Murder And Manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

What is the distinguishing element in the charge of murder

A

The offenders awareness or recklessness of the knowledge that their actions are likely to result in the death of the other person.

The jury decides if the defendant has the knowledge at the time by drawing inferences from the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Do you need to prove that the secondary party knew that death was a probable consequence when charging under section 168

A

No, just that the secondary party knew it was probable the principal party do an act that would if death resulted bring their conduct within the terms of section 168.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name four associated murder charges

A

Attempt to murder
Counselling or attempting to procure murder
Conspiracy to murder
Accessory after the fact to murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two distinct types of manslaughter defined by common law

A

Voluntary
Involuntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the charge if homicide arose out of a suicide pact

A

Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If an offender intends to kill A but strikes the fatal blow to B, are they still guilty of murder?

A

Yes, the guilt is not affected as per section 167(c)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What to prosecution need to prove for attempt to murder

A

Mens rea and actus Rea of s72 (having intent to
Commit an offence, dies or omits an act)
Intention to kill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define voluntary manslaughter

A

Mitigating circumstances reduce what would otherwise be murder to manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define involuntary manslaughter

A

Covers types of unlawful killing in which death is caused by criminal negligence. When there has been on intention to kill or cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What issues should you consider when considering whether to charge after the killing during a sudden fight

A

Self defense
The requisite mens tea for a murder/manslaughter charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When is culpable homicide murder (4)

A
  • offender intends to cause death
  • offender causes bodily injury that is known to be likely to cause death or was reckless
  • offender means to cause death or was reckless to cause injury and accidentally or mistakenly kills someone else
  • offender does an act with an object and knows likely to cause death and kills someone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Discuss s168 further definition of murder

A

If death after causing GBH to facilitate an offence, or flight or avoid detection or revisit
If administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for purpose of above circumstances
If wilfully stops breath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define intent

A

Must be an intention to commit the act and an intention to get the specific result

Must be done deliberately

Result = S&B ‘aim object or purpose’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must be shown to prove intent to cause death

A

Intended to cause death OR
knew that death was likely to ensue OR
was reckless that death would ensue

If not present the offence is manslaughter unless elements exist for infanticide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discuss recklessness using case law

A

Cameron v R: recklessness is established if the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that their actions would bring the proscribed result and the proscribed circumstances existed and having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discuss R v Tipple

A

A deliberate decision to run the risk of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Discuss R v Piri

A

Recklessness involves a conscious, deliberate risk taking. The risk of death under s167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. They must recognise a real or substantial risk of death.

18
Q

What was found in R v Desmond in relation to killing in pursuit of an unlawful object

A

Not only must the object be unlawful, but also the accused must know it was likely to cause death must show the knowledge accompanied the act.

19
Q

What was found in R v Murphy in relation to attempts

A

Must be shown that the accused’s intention was to commit the substantive offence. Acts must be sufficiently proximate to the full offence. The defendant must have started to commit the full offence and have gone past the preparation stage.

20
Q

What was found in R v Harpur in relation to attempts

A

Several acts together may constitute an attempt.

Viewing the conduct cumulatively up to the point where the conduct stops. It may be considered in its entirety

21
Q

What is the proximity test?

A

Simester and brookbanks: has the defendant done anything more than getting himself into a position to make an attempt or have they commences execution and taken a step to the full offence.

The judge decides proximity.

22
Q

Manslaughter by unlawful act. Newbury & Jones 4 point test.

A
  1. Defendant must intentionally do an act
  2. Act must be unlawful
  3. Act must be dangerous
  4. Act must cause death
23
Q

Manslaughter by negligence situations

A

When in charge of trains, machinery, mines, vehicles, ships or weapons or while administering medical or surgical treatment

24
Q

What charges should be considered as an alternative to manslaughter for negligent drivers?

A

Alternative offences under LTA
aggravated, careless, dangerous and reckless driving causing death.

Consider aggravating contributing factors that may indicate manslaughter.

25
Q

What must prosecution prove for gross negligence

A

A very high degree of negligence or gross negligence.

Must be a major departure from the standard of care expected.

26
Q

What was found in R b Adomako in relation to gross negligence

A

Having regard to the risk of death, the defendant knowingly ran that risk or was indifferent to an obvious risk of death.

27
Q

What is infanticide?

A

A charge brought against a mother who has killed her child as a result of her mind being unbalanced due to the effects of giving birth or lactation

28
Q

What are the legal duties of providing things and conditions to sustain life and protect from injury
S 151 & S 152

A

To provide necessaries and to take reasonable steps to protect that person from injury if you have actual care or are in charge of vulnerable adults or parents caring for a child under 18

29
Q

Provide examples of ‘dangerous things’ as discussed in s156

A

Motor vehicles, trains, animals, ships, weapons, machinery or explosives

30
Q

Who decides on the mothers state of mind in relation to infanticide

A

The jury

31
Q

Define vulnerable adult

A

A person unable by reason of detention, age, sickness, mental impairment or any other cause to withdraw themself from the care/charge of another person.

Can be short lived or temporary

32
Q

What are necessaries of life

A

Commodities and services necessary to sustain life. Eg food, clothing, housing, warmth and medical care

33
Q

Causing death that might have been prevented

A

By an act or omission, causes death that might have been prevented

34
Q

Causing injury, the treatment of which causes death

A

When you cause an injury and treatment is required (eg surgery) and the treatment causes death, you are liable for causing death.

Even if improper treatment, as long as acted in good faith.

The injury must remain a substantial cause of death which grew from the subsequent effects and risks

35
Q

Is life support classed as treatment?

A

To withdraw life support is not ‘treatment’ under s166

36
Q

What is novus acus interviens?

A

An intervening act that breaks the chain of causation

37
Q

Define aiding and abetting suicide

A

Must do something to assist the suicide.

Aids, abets, incites, counsels or procures any person to commit suicide

38
Q

Define aiding and abetting suicide

A

Must do something to assist the suicide.

Aids, abets, incites, counsels or procures any person to commit suicide

39
Q

Define suicide pact and when is someone liable

A

Suicide pact is a common agreement between two or more people where the object is death of all of them.

If a person survives they are guilty of manslaughter.

40
Q

What is the offence of concealment of a child’s body?

A

When someone disposes of a dead body with intent to conceal the birth from any person whether they died before, during of after birth.

A ‘child’ is defined as a child of comparatively recent birth

It must be done with intent to conceal the fact of both. May be satisfied even if the birth is known to some people.

41
Q

What is the rule around admissibility of hearsay statements?

A

Generally admissible if the statement is reliable and either maker is unavailable or judge considers it an undue expense or delay to get them to court.

42
Q

What circumstances need to be considered when assessing hearsay statements?

A
  • nature
  • content
  • circumstances of the making
  • veracity
  • accuracy