mt 1 Flashcards
sept 12 - oct 3
what is a “commons dilemma”?
-social dilemma in which noncooperation btwn indivs leads to the deterioration/collapse of a resource
-indivs make decisions out of self interest, eventually causing unintended harm to an entire group
-people sharing a resource that is limited in its capacity to regenerate
-most environmental problems can be thought of as commons dilemmas
what are assumptions of commons dilemmas (5), according to Harden? what does this lead to?
- ecological limits: **w any kind of resource, there are limits to how much it can regenerate **
- people act rationally in their indiv self-interest
- people see their indiv impact as trivial
- when unsustainability is noticed, people try to consume more before others get what is left
- no communication
-ultimately, inevitable that humans can’t successfully/sustainably share a common resource
what are Harden’s 2solutions to commons dilemmas? (2) give examples
- external coercion (govt regulation)
- privatization (end commons)
what is a social psychological critique to Harden’s assumptions of commons dilemmas?
-humans don’t always act as rational, self-interested individuals:
-often do things on behalf of others
-we’re not just individuals; belong to groups, have relationships
-question becomes one of context + variation
what are some solutions to fix commons dilemmas according to psychological studies? give examples
- communication: talking it out, face to face discussion/written messages, even just imagining a group discussion increases cooperation
- shifting our identity from “me” to “we”: collective identity, shared norms/trust/reciprocity
-eg fishing in Turkey: usable location plotted/randomly assigned and rotated; cheating does not happen (obvious; social repercussions)
what are characteristics common to successful self governance (6) (Ostrom 1990)? explain
- populations remain stable: sense of shared past/future (gives motivation for conserving it)
- norms for interdependence; no one operates completely as individuals
- relative equality (which also means most indivs affected by rules can participate in shaping them; more likely to follow)
- no external interference (may be SOME, but not dominantly)
- systems for monitoring behavior
- systems for rewards + punishments
-these lead to a sense of collective identity
-in summary, local ctrl through democratic, participatory systems which works through these 6 characteristics
Wynes looked at 12 actions which might have a high impact re: climate change. what are the 4 most substantial in magnitude throughout the developed world? what are 3 more that are also helpful? what are the remaining ones that have moderate/low impact? (5)
- have one fewer child
- live car free
- avoid air travel
- eat plant-based diet
- buy green energy
- buy more efficient car
- switch electric car to car free
8-12: replace gas w hybrid, wash clothes in cold, recycle, hang dry, upgrade lightbulbs
what is the main reason Wynes gives for the importance of behavioral change? explain why this is crucial re: adolescents
-ntl policies take decades to change; behavioral shifts can be more rapid/widespread
-adolescents make choices that will structure the rest of their lives, can also influence household decisions (they are ‘catalytic’)
(Wynes) even knowledgeable and willing individuals might not change behavior if there are norms or structural barriers. what does he suggest could address this?
-shifts in public policy (eg carbon tax)
explain the issues that Whitmarsh argues exist with the behavioral models used to explain/predict CC adaption/mitigation behaviors. what did this lead to?
-many behavioral models exist to explain/predict CC adaptation/mitigation behaviors
-however, their utility in est meaningful change is limited (too reductive, individualistic, linear, deliberative, blind to environemntal impact)
-this led to focus on suboptimal intervention strategies
what does whitmarsh believe should be done instead of the current behavioral models used to explain/predict CC adaption/mitigation behaviors?
-reqs [ ] on high impact behaviors/high-emitting groups, interdisciplinary interventions that address multiple drivers, barriers/contexts of behavior, timing to ensure interventions are targeted to moments of change when habits are weaker