MT1 Flashcards
prototypical vertebrate neuron
- 9 parts
- defining characteristic
- dendrites
- cell body + nucleus
- axon hillock
- axon + myelin + nodes of Ranvier
- presynaptic + postsynaptic terminals
Defining characteristic: they fire APs
types of cells
- unipolar
- bipolar
- pseudo-unipolar cell
multipolar cells (3)
- motor neuron
- pyramidal cell
- purkinje cell
- unipolar: no dendrites attached to cell body (only axon)
- bipolar: axon + dendrite attached to cell body
- Pseudo-unipolar: in between 2 neurons but not connected –> can bypass cell body (go from dendrite to axon) –> for reflexes (in the peripheral NS get a lot of inputs –> connections with many other cells –> responsible for coordination
neuron functions
input: dendrites receive signal
integrative: cell body processes/combines signal –> if strong enough AP generated
conductive: AP conducts along axon
output: axon button releases NTs to next cell (synapse)
- sensory
- motor
- neuroendorcrine
sensory neurons: receives input from the outside world, not another neuron
motor neurons: receives input from other neurons (many dendrites bc they receive a lot of info) –> output to muscles (Ach causes muscles to contract)
neuroendocrine: project into body/brain –> release NTs or peptides –> get fight or flight response going
problems studying circuits
- connectome
- stretch reflex circuit
- we dont know how neurons interact at a circuit based level
- if we know the connectome (synaptic connectivity of all neurons) we can infer the circuits function (based on knowledge of how indiv parts work)
stretch reflex circuit:
- we know sensory neurons can sense stretch –> AP generated in 1D
- we know sensory neurons release excitatory NTs
- reflex = muscle –> pass cell body –> spinal cord
- cell in spinal cord gets excited by NTs –> signal propagated in 1D to the end of axon –> back to muscle
therefore, the function of this circuit is to sense stretch and send message to counteract the stretch
visualizing neurons
- unprocessed brain slice
- indiv neuron
- cortical neurons
unprocessed: brain is translucent –> useless –> cant see anything with just a light microscope
indiv neuron: single out one and stain red –> give nuclear stain to rest to make bg –> look at multiple indiv neurons and try to see if they’re unique –> see what they’re doing (function)
cortical neurons: come from brain –> carry sensory info (storing info? hippocampus stores memory)
complementary approaches
options: combine to see diff aspects –> each has advantages/disadvantages –> depends on expt
- dead tissue vs live tissue: some only work on dead tissue –> want to see changes over time wont work (need live tissue) –> if you want to see disease model (end product) dead tissue is fine
- cell type or molecule presence: can track proteins over time
- cheap vs expensive; low vs high resolution: electron microscope SO EXPENSIVE compared to light microscope, but much higher res
- easy vs hard: very difficult to raise transgenic mice with cells that glow in the brain
Methods for visualizing neurons Method 1: golgi stain - stain with what - con - pro - study
use silver nitrate to wash tissue –> randomly fills some neurons –> very clear neuroanatomy (random tho)
- dead tissue only
- relatively easy
- can study synaptic pruning, schizophrenia (patients have fewer spines in PFC –> overpruning)
Methods for visualizing neurons Method 2: dye filling neurons - target - how to fill? - study what? - correlates with?
target living or dead cells –> use micropipet to inject fluorescent dye –> able to see neuroanatomy
- put electrode in pipet (if you can see pipet poking out you know it is dye filling method!!) –> can measure electrophysiology
- autism = underpruning (more spines = more synapses)
- can correlate spines w electro activity –> see if spines are important for synaptic activity
Methods for visualizing neurons Method 3: immunohistochemistry - difference from methods 1/2 - procedure - advantages/disadvantages - AD
- labelling proteins not staining cell
- takes advantage of an animals ability to make antibodies
- can make antibodies for protein (antigen) –> inject into animal
- immune cells produce those antibodies –> label with fluorescent tag attached to antibody
- can label multiple proteins and get diff combos of colours –> multiple cell types in same tissue –> localization
- dead tissue; relatively cheap and easy
- shows that first sign of AD is loss of synaptic proteins
- wash with antibodies –> if you get fluorescence it means the protein is there, but for AD post mortem patients we see its not there
immunohistochemistry examples
- DAPI
- doublecourtin
- calretinin
DAPI: stains all cells –> marks cell body
doublecortin: cells extend dendrites toward targets –> this protein is important for this signaling
calretinin: inhibitory interneuron –> hypothesis that they play some part in the expression of immature neurons and how they grow
Methods for visualizing neurons
Method 4: genetically-encoded fluorescent proteins
- genome
- promoter regions
- All cells in body are made of same DNA –> differential expression of diff proteins —> carry out diff functions —> unique cell (distinct neuron types, tissues, regions, etc)
- On DNA there are promoter regions –> can artificially create promoter region and inject into cell of interest
—> can make proteins we want - Make GFP code after promoter region —> can see where the cells are bc GFP is attached to (eg doublecortin)
- Can target protein —> check if cell has that protein (if we know it does, can track the cell bc of GFP)
GFP
- where did it come from?
- emission vs excitation spectra
isolated from jellyfish
on a GFP emission spectrum –> most intense light is green area (~509nm)
- dotted blue line = excitation spectrum –> the light you need to shine in order to cause GFP to emit light (~487nm)
genetic constructs
- 2 options
- advantages/disadvantages
- genetic modulation
- challenge
- can create transgenic mice –> insert DNA into embryo –> expresses GFP
- costly to set up, cheap and efficient once you have it (can just keep breeding transgenic mice, or order mice from breeders) - can insert viral vector into cell –> engineered, less toxic and more controlled than reg virus
- can label genetically-identified cells, or label modified cells (did DNA insertion work?)
genetic modulation: eg. if you’re trying to stop production of a sp protein you can put GFP in so you can look at animal and see if it worked (labelling technique)
Challenge: variable gene expression
choosing the right promoter
- why critical
- CAG
- transplants
- drawback
- critical to choose good promoter (bad promoter = silent region = no GFP made)
- can get GFP everywhere using CAG, a promoter active in all cells (actin is in all cells) –> will see activation anywhere with skin
- can use this to see if donor/transplants worked –> eg. liver transplant will show GFP if cells survived
drawback: no specificity –> not good for indiv neurons
- -> more used for “did my method work”
Other promoters:
- thy-1 promoter
- L7 promoter
- doublecortin
- Iba-1
- GFAP
Thy-1 promoter: active in a fraction of all types of neurons –> can do in-vivo imaging (live tissue)
- drawback: only in neurons expressing thy-1 –> only a subset show –> don’t know if they’re the same as their neighboring cells or not
L7 promoter: active (produces GFP) only in cerebellar purkinje neurons
doublecortin promoter: only in immature neurons
Iba-1 promoter: only in microglia –> able to see curve of hippocampus
GFAP promoter: only in astrocytes –> supportive in the brain
expressing FPs with viruses
- transgenic animals
- targets
- retrovirus
- pros and cons
- inject engineered viral vectors into a specific brain region
- does not require transgenic animals to obtain genetically modified cells (faster, cheaper)
- can target diff cell types with diff virus types (neurons vs glia, dividing vs non-dividing)
eg. retrovirus: only affects dividing cells (want a cell that is a day or 2 old) –> brand new cell
- engineered to do 1 round of replication and stop (safe)
- need to do surgery to locate area of brain you want to inject –> invasive!
clarity technique
- effect
- advantage
- disadvantage
- thy-1
brain clearing: clear membranes/lipids/fats which scatter light –> light can penetrate deeper, emitted light will be captured without scattering
- allows imaging of FPs in larger blocks of tissue –> don’t need to cut thin slices –> can see one axon from start to finish
- dead tissue only –> neurons are not static, so if you wanted to see changes over time you would need live tissue
- Thy-1 lights the entire brain with fl –> ionizing liquid will ionize micelles –> leaves proteins and carbs behind (which is what you want)