murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define murder

A

Murder is the unlawful killing of a reasonable human being under the queens peace with malace aforthought express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what type of law and sentence type is it

A

a common law statute with a mandatory life sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what elements of causation must be included in a murder essay

A

Factual causation, legal causation (de-minimus rule), break in the chain, medical negligence and thin skull

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case supports factual causation

A

R v white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

give the facts of R v white

A

D intended to kill his mother by poisoning her but she died of a heart attack hours before, D was not the substantial cause but was convicted of attempted murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case supports legal causation

A

R v Kimsey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the facts of R v kimsey

A

D and V were involved in a high speed car chase and V died. The courts said that D was a substantial cause to her death and was therefore liable with no intent to murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case supports victims own conduct as an intervening act

A

R v Roberts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the facts of R v Roberts

A

V jumped out of the car at high speed to escape a sexual act from D. D was not guilty of section 47. offences against the person act because he did not intend for her to jump out of the car.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the cases supporting medical negligance

A

R v Jordan and R v cheshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the facts of R v Jordan and R v cheshire

A

Jordan: V admitted to hospital after a stab wound and given liquids he was alergic to. He died from the liquid not the stab wound.

Cheshire: V was admitted to hospital after a shooting and suffered breathing problems from the tubes provided. He died 7 weeks later after the wounds were healed. the tubes were not substantial alone to kill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what case supports the thin skull rule

A

R v Blaue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the facts of R v blaue

A

V refused to have a blood transfusion on religious grounds after D stabbed her. D still convicted of murder because you must ‘ take your victim as you find them’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case supports murder in relation to a foetus

A

Attorney generals reference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the facts of attorney generals reference

A

D stabbed a pregnant woman in the face. The baby was born premature and died an early age. D was convicted of manslauter and not murder because a foetus is not a human being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When does a person cease to be a human being and what are the cases to support

A

when the brain stem becomes no longer active and the person is kept alive by artificial means.
malcherek and steel

17
Q

what are the facts of malcharek and steel

A

Both cases held where the defendants had harmed their wives. Both on life support machines and the doctors turned them off, so D’s appealed that it was a novus intervenious interaction. Appeals rejected.

18
Q

what cases are used in support of the householder criteria in support of murder

A

R v martin

R v Beckford

19
Q

what happened in the cases of R v martin and R v beckford

A

R v martin-shot two intruders in the back as they left his house, he could not use the householder criteria as self defense because defense was disproportionate.

R v Beckford- Police officer shot at V who was terrorising his family with a gun, he shot at V as he left the premesis and the defence was disproporitionate