Multi Store Memory model Flashcards
Who created the MSM model?
Atkinson & Shiffrin 1968
What are the key claims of the MSM
each store is Unitary (one store with no separate parts)
each store is separate (features are different / capacity , duration , coding / one can be damaged when the others aren’t)
Discuss the sensory register
(memory store for senses)
Capacity = very large Duration = limited Coding = unprocessed form
- if we don’t pay attention then it fades
discuss & evaluate Sperlings (1960) study into the SR
- 3x4 grid of letters flashes for 50ms
- recall letters
- recall single rows with corresponding tones
- recalled approx 4 letters
- capacity = minimum 4 items for 1/5-1/2 of a second
- high control
- low ecological validity
outline short term memory
Capacity - 7+/-2
Duration - 18-30s
Coding - Acoustic
outline studies into stm
Miller 1956
- digit span technique
- 7+/-2 & chunking
Peterson&Peterson 1959
- 24undergrads , consonant trigram
- asked to count back in threes to stop rehearsal
- after intervals 3,6,9,12,15,18-30+ seconds asked to repeat trigram
- 3secs = 80% recall , 18secs = 10% , 30secs =no trigrams recalled
duration =30secs or less if rehearsal blocked
evaluate studies into STM
+ lab experiments
-(7+/-2) individual differences e.g age
outline LTM
capacity : unlimited
duration : lifelong
coding : semantic
outline and evaluate LTM duration
Bahrick et al (1975)
- 50year period/ 392 graduates/ pics from HS year book/ 2 groups (photo recognition / name recall)
PR : 15y - 90% 48y - 70% NR: 15y - 60% 48y - 30%
- high ecological validity
- low control
outline and evaluate capacity of LTM
Baddeley (1966)
-british housewives/ 4 conditions/ 10 words :
- acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar, semantically dissimilar
-STM=immediately recall 10 words / LTM=20 min other task, recall 10 words in correct order
—recall worse for semantically similar than dissimilar & recall worse for acoustically similar words than dissimilar words in STM
- high control (lab)
- low ecological validity
- low population validity
evaluation of MSM
- Clive Wearing (case study) / supports MSM / stm elapsed showing this works but could not recall some LTM memories e.g musical education & children names
- CW / doesn’t support / has some long term memories but not others / whole section isn’t damaged showing it’s not unitary / forgets episodic but has procedural
- Glanzer&Cunitz (primacy&recency effect)
- flashbulb memories
explain the MSM
stimuli | SM | attention | STM (