 100 male students from Princeton to choose five traits that characterized different ethnic groups (Americans, Jews, Japanese, African-American etc.); list of 84 words Results: Showed considerable agreement in stereotypes, especially of negative traits. Most were very positive to their own group (ingroup bias). Suggested that most of the students did not have any personal contact with members of the ethnic groups they had to rate (demonstrates that stereotypes are learned through media or gatekeepers)
34
Kimball and Zabrack (1986)
**USE FOR: social learning theory - Children in Canada were found to have become significantly more aggressive two years after television was introduced to their town. EVALUATION + Indicates a link between watching violent television and aggressive behavior - Does not rule out the possibility of other explanations for aggressive behavior.
35
Bandura (1977)
**USE FOR: explain social learning theory aka Social Learning theory Based on assumption that people learn behaviours, attitudes, emotional reactions, and norms through direct experiences but also through observing other humans (models). We learn consequences based on watching what happens to other humans. Can be direct (instruction) or indirect (role models demonstration) Four important factors in social/observational learning: 1. Attention (toward role model) 2. Retention (remembering) 3. Reproduction (needs skills to imitate behaviour) 4. Motivation (need to be motivated to imitate behaviour)
36
Bandura and Ross (1961)
**USE FOR: social learning theory Aim: See if children would imitate the aggression of an adult model and whether they would imitate same-sex models more than opposite-sex models Condition 1: Aggressive Male Condition 2: Aggressive Female Condition 3: Non-aggressive Male Condition 4: Non-aggressive Female - 36 boys; 36 girls (mean age 4.4) from Stanford University Nursery School - Some watched an aggressive male/female, and some watched a non-aggressive male/female. Depending on the condition, they would either act aggressively toward a Bobo doll, or completely ignore it. Results: Chilren who had seen an aggressive model were significantly more aggressive (physically and verbally) in the second part of the experiment. They were also more likely to imitate same-sex models. Boys were more aggressive overall than the girls. EVALUATION: + Key to Social Learning theory; very good explanation - Not possible to conclude that children are ALWAYS more aggressive when they witness aggression - Ecological validity issues - Artificial aggression (demand characteristics) - Ethical issues
37
Freedman and Fraser (1966)
**USE FOR: compliance techniques aka Foot-in-the-door technique (FITD) Assumes agreeing to a small request increases the likelihood of agreeing to a second, larger request. So, initially you make a small request and once the person agrees to this they find it more difficult to refuse a bigger one. - Most powerful when a person's self-image is related to the request, and if the requests are follow-ups of each other (related)
38
Dickerson et al. (1992)
**USE FOR: foot-in-the-door technique (FITD) - Asked university students to conserve water in the dormitory showers. - Asked to sign a poster supporting shorter showers to save water. - Asked to do a survey asking them to think about their own water usage. - Students' shower time was monitored. Results: Students who had signed the poster and had done the survey spent an average of 3.5 minutes less in the shower than the rest in the dormitory (compliance with a small request increases likelihood of compliance; feel committed once they say "yes") EVALUATION: - Note that this example does not have the two requests as a follow-up to each other (which would make the request more likely to be fulfilled)
39
Cialdini (1993)
**USE FOR: compliance techniques aka Norm/Rule of reciprocity Dictates that we treat other people the way they treat us. People are socialized into returning favours and this powerful rule underpins compliance.
40
Cialdini et al. (1975)
**USE FOR: door in the face technique Aim: Study effectiveness of the DITF technique Group 1: Control Group 2: Experimental - Researchers pretended to be representatives of the "County Youth Counselling Programme" - Asked college students (Group 1) if they were willing to chaperone a group of juvenile delinquents on a day trip to the zoo. - Asked another group (Group 2) if they were willing to sign up to work for two hours a week as counselors for a minimum of two years. - Asked this same group again if the students would be willing to chaperone a day trip to the zoo for juvenile delinquents. Results: 83% said no to the first request; many still refused the second request; 50% agreed to the third
41
Sherif (1936)
**USE FOR: conformity to group norms Aim: Investigate conformity to perceived group norm - Used an autokinetic effect (optical illusion where the fixed pinpoint of light in a completely dark room appears to move because of the eye movements, but in reality, does not move) for this experiment. The purpose was that this would change for every individual person (as it was an illusion of the mind). It should be unique to everyone. - Asked participants to estimate the length in which the light moved. - Tested individually, then in groups Results: Individually, they all came up with their own norms. When they were put into groups, however, their norms changed (changed their answers to fit with the group answers, so for example, someone who initially guessed 6 in. changed their answer to 4 in. if the group came up with smaller answers)
42
Asch (1951)
**USE FOR: conformity to group norms Aim: Investigate whether perceived group pressure by a majority can influence a minority in an experimental set-up that is not ambiguous Group 1: Experimental Group 2: Control - Seven participants (one real participant; six confederates) sat around a table. Two cards (one with one line, the other with three labeled A, B and C) were set on the table. - Participants were asked to guess which line (A, B or C) was identical to the the line on the other card. - Confederates were either tasked with saying the correct answer or an incorrect answer. - 37 participants did the experiment alone, for comparison (control group) Results: 32% of participants complied with the wrong answers; 0.7% in control group made wrong answers EVALUATION: + High degree of control ensures cause-effect relationship + Results have been replicated + Can to an extent explain why people conform to social/cultural norms in real life - Watch cross-cultural differences (Berry 1967) - Ecological validity issues - Can only explain how a majority may influence conformity, not a minority - Deception was used; exposed participants to embarrassing procedures (ethical issues)
43
Hofstede (1980)
**USE FOR: cultural dimensions aka Cultural dimensions An aspect of culture that can be measured relative to other cultures. - Culture should be seen as a collective phenomenon that may distinguish one group from another. - Knowing these dimensions could help facilitate international understanding and communication
44
Wei et al. (2001)
**USE FOR: cultural dimensions Aim: Investigate the extent to which the dimension of individualism/collectivism influenced conflict resolution communication styles. Group 1: Japanese Group 2: American Group 3: Chinese Singaporeans (multinational companies) Group 4: Chinese Singaporeans (local companies) - 600 managers working in companies in Singapore were randomly selected for a survey. - Used to find possible relationships between scores on cultural dimension an conflict resolution style. Results: Higher the score in the individualist dimension made it more likely the manager was to adopt a dominating conflict resolution style. Generally the Americans were more likely to take on a dominating conflict resolution style, whereas the Asians were more likely to take on an avoidant conflict resolution style. EVALUATION: + Survey used a large representation of cross-cultural sample of managers so results can be generalized to a higher extent + Mostly reliable - Self-reports may cause some problems in reliability
45
Basset (2004)
**USE FOR: cultural dimensions Aim: Investigate differences in Chinese and Australian students' perception of conflict resolution in relation to: 1. Collectivist vs. individualist dimension 2. Long-term vs. short-term orientation - Qualitative cross-cultural study - Bachelor students of business and management (15 Chinese; 15 Australian) - Asked to analyse a potential conflict situation between a Japanese supervisor and a Canadian visiting assistant teacher. - Told to "discuss how this conflict might be resoled in China/Australia" Cultural differences: CHINESE: Concerned with face-saving (want good interpersonal relationships); important to pay attention to a relationship (offer gifts to help) AUSTRALIAN: Policies and procedures dictate the way employees and organizations operate rather than culture/tradition; saving face not as important (will push for mediation if there is a feeling of being treated unfairly) Results: Long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation was confirmed more so by the Chinese (in understanding behaviour). Generally confirmed, individualist vs. collectivist dimensions but not all data could be confirmed by this.
46
Pike (1967)
**USE FOR: emic/etic concepts EMIC CONCEPT: Emic research studies one culture alone to understand culture-specific behaviour. Researchers will attempt to study behaviour through the eyes of the people who live in that culture. Look at phenomenon (structure) and meaning (context). Focus on norms, values, motives, and customs, then interpret it using their own words. ETIC CONCEPT: Etic research compares psychological phenomena across cultures to find out what could be universal in human behaviour. Purpose is to compare and contrast cultural phenomena to investigate whether phenomena is culture-specific or universal.