Multi-criteria Decision-making for Construction Flashcards
Engineering project key decisions
What materials?
What structural configuration?
What location?
Key Features of MCDM?
Identification and evaluation of multiple criteria or objectives.
Criteria may be conflicting, uncertain, and/or subjective.
Provides a structured approach by using maths and/or analytical models
MCDM helps with decision making by:
- Gain better understanding of problem
- Organising and synthesising range of info
- Integrating objective measurements with value judgements
- Managing subjectivity
- Taking into account all criteria and decision factors
MCDM steps
- Problem definition
- Criteria definition
- Alternatives
- Scoring
- Evaluation
Advantages of MCDM
- Comprehensive & structural approach to decision making
- Allows multiple criteria
- Identifies trade-offs & most preferred alternatives
Disadvantages of MCDM
- Time-consuming & resource-intensive
- Involves bias/subjective judgements (for weighting & scoring)
- Weightings will affect the final decision
What are the design pillars?
Social
Environmental
Economic
Sustainability
Sustainability standard?
EN 15643:2021
Sustainability of construction works - Framework for assessment of buildings and civil engineering works
Environmental criteria!
- Water (consumption/depletion, eutrophication)
- Air (Greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, ozone, pollution)
- Biodiversity
- Resource use and waste (material extraction, energy use, waste generation/management)
- Land and soil (habitat destruction, changes to land use)
Economic criteria!
- Construction costs
- Use costs
- Maintenance costs
- End of life costs
Social criteria!
- Workers (H&S, modern slavery, working conditions)
- Safety (during construction, during use)
- Users (H&S, thermal performance, air quality/comfort, accessibility)
- Local community (disruptions, noise, air quality, landscape changes)
- Value chain actors (Social responsibility, fair competition, fair working conditions)
- Society (quality of life)
Types of MCDM methods
- Multi-criteria value functions
- Pairwise comparisons
- Distance to ideal point
- Outranking approaches
- Multi-criteria value functions MIVES
Evaluate each alternative as sum of the weighted performance scores.
Weighted average
- Pairwise comparisions (AHP)
Compare criteria & alternatives in every unique pair.
- Distance to ideal point methods (TOPSIS)
Identify ideal and anti-ideal values for the criteria and align options that are closest to each