Culpable Homicide Flashcards

1
Q

Define homicide

A

The killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.

It must be culpable to be an offence (deserving blame).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can an organisation be convicted of murder or manslaughter?

A

Manslaughter - can be convicted as a party

Murder - cannot be convicted as a party or principal offender because it carries a life sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the case law around Murray Wright Ltd

A

Because the killing must be done by a human being, an organisation cannot be convicted as a principal offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is culpable homicide? And what are the three types?

A

The blameworthy killing of a person by another

  • murder
  • manslaughter
  • infanticide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the critical distinction between murder and manslaughter?

A

Whether the offender intended to kill the deceased or to harm them in a way they knew might result in death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

To establish death, what three things must you prove?

A
  • death occurred
  • deceased is identified as the person who has been killed
  • the killing is culpable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 5 ways that constitute culpable homicide?

A
  • by an unlawful act
  • by an omission without legal excuse to perform or observe any legal duty
  • by both combined (unlawful act and omission)
  • by threats, fear of violence or deception which causes death
  • by wilfully frightening a child <16 or a sick person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ‘unlawful act’

A

Any breach of any act, regulation, rule or bylaw

R v Myatt: it must be an act likely to do harm to the deceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was found in R v Lee in relation to ‘harm’

A

‘Some’ harm means more than trivial harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Provide examples of being criminally responsible when there is a standard of care when under legal duties or performing unlawful acts

A
  • arson
  • giving child alcohol
  • supplying heroin to someone who has an overdose
  • throwing concrete from a motorway over bridge
  • illegal abortion and the mother dies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was found in R v Tomars
(Death cause by fear, threats, deceived)

A
  1. Was the deceased threatened by, in fear of or deceived by the defendant
  2. Did this cause the deceased to do the act that caused the death
  3. Was the act a natural consequence of the defendant’s actions
  4. Did these actions contribute in a significant way to their death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When does a child become a human?

A

When it has completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother, breathing or not, independent circulation or not, navel string severed or not.

This killing of such child is homicide if it dies in consequence of injuries received before, during or after birth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discuss case law around a body not being located

A

R v Horry: the circumstances of the death should be so cogent and compelling that the jury would have no doubt that the death had occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Provide two examples of when acts are justified even when they result in death? (Non culpable homicide)

A
  • homicide committed in self defence
  • homicide committed to prevent suicide or an offence that would likely cause immediate and serious injury to person or property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the legal view of consent to death?

A

S63 - the law does not recognise the right of a person to consent to being killed. Their consent does not affect the criminal responsibility of anyone else involved in the killing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is a body required to prove the death of a person?

A

No a body is not required. Death should be provable by such circumstances as render it morally certain and leave no ground for reasonable doubt.

17
Q

Would you be charged if you fatally injure another player during a rugby match?

A

No not unless your actions would be considered likely to cause serious injury