MT4 - Gender and achievement Flashcards
External Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Impact of feminism
McRobbie shows the impact of feminism on girls through her studies of girls’ magazines from the 1970s and 1990s. In 1970s magazines emphasis the importance of getting married whilst in the 1990s magazines emphasised the importance of strong independent women
External Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Changes in the family
Driver argues the increase in divorce and lone parent families has created a new positive role model for girls (a strong independent financially stable woman). To achieve this independence, women need well paid jobs which need qualifications and this encourages girls to work hard in school.
External Factors leading to girls achieving in education:
Girls’ changing ambitions
Sharpe carried out 2 sets of interviews with school girls in the 1970s and 1990s. In the 1970s girls saw education as unfeminine and instead prioritised marriage, love, husbands and children. In the 1990s her findings were the opposite and this shows the change in girls’ ambitions from marriage and motherhood to education and career which is the reason for the educational success
External Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Increase in women’s employment opportunities
There has been an increase in the number of working women due to the growth of the service sector (tertiary sector) which tends to employ women. This gives girls an incentive to get qualification as there are employment opportunities for them in the job market.
Internal Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Equal opportunities policies:
initiatives such as GIST (Girls into science and technology) which aim to encourage girls to choose science related education and careers. This motivates girls to pursue STEM careers for which they need qualifications so they work hard at school.
Internal Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Coursework
Mitsos and Browne - girls do better in coursework because they are better organised and take greater care of their work because of gender socialization that encourages girls to be neat, tidy and patient.
Internal Factors leading to girls achieving in education: Selection policies (marketisation - league table competition)
Jackson argues girls are seen as more desirable candidates for high performing schools as their exams results are better and this can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy of success.
Why do working class underachieve: Archer et al
Found w/c girls underachieve because of the conflict between their w/c feminine identity and the values of the school. w/c girls adopt a hyper-heterosexual feminine identity and focus on boyfriends and being loud because it gains them symbolic capital however this leads them in conflict with the education system
Why do working class underachieve: Evans
Studied 21 high achieving 6th Form w/c girls and found the girls self-excluded from top universities (to help their families which limited the choice of university for the girls and the market value of their degree, which impacts their future career opportunities) by choosing to live at home therefore, even the high achieving w/c girls are disadvantaged by their w/c feminine identity, even though they do not see it that way.
Why boys underachieve: Decline in traditional men’s jobs (manufacturing industry)
Mitsos and Browne - since the 1980s there has been a decline in industries requiring hard manual labour which traditionally employed men and this has led to a crisis of masculinity as men are unsure of what it is to ‘be a man’. This lack of traditional male jobs makes boys believe they will not be able to get a job which leads to a lack of motivation so they give up on trying to get qualifications.
Why boys underachieve: Poor literacy skills
This affects their achievement across a wide range of subjects. Studies show that most of the reading to children at home is done by mothers so the activity becomes associated with femininity. Thus boys reject it. Also, parents spend less time reading to their sons.
Why boys underachieve: Feminisation of education
Sewell argues that schools do not encourage masculine characteristics such as competitiveness and leadership, instead they encourage traits associated with femininity such as methodical work and attentiveness.
Why boys underachieve: Laddish’ counter-school subcultures
Epstein – high achieving working class boys are labelled as ‘swots’ by their peers and tend to be harassed and subjected to homophobic abuse. Francis – boys try to avoid being labelled as ‘swots’ because educational achievement is seen as feminine so they do little or no schoolwork and mess about in lessons.
Why boys underachieve: Lack of positive male role models
There is a lack of positive male role models both at home and at school therefore, boys have no male role models to look up to and whose example they can follow.
Male peer groups
Epstein and Willis – boys in counter-school subcultures see high achieving boys as effeminate and subject them to homophobic abuse