MOuntain building Flashcards
Mountain Building: overview?
Based on mode of origin, Four types of mountains
- Folded Mountains
- Block Mountains
- Dome Mountains
- Volcanic Mountains
Dome Mountains?
Dome mountains form when large globs of magma float up from beneath the crust and push up surface rocks, creating a rounded swelling in the crust. Once the magma cools, it creates a large dome of harder rock under the surface, which erosion sometimes reveals. eg. Batholithic and Laccolithic domes
Volcanic Mountains?
AKA Mountains of Accumulation as they are formed due to accumulation of volcanic materials
different types: cinder cones, composite cones etc. (refer f/c geomorphology)
Block Mountains: about?
- Block mountains, also known as faultblock mountains, are the result of faulting caused by tensile and compressive forces motored by endogenetic forces coming from within the earth. Block mountains are also called as horst mountains
- Block mountains represent the upstanding parts of the ground between two faults or on either side of a rift valley or a graben. Essentially, block mountains are formed due to faulting in the ground surface.
- Block mountains are generally of two basic types e.g.
(i) tilted block mountains having one steep side represented by fault scarp and one gentle side and
(ii) lifted block mountains represent real horst and are characterized by flattened summit of tabular shape and very steep side slopes represented by two boundary fault scarps.
* Block mountains are found in all the continents e.g.
(i) Sierra Navada mountain of California (USA) is considered to be the most extensive block mountain of the world. This mountain extends for a length of 640 km (400 miles) having a width of 80 km (50 miles) and the height of 2,400 to 3,660 m (8,000 to 12,000 feet).
(ii) Vosges and Black Forest mountains (https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djjjkFjkX6JVDMhYP?e=vJe9gF) bordering the faulted Rhine Rift valley in Europe,
(iii) Salt Range of Pakistan (https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djjd3fk7vuC-cNSou?e=D97oNz) etc.
* There is difference of opinions among the scientists regarding the origin of block moun tains. There are two theories for the origin of these mountains viz. (1) fault theory and (ii) erosion theory.
Block Mountains: origin : fault theory?
Most of the geologists are of the opinion that block mountains are formed due to faulting.
- The structural patterns of Great Basin Range mountains (https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djjmAKCEUQhE8hcU0?e=uy0st4) of Utah province (USA) were closely studied by Clarence King and G.K. Gilbert who named these mountains as faulted blocks (between 1870 and 1875 A.D.). Since then the mountains formed due to large-scale faulting were named block mountains.
- Later on G.D. Louderback opined that Basin Range mountains were formed due to faulting and tilting in the ground surface.
- W.M.Davis also advocated for the fault theory of the origin of block mountains.
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiDf2DbNU5FuZrLu?e=DJMKjP
Block mountains are formed in a number of ways.
(i) Block mountains are formed due to up ward movement of middle block between two normal faults (fig. 13.1). The upthrown block is also called as horst. The summital area of such block mountain is of flat surface but the side slopes are very steep.
(ii) Block mountains may be formed when the side blocks of two faults move downward whereas the middle block remains stable at its place (fig. 13.1B). It is apparent that the middle block projects above the surrounding surface because of downward movement of side blocks. Such block mountains are generally formed in high plateaus or broad domes.
(iii) Block mountains may be formed when the middle block between two normal faults moves downward. Thus, the side blocks become horsts and block mountains (fig. 13.1C). Such mountains are associated with the formation of rift valleys.
Block Mountains: origin : Erosion Theory?
J.F. Spurr, on the basis of detailed study of Great Basin Range mountains of the USA, opined that these mountains were not formed due to faulting and tilting, rather they were formed due to differential erosion. According to Spurr the mountains, after their origin in Mesozoic era, were subjected to intense erosion. Consequently, differential erosion resulted into the formation of existing denuded Great Basin Range mountains.
It may be pointed out that erosion theory of the origin of block mountains is not acceptable to most of the scientists because they believe that denudation may modify mountains but cannot form a mountain. In fact, deformatory process play major role in the origin of block mountains.
Folded Mountains: intro?
- Folded mountains are formed due to folding of crustal rocks by compressive forces generated by endogenetic forces.
- These are the highest and most extensive mountains of the world and are found in all the continents.
- The distributional pattern of folded mountains over the globe denotes the fact that they are generally found along the margins of the continents either in north south direction or east-west direction.
- Rockies, Andes, Alps, Himalayas, Atlas etc. are the examples of folded mountains.
- Folded mountains are classified on various bases as follows.
- Folded mountains are divided into 2 broad categories on the basis of the nature of folds.
- Simple folded mountains with open folds- Such mountains are characterized by well developed system of anticlines and synclines wherein folds are arranged in wave-like pattern. These mountains have open and relatively simple fols.
- Complex folded mountains represent very complex structure of in tensely compressed folds. Such complex structure of folds is called ‘nappe’. In fact, complex folded mountains are formed due to the formation of recumbent folds caused by powerful compressive forces.
- Folded mountains are classified on the basis of age into
- young folded mountains (which are least affected by denudational processes) and
- mature folded mountains. Mature folded mountains are characterized by monoclinal ridges and valleys.
- It may be pointed out that it is difficult to find true young folded mountains because the process of mountain building is exceedingly slow process and thus denudational processes start denuding the mountains right from the beginning of their origin.
- On the basis of the period of origin folded mountains are divided into
- old folded mountains: All the old folded mountains were originated before Tertiary period. The folded mountains of Caledonian and Hercynian mountain building periods come under this category. These mountains have been so greatly denuded that they have now become relict folded mountains, for example, Aravallis, Vindhyachal etc.
- new folded mountains. The Alpine folded mountains of Tertiary period are grouped under the category of new folded mountains, for example, Rockies, Andes, Alps, Himala yas etc.
- Folded mountains are divided into 2 broad categories on the basis of the nature of folds.
Folded Mountains: characterestics?
(1) Folded mountains are the youngest mountains on the earth’s surface.
(2) The lithological characteristics of folded mountains reveal that these have been formed due to folding of sedimentary rocks by strong compressive forces. The fossils, found in the rocks of folded mountains denote the fact that the sedimentary rocks of these mountains were formed due to deposition and consolidation of sediments in water bodies mainly in oceanic environment because the argillaceous rocks of folded mountains contain marine fossils.
(3) Sediments are found upto greater depths, thousands of metres (more than 12,000 metres). Based on this fact some scientists have opined that the sediments involved in the formation of sedimen Lary rocks of folded mountains might have been deposited in deep oceanic areas but the marine fossils found in the rocks belong to such marine organisms which can survive only in shallow water or shallow sea. It means that the sedimentary rocks of folded mountains were deposited in shallow seas.
The sea bottoms were subjected to continuous subsidence due to gradual sedimentation. Thus, the greater thickness of sediments could be possible due to continuous sedimentation and subsidence and consequent consolidation of sediments due to ever increasing superincumbent load.
(4) Folded mountains extend for greater lengths but their widths are far smaller than their lengths, For example, the Himalayas extend from west to east for a length of 2400 km (1500 miles) but their north south width is only 400 km (250 miles). It means that folded mountains have been formed in long narrow and shallow seas. Such water bodies have been termed geosynclines and it has been established that ‘out of geosynclines have come out the mountains’ or ‘geosynclines have been cradles of mountains. According to PG. Worcester all great folded mountains stand on the sites of former geosynclines”
(5) Folded mountains are generally round in arch shape having one side concave slope and the other side convex slope
(6) Folded mountains are found along the margins of the continents facing oceans. For example, Rockies and Andes are located along the western margins of North and South Americas respectively and face Pacific Ocean. They are located in two directions eg. north-south (e.g. Rockies and Andes) and west-east directions (e.g. Himalayas). The Alpine mountains are located along the southern margin of Europe facing Mediterranean sea. If we consider former Tethys Sea, then the Himalayas were also located along the margins of the continent
Geosyncline: about?
- The geological history of the continents and ocean basins denotes the fact that in the beginning our globe was characterized by two important features viz.
- rigid masses and
- (ii) geosynclines.
- Rigid masses representing the ancient nuclei of the present continents, have remained stable for considerably longer periods of time. These rigid masses are supposed to have been surrounded by mobile zones of water characterized by extensive sedimentation. These mobile zones of water have been termed ‘geosynclines’ which have now been converted by compressive forces into folded mountain ranges.
- On an average, a geosyncline means a water depression characterized by sedimentation. It has now been accepted by majority of the geologists and geographers that all the mountains have come out of the geosynclines and the rocks of the mountains originated as sediments were deposited and later on consolidated in sinking seas, now known as geosynclines. If we consider the height and thickness of sediments of the young folded mountains of Tertiary period (e.g. Rockies, Andes, Alps, Himala yas etc.), then it appears that the geosynclines should have been very deep water bodies but the marine fossils found in the sedimentary rocks of these folded mountains belong to the category of marine organisms of shallow seas. It is, thus, obvious that the geosynclines are shallow water bodies characterized by gradual sedimentation and subsidence
- Based on above facts geosynclines can now be defined as follows: Geosynclines are long but narrow and shallow water depressions characterized by sedimenta tion and subsidence
- The following are the general characteristics of geosynclines.
- Geosynclines are long, narrow and shallow depressions of water.
- These are characterized by gradual sedimentation and subsidence.
- The nature and patterns of geosynclines have not remained the same throughout geological history rather these have widely changed. In fact, the location, shape, dimension and extent of geosynclines have considerably changed due to earth movements and geological process.
- Geosynclines are mobile zones of water.
- Geosynclines are generally bordered by two rigid masses which are called forelands.
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: list?
- Concept of Hall and Dana
- Concept of E. Haug
- Concept of JW Evans
- Schuchert’s classification
- Concept of Arthur Holmes
- Concept of H. Stille
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: Concept of Hall and Dana?
studied the folded mountains and postulated that the sediments of the rocks of folded mountains were of marine origin. These rocks are deposited in long, narrow and shallow seas. Dana named such water bodies as geosynclines. He defined, for the first time. geosynclines as long, narrow and shallow and sink ing beds of seas.
Hall elaborated the concept of geosynclines as advanced by Dana. He presented ample evidences to show relationship between geosynclines and folded mountains. He opined that the rocks of folded moun tains were deposited in shallow seas. According to Hall the beds of geosynclines are subjected to sub sidence due to continuous sedimentation but the depth of water in the geosynclines remains the same
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiF-oheZvUotX2Ii?e=bFksVu
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: E. Haug?
- ‘If the idea of geosynclines is due to Hall and Dana, the theory of their development is really due to Haug”.
- He defined geosynclines as long and deep water bodies.
- According to Haug ‘geosynclines are relatively deep water areas and they are much longer than they are wide.
- He drew the palaeogeographical maps of the world and depicted long and narrow oceanic tracts to demonstrate the facts that these water tracts were subsequently folded into mountain ranges (fig. 13.3).
- He further postulated that the positions of the present day mountains were previously occupied by oceanic tracts i.e. geosynclines. Geosynclines existed as mobile zones of water between rigid masses.
- He identified 5 major rigid masses during Mesozoic era e.g. (1) North Atlantic Mass, (ii) Sino-Siberian Mass, (iii) Africa-Brazil Mass, (iv) Australia-India-Mada gascar Mass and (v) Pacific Mass. He located 4 geosynclines between these ancient rigid masses e.g. (1) Rockies geosyncline, (ii) Ural geosyncline, (iii) Tethys geosyncline and (iv) Circum-Pacific geosyncline.
- According to Haug there is systematic sedimentation in the geosynclines. The littoral margins of the geosynclines are affected by transgressional and regressional phases of the seas. The marginal areas of the geosynclines have shallow water where in larger sediments are deposited whereas finer sediments are deposited in central parts of the geosynclines.
- The sediments are squeezed and folded into mountain ranges due to compressive forces coming from the margins of the geosynclines.
- He has further remarked that it is not always necessary that all the geosynclines may pass through the complete cycle of the processes of sedimentation, subsidence, compression and folding of sediments. Some times, no mountains are formed from the geosynclines inspite of continuous sedimentation for long duration of geological time.
- Crticism: Though the contributions of Haug in this regard are praiseworthy as he developed the concept of geosynclines but his theory suffers from certain serious drawbacks and confusing ideas about them.
- His palaeogeographical map (fig. 13.3) of Mesozoic era depicted unbelievable larger extent of rigid masses (land areas) in comparison to geosynclines (oceanic areas). Questions arise, as to what happened to such extensive land masses after Mesozoic era? Where did they disappear? Haug could not explain these and many more Questions.
- His geosynclines as very deep oceanic tracts are also not acceptable because the marine fossils found in the folded mountains belong to the group of marine organisms of shallow seas
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiLiOH-kqmbuHQ3z?e=w4jIPE
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: JW Evans?
- According to Evans the geosynclines are so varied that it becomes difficult to present their definite form and location. The form and shape of geosynclines change with changing environmental conditions.
- A geosyncline may be narrow or wide. It may be of different shapes.
- There may be several alternative situations of geosynclines e.g. (1) it maybe between two land masses (example, Tethys geosyncline between Laurasia and Gondwanaland), (ii) it may be in front of a mountain or a plateau (for example, resultant long trench after the origin of the Himalayas, this depression was later on filled with sediments to form Indo-Gangetic Plains), (iii) it may be along the margins of the continents, (iv) it may be in front of a river mouth etc.
- The beds of geosynclines are subjected to gradual subsidence because of sedimentation. According to Evans all the geosynclines irrespective of their varying forms, shapes and locations are characterized by twin proc esses of sedimentation and subsidence.
- Geosynclines, after long period of sedimentation, are squeezed and folded into mountain ranges.
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: Schuchert?
He attempted to classify geosynclines on the basis of their characteristics related to their size, location, evolutionary history etc. He has divided geosynclines into 3 categories.
-
Monogeosynclines
- are exceptionally long and narrow but shallow water tracts as conceived by Hall and Dana.
- The geosynclinal beds are subjected to continuous subsidence due to gradual sedimentation and resultant load.
- Such geosynclines are situated either within a continent or along its borders.
- These are called mono because they pass through only one cycle of sedimentation and mountain building.
- Applachian geosyncline is considered to be the best example of monogeosynclines. In place of the Applachians (USA) there existed a long and narrow Appalachian geosyncline during pre Cambrian period. The geosyncline was bordered by highland mass known as Applachia in the east. Applachian geosynclines were folded from Ordovician to Permian periods.
-
Polygeosynclines
- were long and wide water bodies. These were definitely broader than the monogeosynclines.
- These geosynclines existed for relatively longer period than the monogeosynclines and these have passed through complex evolutionary histories.
- These are considered to have experienced more than one phase of orogenesis, consequently they may have been diversified by the production of one or more parallel geanticlines arising from their floors in the squeezing process’.
- They originated in positions similar to those of monogeosynclines.
- Rocky and Ural geosynclines are quoted as the representative examples of polygeosynclines.
- Mesogeosynclines
- are very long, narrow and mobile ocean basins which are bordered by continents from all sides.
- They are characterized by great abyssal depth and long and complex geological histories.
- These geosynclines pass through several geosynclinal phases e g. phases of sedimentation, subsidence and folding.
- Mesogeosynclines are similar to the geosynclines conceived by Haug.
- Tethys geosyncline is the typical example of such type. Mediterranean Sea is the remnant of Tethys geosyncline. This geosyncline was folded into Alpine mountains of Europe and the Himalayas of Asia. The unfolded remaining portion of Tethys geosyncline became Mediterranean sea, an example of median mass of Kober.
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: Arthur Holmes?
- Besides describing main characteristics of geosynclines, A. Holmes has also elaborated the causes of the origin of different types of geosynclines. He has also described the detailed processes and mechanisms of sedimentation and subsidence and consequent orogenesis.
- According to him no doubt sedimentation leads to subsidence but this process cannot account for the greater thickness of sediments in geosynclines rather earth movements can cause subsidence of high magnitude in the geosynclinal beds. He further pointed out that the process of subsidence of the geosynclinal beds was not a sudden process rather it was a gradual process. The deposition of sediments upto the thickness of 12,160 m (40,000 feet) in the Applachian geosyncline could be possible during a long period of 3,000,000,000 years from Cambrian period to early Permian period at the rate of one foot of sedimentation every 7,500 years.
- Holmes has identified 4 major types of geosynclines and has described the mode of their origin separately as given below
-
Formation of Geosynclines due to Migration of Magma-
- According to Holmes the crust of the earth is composed of 3 shells of rocks. Just below the outer thin sedimentary layer lies (1) outer layer of granodiorite (thickness, 10 to 12 km), followed by (ii) an intermediate layer of amphibolite (thickness, 20-25 km), and (iii) a lower layer of eclogite and some peridotite.
- He has further pointed out that migration of magmas from the intermediate layer to neighbouring areas causes collapse and subsidence of upper or outer layer and thus is formed a geosyncline.
- It may be summarized that some geosynclines are formed due to displacement of light magmas and consequent subsidence of crustal surface.
- Present Coral Sea, Tasman Sea, Arafura Sea, Weddell Sea and Ross Sea have been quoted as typical examples of such geosyncline. (Location of these seas: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djjo0EM8qj4heM1rW?e=kDgEJ9)
- This concept of Holmes has been severely criticised because the transfer and displacement of magmas cannot cause subsidence to form geosynclines.
-
Formation of Geosynclines due to Metamorphism-
- According to Holmes the rocks of the lower layer of the crust, as referred to above, are metamorphosed due to compression caused by converging convective currents.
- This matamorphism increases the density of rocks, with the result the lower layer of the crust is subjected to subsidence and thus a geosyncline is formed.
- Caribbean Sea, the western Mediterranean Sea and Banda Sea have been quoted as examples of this category of geosynclines.
- This concept has been rejected on the ground that compression caused by convergent con vective currents would not cause metamorphism rather it would cause melting of rocks due to resultant high temperature.
-
Formation of Geosynclines due to Compression -
- Some geosynclines are formed due to compression and resultant subsidence of outer layer of the crust caused by convergent convective currents,
- Persian Gulf and Indo-Gangetic trough are considered to be typical examples of this group of geosynclines.
-
Formation of Geosynclines due to Thinning of Sialic Layer-
- According to Holmes there may be two possibilities if a column of rising convective currents diverges after reaching the lower layer of the crust in opposite directions.
- The sialic layer is stretched apart due to tensile forces exerted by diverging convective currents. This process causes thinning of sialic layer which results in the creation of a geosyncline. The former Tethys geosyncline is considered to have been formed in this manner.
- Alternatively, the continental mass may be separated due to enormous tensile force generated by divergent convective currents. Former Ural geosyncline is supposed to have been formed due to this mechanism.
-
Formation of Geosynclines due to Migration of Magma-
Geosyncline: Theories and Geographers’ concept: H. Stille?
- Stille has classified geosynclines based on intermittent volcanic activity during their infilling phase
-
H. Stille presented a significant classification of geosynclines. He divided the earth’s crust into two major divisions called Cratons and Ortho-geosyncline.
- Ortho-geosynclines were depressions that separated cratons
- Cratons are further sub-divided into hochkraton (i.e. stable continental crust) and fiefkraton (i.e. stable oceanic crust).
- (in my words, cratons are like plates and orthogeosynclines are depressions betn them)
-
Ortho-geosyncline consiste of two parallel depressions and thus are subdivided into miogeosynclines and eugeosynclines.
- Eugeosynclines are characterized by intermittent volcanic activity during the process of sedimentation, whereas miogeosynclines have low volcanic activity.
- The two classes are found side by side separated by a geanticline in the middle. Miogeosynclines are now considered to be former continental margins like those fringing the Atlantic Ocean and eugeosynclines represent the inverted and deformed equivalents of ocean basins of smaller magnitude such as the marginal basins of the western part of the Pacific, the Sea of Japan, and the Sea of Okhotsk.
- So in place of Geosynclines, he suggested ‘Geoclines’ because the geosynclinal structure is not a two sided trough rather it is open towards ocean
3 stages of origin of Geosyncline?
The geosynclinal history is divided into three stages viz.
- lithogenesis : the stage of creation of geosynclines, sedimentation and subsidence of the beds of geosynclines,
- Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiO9VuGsqBvCQZyV?e=79uKec
- orogenesis: the stage of squeezing and folding of geosynclinal sediments into mountain ranges
- Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiQ8Z7OznpX8rz9v?e=ismqyR
- gliptogenesis: the stage of gradual rise of mountains, and their denudation and consequent lowering of their height
These stages would be elaborated during the discussion of geosynclinal theory of Kober
Folded mountain building theories: list?
- horizontal forces
- horizontal movement due to contraction of earth caused by cooling
- Geosynclinal theory of Kober
- Thermal contraction theory by Jeffrys
- horizontal moevemnt due to continental drift and movement of earth crust
- contienental drift theory of Taylor and Wegner
- Sliding continent theory of Daly
- radioactivity theory of Joly
- Thermal convection current theory by A. Holmes
- Plate tectonic theory
- horizontal movement due to contraction of earth caused by cooling
- vertical forces theories
- eg. undulation and oscillation theory by Harmon
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: intro
Famous German geologist Kober has presented a detailed and systematic description of the surface features of the earth in his book ‘Der Bau der Erde’.
His main objective was to establish relationship between ancient rigid masses or table lands and more mobile zones or geosynclines, which he called ‘orogen.’
Kober not only attempted to explain the origin of the mountains on the basis of his geosynclinal theory but he also attempted to elaborate the various aspects of mountain building e.g. formation of mountains, their geological history and evolution and development. He considered the old rigid masses as the foundation stones of the present continents.
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: diagram?
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: assumptions?
- The driving force behind compression in his theory is the force of contraction produced by cooling of earth
- According to him present continents have grown out of rigid masses. According to Kober there were mobile zones of water in the places of present-day mountains. He called mobile zones of water as geosynclines or orogen (the place of mountain building). These mobile zones of geosynclines were surrounded by rigid masses which were termed by Kober as ‘kratogen’.
- The old rigid masses included Canadian Shield, Baltic Shield or Russian Massif. Siberian Shield, Chinese Massif, Peninsular India, African Shield, Brazilian Mass, Australian and Antarctic rigid masses.
- According to Kober mid-Pacific geosyncline separated north and south Pacific forelands which were later on foundered to form Pacific Ocean.
- Eight morphotectonic units can be identified on the basis of the description of the surface features of the earth during Mesozoic era as presented by Kober e.g. (1) Africa together with some parts of Atlantic and Indian Oceans, (ii) Indian Australian land mass, (iii) Eurasia, (iv) North Pacific continent, (v) South Pacific continent, (vi) South America and Antarctica etc.
- He defined the process of mountain building or orogenesis as that process which links rigid masses with geosynclines. In other words, mountains are formed from the geosynclines due to the impacts of rigid masses.
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: mechanism?
- Kober has opined that mountains are formed out of geosynclines. According to Kober geosynclines, (known as orogen) are long and wide water areas characterized by sedimentation and subsidence.
- He described the whole process of mountain building through three closely linked stages of lithogenesis, orogenesis and Gliptogenesis
- Lithogenesis:
- preparatory stage of mt building
- The geosynclines are long and wide mobile zones of water which are bordered by rigid masses, which have been named by Kober as forelands or kratogen.
- These upstanding land masses or forelands are subjected to continuous erosion by fluvial processes and eroded materials are deposited in the geosynclines. This process of sediment deposition is called sedimentation.
- The everincreasing weight of sediments due to gradual sedimentation exerts enormous pressure on the beds of geosynclines, with the result the beds of geosynclines are subjected to gradual subsidence. This process is known as the process of subsidence
- These twin processes of sedimentation and resultant subsidence result in the deposition of enormous volume of sediments and attainment of great thick ness of sediments in the geosynclines.
- Orogenesis:
- Both the forelands start to move towards each other be cause of horizontal movements caused by the force of contraction resulting from the cooling of the earth.
- The compressive forces generated by the movement of forelands together cause contraction, squeezing and ultimately folding of geosynclinal sediments to form mountain ranges.
- The parallel ranges formed on either side of the geosyncline have been termed by Kober as randketten (marginal ranges)
- If compressive forces are weak or moderate, only the marginal sediments of the geosyncline are folded to form two marginal randketten (marginal ranges) and middle portion of the geosyncline remains unaffected by folding activity (thus remains unfolded). This unfolded middle portion is called zwischengebirge (betwixt-mountains) or median mass
- Alternatively, if the compressive forces are acute, the whole of geosynclinal sediments are compressed, squeezed, buckled and ultimately folded and both the forelands are closeted. This process introduces complexity in the mountains because acute com pression results in the formation of recumbent folds and nappes.
- Gliptogenesis: characterized by gradual rise of mountains and their denu dation by fluvial and other processes. Continuous denudation results in gradual lowering of the height of mountains.
- Kober has identified 6 major periods of mountain building.
- Three mountain building periods, about which very little is known, are reported to have occurred during pre-Cambrian period.
- Palaeozoic era saw two major mountain building periods - the Caledonian orogenesis was completed by the end of Silurian period and the Variscan orogeny was culmi nated in Permo-Carboniferous period.
- The last (6th) orogenic activity known as Alpine orogeny was completed during Tertiary epoch
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: examples from mountains around the world?
- According to Kober the Alpine mountain chains of Europe can well be explained on the basis of median masses.
- According to him Tethys geosyncline was bordered by European land mass in the north and by African rigid mass in the south. The sediments of Tethys geosyncline were compressed and folded due to movement of European landmass (foreland) and African rigid mass (foreland) together in the form of Alpine mountain system
- According to Kober the Alpine mountain chains were formed because of compressive forces coming from two sides (north and south).
- Betic Cordillera, Pyrenees, Province ranges, Alps- proper, Carpathians, Balkan moun tains and Caucasus mountains were formed due to northward movement of African foreland (fig. 13.8).
- On the other hand, Atlas mountain (north-west Africa), Apennines, Dinarides, Hellenides and Taurides were formed due to southward movement of European landmass
- The median masses located in the Alpine mountain system: Hungarian median mass is located between two mountain ranges- Carppathians and Dinaric Alps (Dinarides)- folding in opp directions i.e. N & S
- Mediterranean Sea is in fact an example of median mass between Pyreness Provence Ranges in the north and Atlas mountains and their eastern extension in the south. Corsica and Sardinia are remnants of this median mass.
- Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiVw8Jq35K92_7UM?e=RcWy0a
- Mountains on Europe map: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djju5FazJC9iRCzbD?e=zv2ZWS
- European Mts. : https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djjx_MqAWSKYUWnCT?e=LnAF1r
- Asian Mountain Range
- Anatolian plateau between Pantic and Taurus ranges is another example of median mass.
- Similarly, further east ward, Iranian plateau is a median mass between Zagros and Elburz mountains.
- Asiatic Alpine ranges begin from Asia minor and run upto Sunda Island in the East Indies.
- Asiatic folded mountains including the Himalaya were formed due to compression and folding of sediments of Tethys geosyncline caused by the movement of Angaraland and Gondwana Forelands together
- ranges, which were formed by the northward compression, include Caucasus, Pantic and Taurus (of Turkey), Kunlun, Yannan and Annan ranges,
- ranges, which were formed by the southward compression, include Zagros and Elburz of Iran. Oman ranges, Himalayas, Burmese ranges
- Tibetan plateau is a fine example of median mass between Kunlun-Tien-Shan and the Himalayas.
- Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djibJuYx13BmLtv7H?e=WbJ2CP
- Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djj0qX2R8ptyI9sCg?e=ZtMYXP
Geosynclinal theory of Kober: Median Mass?
If compressive forces are weak or moderate, only the marginal sediments of the geosyncline are folded to form two marginal randketten (marginal ranges) and middle portion of the geosyncline remains unaffected by folding activity (thus remains unfolded). This unfolded middle portion is called zwischengebirge (betwixt-mountains) or median mass
median mass may be in various forms e.g.
(i) in the form of plateau (examples, Tibetan plateau between Kunlun and Himalaya, Iranian plateau between Zagros and Elburz, Anatolian plateau between Pantic and Taurus, Basin Range between Wasatch ranges and Seirra Navada in the USA):
(ii) in the form of plain (example, Hungarian plain between Carpathians and Dinaric Alps), and
(iii) in the form of seas (examples. Mediterranean Sea be tween African Atlas mountains and European Al pine mountains, Caribbean Sea between the moun tain ranges of middle America and West Indies).
Geosynclinal theory of Kober:evaluation?
Though Kober’s geosynclinal theory satisfac torily explains a few aspects of mountain building but the theory suffers from certain weaknesses
- The force of contraction, as envisaged by Kober, is not sufficient to cause mountain building In fact, very extensive and gigantic mts. like the Alps, the Himalayas, the Rockies and the Andes cannot be formed by the force of contraction gener ated by cooling of the earth
- Kober’s theory some how explains the west-east extending mountains but north-south extending mountains (Rockies and Andes) cannot be explained on the basis of this theory
Inspite of a few inherent limitations and weaknesses Kober is given credit for advancing the idea of the formation of mountains from geosynclinal sediments
Thermal Contraction Theory of Jeffreys: intro?
Jeffreys, a strong exponent of contraction theory, postulated his ‘thermal contraction theory’ to explain the origin and evolution of major reliefs of the earth’s surface (continents, ocean basins, mountains, island arcs and festoons) but his major objective was to explain the origin and distributional patterns of mountain systems of the globe.
Thermal Contraction Theory of Jeffreys: axioms?
- The forces responsible for mountain building process were
- forces coming through the cooling of earth, which resulted in contraction
- force created due to slowing down of earth’s rotation, which resulted in contraction of earth’s diameter
- earth is composed of several concentric shells.
- The cooling and resultant contraction takes place layer after layer but the cooling is effective upto the depth of only 700 km from the earth’s surface.
Thermal Contraction Theory of Jeffreys: mechanism?
- Within the zone of 700 km from the earth’s surface every upper layer has cooled earlier and more than the layer immediately below the upper layer. As a result it contracted more than the lower layer as well. After maximum cooling and resultant contraction of the upper layer lower layer just lying below the upper layer begins to cool and contract, with the result already cooled and contracted upper layer becomes too large to fit in with the still cooling and contracting lower layer.
- The layer lying over the level of no strain is too big to fit with the lower layer and hence the upper layer has to collapse on the lower layer so that it can fit with the lower layer. This process (collapse of upper layer on lower layer) results in the decrease in the radius of the earth which causes horizontal compressive stress which leads to buckling and folding of the rocks of upper layer. Thus, the mountains are formed. Further the lower layer stretches which causes fractures and fissures resulting into breaking of rocks. This mechanism allows further collapse of the already cooled outer layer and thus already formed mountains are subjected to further rise in height.
- Period of Mountain Building
- the process of aforesaid mechanism of mountain building is not always active throughout the geological periods rather is confined to certain periods only.
- There is continuous accumulation of compressive and tensile forces resulting from contraction of the earth due to cooling and this process continues until the accumulated forces exceed the rock strength.
- When this state (when accumulated compressive and tensile forces exceed the rock strength) is reached, folding and faulting are introduced and the process of mountain building sets in and this process continues till the compressive and tensile forces are strong and active. When these forces become weak, mountain building stops and the period of quiescence sets in.
- zones of Mountain building: According to Jeffreys mountain building depends upon the nature and strength of rocks. The areas having soft and elastic rocks are most affected by the process of mountain building as the rocks are easily folded by compressive forces caused by contraction but the regions having hard and less elastic rocks are affected by tensile forces and thus several faults and fractures are formed because such rocks are easily broken into blocks. It is, thus, apparent that mountain building is localized in certain zones of the globe.
- Direction of Force:
- The cooling process was more active below the oceanic crust than the continental crust because of dissimilar structure of these two zones.
- Thus, the rocks below the oceanic crust experienced more cooling and contraction than the rocks below the continental crust. Thus, the force of contraction is directed from oceanic crust towards the continental crust. This mechanism results in the formation of mountains along the continental margins parallel to the oceans. Rockies and Andes are the examples of such situation.
- the compressive force generated by contraction of the earth due to cooling was directed from oceanic areas towards the continental areas almost at right angle and thus the mountain ranges were formed parallel to the oceanic areas.
Thermal Contraction Theory of Jeffreys: Evaluation?
- The force of contraction resulting from the cooling of the earth is not sufficient enough to account for the origin and evolution of major surface reliefs of the globe. A. Holmes has remarked that ‘the calculated reduction of area (by Jeffreys) is seriously in deficit of the amount to explain mountain building.’
- The concept of cooling of the earth in the system of concentric shells (layers) is erroneous and is not acceptable.
- The impact of decrease in the speed of rotation of the earth on mountain building is doubtful.
- As per thermal contraction theory of Jeffreys the continents and oceans should have been uniformly distributed as the earth was contracted from all sides but presently there is uneven distribution of continents and oceans.
- According to this theory the situation of mountains should always be parallel to the oceans. The arrangement of the Rockies and Andes is justified on the basis of this theory but the arrangement of European Alpine mountains and the Himalayas cannot be explained.
- According to this theory there should not be any definitive distributional pattern of mountains as they may be formed everywhere because all parts of earth’s crust experienced contraction but contrary to this mountains are found in certain patterns e.g., along the margins of the consents extending either north- southward or west-eastward.
Continental slide theory of Daly: intro?
Daly postulated his theory of sliding conti nents in his book ‘Our Mobile Earth’ in the year 1926 to explain the origin and evolution of different relief features of the earth’s surface.
He attempted to explain salient aspects of folded mountains e.g. origin, successive upheavals, distributional patterns and orientation and extent.
Continental slide theory of Daly: diagram?
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djim2sGxtQajo3vQf?e=jTEPbS
Continental slide theory of Daly: axioms?
- According to Daly a solid crust was formed just after the origin of the earth. He named this solid crust as primitive crust.
- In early times there existed a series of ancient rigid masses which were generally situated near the poles and around the equator. These rigid masses have been named by Daly as polar and equatorial domes. Thus, there were three belts of rigid masses e.g. (i) north polar domes, (ii) equato rial domes and (iii) south polar domes.
- These three belts of rigid masses were separated by depressed regions which were called by Daly as midlatitude furrows and primeval Pacific Ocean. These de pressed regions were, in fact, oceanic areas (or say geosynclines) the beds of which were formed of primitive crust which was formed with the origin of the earth.
- The crust was composed of heavier granites while the substratum was formed of lighter glassy basalt. this view of Daly is isostatically totally wrong.
- He further assumed that the water bodies occupied about half of the globe and Tethys geosyncline (northern mid latitude furrow between north polar dome and equa torial dome) ‘was a marked feature throughout much of geological time.’
- Land masses (polar equatorial domes - rigid masses) projected above the water bodies and the polar and equatorial domes were sloping towards mid-latitude furrows (which were in fact geosynclinal tracts) and the Pacific Ocean.
Continental slide theory of Daly: mechanism?
- The main force implied by Daly for the origin of the mountains has been the force of gravity. The whole theory of Daly is based on the nature and rate of downward slide of the continents fostered by gravitational force.
- Daly has believed in the collapse of the primitive crust but has not elaborated the mechanism of collapse. It may be surmised that the primitive crust would have been probably bad conductor of heat and so the surface temperature would have fallen soon to that of the present time but the loss of heat from the interior into the exterior part continued and hence the interior part contracted away from the outer shell or crust. Consequently, the outer crust would have collapsed on the still contracting interior due to (i) the weight of the oceanic water, (ii) the weight of geosynclinal sediments and (iii) gravitational force of the centre of the earth. It may be pointed out that the impact of gravitational force was more under the oceanic crust than the continental domes because the former was nearer to the earth’s centre. It appears (though not described by Daly) that the mid-latitudinal furrows were formed as geosynclines due to collapse of outer crust on the contracting interior of the earth and due to the gravitational force coming from the centre of the earth.
- The sediments derived through the erosion of polar and equatorial domes were deposited by the rivers into the mid-latitudinal furrows and the Pacific Ocean (geosynclines). Continuous sedimentation and weight of the oceanic waters exerted enormous pressure on the beds of oceans (geosynclines) with the result their beds were subjected to continuous subsidence,
- The resultant subsidence of geosynclinal beds caused lateral pressure on the continental masses, with the result they were transformed into broad continental domes known as polar and equatorial domes. As the oceanic beds were depressed downward due to gravitational force of the earth’s centre, and weight of oceanic water and geosynclinal sediments, the size of domes continued to increase.
- The sediments of the continental domes began to expand because of increase in the size and height of the domes and consequently sediments of the domes began to lose weight and became lighter in weight.
- In order to compensate the loss of weight of sediments of the continental domes there began underground flowage of dense materials from below the oceanic (geosynclinal beds) beds towards the continental domes. Because of this process denser materials began to accumulate in the continental domes from below.
- Because of the repetition of the above processes the continental domes continued to grow in size and height, probably not as rapidly in the centre as towards their peripheries’. The increase in the size of domes caused pressure on the crust under the oceanic beds (geosynclinal beds). As the size of domes continued to expand, the resultant pressure on oceanic beds also continued to increase. When the tolerance limit of the oceanic crust to withstand the ever increasing pressure was crossed, the oceanic beds began to rupture and break.
- Thus, the support of the continental domes was removed due to rupture of the oceanic beds which introduced strong tensional movements due to which larger blocks of continental mass began to slide towards the geosynclines. The geosynclinal sediments were thus squeezed and folded due to compressive force coming from the sliding continental blocks (fig. 13.10) giving birth to folded mountains.
- It is, thus, obvious that greater the amount of slipping of continental blocks, the more geosynclinal sediments are squeezed and more and greater folded mountains are formed.
- Daly has fur ther pointed out that the foundered continental blocks in the substratum are melted due to high temperature and thus rise in the volume of molten continental blocks causes further rise in the mountains.
Continental slide theory of Daly: pros?
- The sliding continent theory of Daly also well explains the distributional patterns of folded mountains e.g. north-south and west-east extents.
- Accord ing to Daly folded mountains are formed because of squeezing and folding of geosynclinal sediments by compressive forces caused by sliding of the continental blocks towards the geosynclines. Thus,
- west east extending mountains (e.g. Alpine chains and the Himalayas) were formed due to sliding of polar and equatorial domes towards mid-latitude furrow (Tethys geosyncline)
- north-south extending mountains (e.g. Rockies and Andes) were formed due to sliding of continental masses towards Pacific Ocean.
- Simi larly, the island arcs and festoons parallel to the Asiatic coast were formed due to sliding of Asiatic mass towards Pacific Ocean.
Continental slide theory of Daly: cons?
- The sliding continent theory presents erroneous concepts about the structure of the interior of the earth. His concept, that the outer crust is denser than the substratum, is against the evidences of seismology because it is now proven fact that the density increases with increasing depth in the inte rior of the earth.
- Daly’s theory is based on several guesses and surmises. Why did the earth’s crust become asymmetrical? Why the continental domes were sloping towards mid-latitude furrows (geosynclines)? How was the Pacific Ocean formed? Daly does not offer any convincing explanation to these and many more questions.
- This theory presents erroneous views about geosynclines because these are generally considered as long, narrow and relatively shallow depressions of water but Daly’s geosynclines were in fact oceans (e.g. mid-latitude furrows and Pacific Ocean). If these are accepted as geosynclines they would have never been filled with sediments and thus no moun tains could have been formed.
- The theory provides wrong views about the mechanism and process of gravity. The theory does not throw light on the termination of pulling effects of gravity and the beginning of the rupture of the beds of the geosynclines. Thus, there is no coherence between different events related to moun tain building as envisaged by the sliding continent theory. In fact, the theory presents some piecemeal analysis of mountain building rather than a complete or perfect perspective.
Thermal Convection Current Theory: intro?
Arthur Holmes postulated his thermal con vection current theory in the year 1928-29 to explain the intricate problems of the origin of major relief features of the earth’s surface.
Holmes’ major objec tives were not confined to search the mechanism of mountain building based on sound scientific back ground but were also directed towards finding scien tific explanation for the origin of the continents and ocean basins in terms of continental drift as he was opposed to the concept of permanency of the conti nents and ocean basins as envisaged by the advo cates of thermal contraction of the earth.
Thermal Convection Current Theory: axioms/basic assumptions?
- According to Holmes the earth consists of 3 zones or layers
- upper layer of granodiorite (10 to 12 km),
- intermediate layer (20 to 25 km) of amphibolite and
- lower layer of eclogite.
- He has further grouped these three layers into two zones e.g. (i) crust consisting of upper and middle or intermediate layers and crystalline upper part of lower layer and (ii) substratum representing molten part of the lower layer.
- Crust and substratum are composed of sial and sima respectively.
- Generally, sial is absent in the oceanic areas.
- Convective Currents are generated within the earth due to heat generated by presence of radioactive elements in the rocks
Thermal Convection Current Theory: convective current origin?
- The origin of convective currents within the earth depends on the presence of radioactive elements in the rocks. The disintegration of radioactive elements generates heat which causes convective currents. According to Holmes there is maximum concentration of radioactive elements in the crust but temperature is not so high because there is gradual loss of heat through conduction and radiation from the upper surface.
- On the other hand, though there is very low concentration of radioactive elements in the substratum but the gradual accumulation of heat, produced by the radioactive elements causes convective currents.
- The convective currents depend on two factors (i) thickness of the crust near the equator and poles and (ii) uneven distribution of radioactive elements in the crust.
- Ascending convective currents originate under the crust near the equator because of greater thickness of crust whereas descending convection currents are originated under the polar crust because of its shallow depth.
- The rising convective currents originating from below the continental crust are more powerful than the convective currents originating from below the oceanic crust because of greater concentra tion of radioactive elements in the continental crust.
- the currents originating under the equatorial crust move towards the poles and thus the crusts are carried away with the convective currents.
-
The convective currents are divided into two groups on the basis of their locational aspect
- Convective currents of rising columns: The rising convective currents after reaching the lower limit of the crust diverge in opposite directions. This outward or divergent movement introduces tensional force due to which the crust is stretched, thinned and ultimately broken and the broken crustal blocks are moved apart. The wide open area between two drifting crustal blocks in opposite directions is filled with water and thus an ocean is formed.
- According to Holmes the equatorial crust was stretched and ruptured due to divergence of rising convective currents which carried the ruptured crustal blocks towards the north and south and Tethys Sea was formed. This phase is called ‘opening of Tethys’
- Convective currents of falling columns: This creates tensional pull on the crust above. It may result in formation of folded mountains in case the two columns are beneath continental and oceanic crust. It may also lead to closing up of oceans as happened in the case of tethys sea.
- two sets of convergent or downward moving (descending) currents brought Laurasia and Godwnaland together and thus Tethys was compressed and folded into Alpine mountains. This phase is called ‘closing of Tethys’.
- Convective currents of rising columns: The rising convective currents after reaching the lower limit of the crust diverge in opposite directions. This outward or divergent movement introduces tensional force due to which the crust is stretched, thinned and ultimately broken and the broken crustal blocks are moved apart. The wide open area between two drifting crustal blocks in opposite directions is filled with water and thus an ocean is formed.
Thus, divergent convective currents move the crustal blocks away in opposite directions and thus create seas and oceans while convergent convective currents bring crustal blocks together and thus form mountains.
- Geosynclines are always located above the descending convective currents of falling column. This is because, Geosynclines are formed due to subsidence of crustal blocks, mainly under continental shelves, due to compressive force generated by convergent convective currents moving laterally together under continental and oceanic crusts.
- The convective mechanism is not a steady process but a periodic one, which waxes and wanes and then begins again with a different arrangement of centre’. It means that the convective currents originate at several centres which are not permanent.
10. Holmes has described a cyclic pattern of thermal convective currents which includes the origin of convective currents, formation of geosynclines, sedimentation and orogenesis and further rise in the mountains.
Thermal Convection Current Theory: mechanism?
According to Holmes the cyclic pattern of convective currents and related mountain buildings pass through three phases or stages
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djiqVnwi0t8ZOGG3B?e=fyhPpZ
- First Stage of Lithogenesis: First stage is of the longest duration during which convective currents are originated in the substratum
- The first stage, characterized by high velocity convective currents, is in fact the preparatory stage of mountain building which is marked by the creation of geosynclines, sedimentation and subsidence of materials
- The rising convective currents of two centers converge under the continental shelves and thus form geosynclines due to compression coming from the convergence of two sets of lateral currents
- Geosynclines are subjected to continuous sedimentation and subsidence due to increasing incumbent load as well as because as the sediments are pressed downward into geosynclines, these go further downward and are intensely heated and metamorphose into higher density material (Amphibolites are metamorphosed into eclogites) which subsides further. Thus, the falling column of downward moving convective currents is the column of increasing density.
- Second Stage of Orogenesis: AKA stage of orogenesis.
- Second stage is marked by phenomenal increase in the velocity of convective currents but this stage is relatively of short duration.
- The main cause for the phenomenal increase in the velocity of convective currents is the downward movement of cold materials in the falling column and upward movement (rise) of hot materials in the rising column of convective currents. Increased pressure due to metamorphism of geomaterials in the falling column of descending currents increases the velocity of downward moving convective currents.
- The high velocity convergent convective currents buckle geosynclinal sediments and thus initiate the process of mountain building
- Third Stage of Gliptogenesis
- Third stage is characterized by waning phase of thermal convective currents due to incoming hot materials in the falling column and upward movement (rise) of colder materials in the rising column
- Gradually, the rising column becomes a cold column i.e., cold materials are accumulated at the centre of the origin of rising (upward moving) convective currents due to which these currents cease to operate and the whole mechanism of convective currents comes to an end.
- Due to this stoppage of covective cycle, mountains rise because of three factors
- The materials of the falling column start rising because of decrease in the pressure at the top of the falling column due to the end of deposition of materials.
- The depressed and subsided heavier materials in the falling column of descending convective currents start rising due to decrease in the weight and pressure at the top of the falling column
- Eclogite, which was depressed downward, gets melted due to immense heat and thus it expands. This expansion in the volume of molten eclogite causes further rise in the mountains
Thermal Convection Current Theory: Evaluation?
Pros
- explains all three stages of mountain building
- Griggs experiments as well as modern evidences have validated existence of convective currents
Criticism
- At the time the theory was given, it was criticised because of lack of evidence for convective currents. But it has since been validated
- The whole mechanism of convective currents depends on the heat generated by radioactive elements in the substratum (now mantle) but critics raised doubt about the availability of required amount of heat generated by radioactive elements.
- The metamorphism of amphibolites into eclogites and resultant downward movement of relatively denser eclogites is also a doubtful phenomenon. Even we accept the metamorphism of amphibolites into eclogites but the resultant increase in density from 3.0 to 3.4 would not be enough to depress and sink eclogites in the falling column. If desired sinking of eclogites is not possible, there would not be proper accommodation of materials brought by the horizontal convergent convective currents into the falling column.
- According to this theory convective currents are originated at few centres only under the continental and oceanic crusts but question arises, why are not they originated at all places? If this so happens, the horizontal movement of these currents would not be possible. The whole of the continents would be divided into several blocks as the rising convection currents originating from numerous centres would break the crusts and would give birth to volcanic eruptions of various sorts. This has now been answered by Plate tectonics - rising and falling convective currents are active at plate margins
the idea of thermal convective currents conceived by A. Holmes about 80 years ago (in 1928-29) proved its worth in 1960s when the scientists were looking forward to search such a force which can explain the movement of plates. Now, the process of mountain building can be very satisfactorily explained on the basis of convective currents though not in the way as conceived by A. Holmes in 1928-29 but on the lines of plate tectonics.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: intro?
Joly postulated his theory based on radioactivity of certain radioactive minerals in the year 1925 in his book, ‘Surface History of the Earth’ to account for the origin and evolution of surface features of the earth. His theory is also known as thermal cycle theory or theory of the surface of the earth.
Though the main objective of Joly’s theory was to present a detailed account of the thermal history of the earth and mathematical explanation of the structure of the interior of the earth but he also attempted to explain the problems of mountain building and the continental drift.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: axioms/ basic assumptions?
- the crust has been assumed to have been composed of sial and substratum of basalt (sima).
- According to Joly the rocks of the earth contain radioactive elements but their distribution is not uniform in all zones of the earth. Radioactive elements are found in abundance in sialic zone or the continental rocks but the rocks of sima forming the oceanic crusts are less radioactive.
- He assumed the maximum thickness of sial to be 30km., with no heat transfer betn sial and sima layer beneath
Radioactive Theory of Joly: summary/highlights?
- The driving force of the mountain building as invoked by Joly is provided by expansion and contraction of the substratum of the earth resulting into transgressional and regressional phases of the seas (geosynclines).
- The expansion and contraction of the substratum are based on the mechanism of heat generated by radioactive elements of the rocks.
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djivjlK2hG6A6cs9p?e=koUyRI
Radioactive Theory of Joly: radioactivity in the Interior of earth?
- The theories of both A. Holmes and Joly are based on radioactive elements but they sought their help differently e.g., Holmes used radioactive elements to explain the origin of thermal convective currents in the substratum while Joly used them to explain the melting and re-solidification of the substratum. He also implied tidal force and friction to explain continental drift.
- In order to explain various aspects of the mechanism of radioactive elements Joly has described first the structure of the earth.
- According to him continents are made of lighter sialic materials the density of which is 2.67 while the oceanic beds are formed of heavier materials of sima having average density of 3.0. Thus, the crust has been assumed to have been composed of sial and substratum of basalt (sima).
- According to Joly the rocks of the earth contain radioactive elements but their distribution is not uniform in all zones of the earth. Radioactive elements are found in abundance in sialic zone or the continental rocks but the rocks of sima forming the oceanic crusts are less radioactive.
- Continuous breakdown of certain radioactive elements like uranium, thorium etc., generates heat. Though, the actual rate of heat production by radioactive elements is exceedingly small but it becomes sufficient enough to produce appreciable result after long period of accumulation.
- Under Continents
- According to Joly the disintegration of radioactive elements of sialic or continental rocks produces heat but it does not accumulate in the continents or sial because the total loss of heat through radiation from the sialic crust
- He has further pointed out that temperature increases with increasing depth. He calculated T at 30km to be 1050°C.
- He estimated the maximum thickness of sial to be 30km. According to him there is no transfer of heat from sima to overlying sial. Thus temperature at the outer limit of sima under the continents to be 1050°C.
- Under Oceans
- Temperature increases with in- creasing depth in the substratum (sima) under the oceans because of accumulation of heat produced by radioactive elements. This mechanism causes temperature gradient at greater depth in sima
- The temperature becomes equal to the melting point of basalt. There is no transfer of heat from the lower part of sima to the upper part of sima so there is accumulation of heat in the lower layers of sima beneath the oceans.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: Period of Transgressional Sea?
when the substratum reaches the molten condition (refer slide # 47), following occur
- The expansion of sima due to melting causes increase in the radius of the globe
- Continental masses or sialic masses are raised relative to the centre of the globe.
- sialic masses begin to sink in molten sima.
- The level of oceanic water rises due to sinking of sialic or continental masses into liquid sima. This mechanism causes extension of oceanic water over the continental margins. This process of expansion of oceanic waters and their encroachment on-continental margins is called transgression of sea and the concerned stage is known as the phase of transgressional sea.
- Transgression of sea results in sedimentation on the submerged continental margins. Thus, this theory of radioactivity accounts for the origin of geosynclines due to submergence of continental margins during transgressional phase of sea.
- Under the oceans, The increase in the radius and the circumference of the globe due to melting of sima produces tension in the oceanic beds which causes cracks and faults. Molten materials or molten basalts come upward through these cracks and faults. These molten basalts are then solidified and thus oceanic- islands are formed. The radioactivity theory, thus, explains the islands of the Pacific and other oceans.
- Continental masses easily float over molten sima, consequently they are more affected by tidal force which causes westward movement of the continents. It is in this way that the radioactivity theory also describes the process of continental drift.
- Continental drift changes the position of the continents and the oceans as the former occupy the positions of the latter. This process allows the escape of heat and thus the transgressional phase comes to an end.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: Period of Regressional Sea?
- The temperature of the substratum decreases because of loss of heat due to continental drift. Thus, the cooling of the substratum results in the resolidification of molten substratum. The cooling of the substratum begins from its upper layer and continues downward and ultimately the whole of the substratum becomes solid on cooling.
- The density of the substratum (sima), which was relatively decreased during its molten stage, again increases to regain its previous value.
- The radius and the circumference of the globe, which were increased due to melting of the substratum, arc again shortened to their previous position, with the result the continents, which were raised relative to the centre of the globe, are again brought to their previous positions.
- Relative increase in the density of the substratum due to resolidification causes contraction of the oceanic bed which results in the withdrawal of oceanic waters from the continental margins. This is called the phase of regressional sea.
- Because of the withdrawal of oceanic water previously submerged continental margins (during the phases of transgressional sea) rise upward and the deposited sediments are exposed above the water level.
It may be remembered that the oceanic beds were subjected to maximum expansion during the period of transgressional phase due to melting of the substratum. Similarly, the oceanic beds are also subjected to maximum contraction during the period of regressional sea due to resolidification of molten substratum.
6. Thus, contracting beds of two oceans exert lateral compression on the sediments deposited on the continental margins (geosynclines), consequently the sediments deposited during the period of transgressional sea are squeezed, buckled and folded and thus mountains are formed.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: mechanism?
Temperature at top of sima layer is 1050o C while its melting point is 1150o C. Joly calculated that the required amount of heat to liquefy the substratum (to increase T by 100o C as well as latent heat of fusion) would be available in 33,000,000 to 56,000,000 years. If such conditions become possible i.e. if the substratum reaches the molten condition, several changes take place in the earth’s structure during, what he called, Period of Transgressional Sea.** It was followed by **Period of Regressional Sea.
Joly has described two parallel processes of mountain building:
(i) The sediments deposited in the shallow seas of the continental margins are squeezed and folded due to lateral compression caused by two contracting oceanic beds,
(ii) Vertical force is produced during the process of resolidification of the substratum. This vertical force raises the whole mountains system formed during the first process.
It is obvious that according to this theory mountains are always formed along the margins of the continents facing oceans.
The intensity of lateral pressure and consequent magnitude of folding depend on the amount of contraction of oceanic beds. It may be argued that large oceans would produce more powerful lateral compression and hence greatest mountain would face largest ocean. eg. Rockies and Andes facing Pacific Ocean
Joly also explains the period of quiescence between two periods of mountain building. The total period of two solid phases of the substratum (solid phase, molten phase and resoldification phase of the substratum) is called a revolution wherein the melting of substratum (sima) takes total time period of 33,000,000 to 56,000,000 years. It may be, thus, inferred that the process of mountain building occurs in cyclic manner wherein the period of mountain building is alternated by the period of quiescence.
Radioactive Theory of Joly: evaluation?
Pros:
- Joly’s views on the earth’s surface history are based on such reasonable premises, and are so simple in their conception, that they have met with a great deal of favour
Criticism
- the force of expansion and contraction of the substratum (sima) due to melting and cooling respectively based on radioactive elements is doubtful and perhaps is not enough to form mountains.
- Jeffreys has demonstrated that sima (substratum) if melted at all cannot resolidify if we accept the capacity of radioactive agencies to liquefy sima.
- Jeffreys did not agree with the 30km thickness of the continental masses as envisaged by Joly. According to Jeffreys the thickness of the continental crust may not be more than 16km. If the thickness of the continental crust is accepted to be 16 km then the whole mechanism of Joly’s theory would come to a grinding halt as required amount of heat of 1150 C would not be possible at the depth of 16km.
- Joly’s concept of cyclic nature of mountain building has been disputed by some critics. The theory envisages uniform periods of quiescence between two periods of mountain building but this concept has also been disputed.
- This theory envisages two facts about mountain building, (i) ‘The greatest mountains must face the greatest oceanic beds’, (ii) Both the margins of the continent must have mountains of the same period and both the margins should be regular. The first is validated to some extent but the second fact is not validated.
- This theory presents erroneous concept about geosynclines. As per this theory geosynclines are always formed due to submergence of continental margins due to transgression of seas. It means that geosynclines should always be located around the continents. Further, Joly’s geosynclines receive sediments but do not undergo the process of subsidence. Without subsidence the enormous thickness of sediments of the present Alpine mountains cannot be explained.
Continental Drift Theory: Mountain Building?
The frontal edges of westward drifting continental blocks of North and South Americas were crumpled and folded against the resistance of the rocks of the sea-floor (sima) and thus the western cordilleras of the two Americas (e.g. Rockies and Andes and other mountain chains associated with them) were formed.
Similarly, the Alpine ranges of Eurasia were folded due to equatorward movement of Eruasia and Africa to gether with Pennisular India (equator was passing thorough Tethys sea at that time).
(can refer f/c Geomorphology)