MPEP 700 Flashcards
“Third-Party Requestor”
A person requesting ex parte reexamination under Section 302 who is not the patent owner.
Initial Review
Initial review of a patent looking for informalities and sufficient disclosure.
Deficiencies or informalities found by the Office of Initial Patent Examination (OIPE) is communicated by attachments to the office action.
Requirements for Information
Examiner may require the submission of information which is reasonably necessary to properly examine or treat issues. Applicant typically has three months to reply (extension available). Examiner must respond to applicant’s reply within two months of receipt.
- Initial applications
- Abandoned applications
- Applications entering the national stage
- Reissues
- Reexaminations
“Rejection”
Based on the substance of the subject matter.
Subject to appeal.
“Objection”
Based on form.
May be reviewed only by petition to the Director.
New matter added to an application will be objected to.
USPTO Claims Treatment Sequence
1) Examine the patent
2) Search prior art
3) First rejection issued, if proper
4) Applicant can rebut or amend the claims
5) Second rejection issued, if not accepted by examination
6) Decision appealable under 37 CFR 1.116
Protesting 102(a) or (b)
- Persuasively argue the claims are patently distinguishable from the prior art
- Amend the claims to make them patentably distinguishable
- Perfect priority under 35 USC 120
- Amend the specification to include a specific reference to a prior application
- Perfect a priority claim under 119(e) for a prior provisional application
Protesting 102(e)
- Persuasively argue the claims are patently distinguishable from the prior art
- Amend the claims to make them patentably distinguishable
- Perfect priority under 35 USC 120
- Amend the specification to include a specific reference to a prior application
- Perfect a priority claim under 119(e) for a prior provisional application
OR
- File an affidavit under 37 CFR 1.131 showing that the applicant actually invented the invention before the other prior applicant
- File an affidavit under 37 CFR 1.132 to show the earlier application is by “another”
Common Ownership
A party or multiple parties had 100% ownership in both the prior application and the new application at the time the new invention was invented.
Three major needs:
1) The prior art tot he claimed invention must be commonly owned (100% by the same party or joint parties);
2) Must be subject to assignment to the common owner; or
3) There was a joint research agreement in place
Joint Research Agreement
Three Major Points Needed for JRA:
1) The claimed invention was made on behalf of the parties to the JRA;
2) The invention was made due to the activities of the JRA; and
3) The application has to be amended to clearly disclose the names of the parties to the JRA
Foreign Filing License
An application will be rejected if the applicant filed in another country before receiving a foreign filing license (Automatic after 6 months)
One may obtain a Retroactive Foreign Filing License through filing a petition with a fee including:
- The name of the countries in which it was filed
- The dates of the filings
- Proof that the application was not made secret
- Statement that the license was diligently sought and the filing was in error and without deceptive intent
Final Rejection Proper
Any second or later rejection unless:
1) it is a new rejection of a claim that was not added or substantively amended; OR
2) the rejection is based on newly cited art other than information submitted in the IDS.
Can be in a first office action if:
1) it is part of a continuing or substitute application; AND
2) All of the claims are to the same invention as the parent application which could have been finally rejected in the patent application.
Final Rejection Not Proper
A final rejection is not proper if:
- it is the first office action in a Continuation-In-Part application and at least one claim includes subject matter not present in the previous application; or
- it is the first office action in a substitute application containing material presented after final rejection in an earlier application but was denied entry based on new matter
Appeal
An applicant can appeal after
- two or more office actions based on the merits; or
- any final rejection.
Filing an RCE during the appeal process stops the appeal process and starts a new examination.
Request for Continued Examination: Basics
An RCE provides a way for an applicant to obtain a continued examination of an application after prosecution has closed by filing a submission and paying a fee.
Not available for adding new matter.
Prosecution must be closed, meaning:
- Under appeal;
- The last office action was final;
- A notice of allowance has issued; or
- Any other action which closes prosecution has occurred.
Request for Continued Examination: Timing
An applicant must request the RCE by filing a submission and a fee prior to the earliest of:
- Payment of the issue fee;
- Abandonment of the application;
- Filing a notice of appeal; or
- The start of a civil suit (unless terminated while the application is still pending)
Request for Continued Examination: Submissions Included
- Fee per 37 CFR 1.17(e);
- IDS;
- Amendment to the written description, claims, drawings; or
- New arguments or evidence supporting patentability
A proper RCE addresses every ground of rejection in the final rejection. If not, office gives notice of 1 month extension to complete the reply. A 3 month extension is available if the first attempt was a bona fide attempt.
No New Matter
Order of Examination
1) Description;
2) Claims;
3) Drawings;
4) IDS;
5) ADS;
6) Oath/Declaration;
7) Small Entity Election (if applicable)
8) Petition to Make Special (if applicable)
Prioritized Examination: Basics
Track 1: AIA Section 11
Provides for the final disposition on applications within 12 months of granting the prioritized examination.
Only 10,000 per year
Available for utility patents, plant patents, RCEs in utility or plant patents