motor neuron disease Flashcards

1
Q

nm disease

A

peripheral Polyneuropathy
Peripheral
neuropathy

nm junction
Myasthenia
gravis
Lambert Eaton Syndrome

primary muscle disorder
muscular dystrophy
mitochondrial myopathies

mixed U / LMN
MN disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

motor neuron disease

A

Progressive neurodegenerative disease
Insidious onset of painless, progressive weakness
Characterised by progressive loss of motor neurons in the cortex, brain stem and spinal cord, leading to worsening paralysis of voluntary muscles
Unknown aetiology
Genetics: complex, 5-10% familial MND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

epidemiology

A

Commonest neurodegeneration of young and middle aged adults
Incidence: 0.6-2.6 / 100,000
Approximately 200 people with MND in Ireland at any one time
Age of onset 47-63 years in most cases, but can occur at any age
Unknown cause
Fatal disease
Median survival 2.5-5y from diagnosis 40% survive >5y, 10% >10y
Survival depends on distribution of symptoms: bulbar onset median
survival 141 days, limb onset 605 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

early symptoms

A

Variable, depends on where the loss of motor neurons starts

Most common symptoms:
Clumsy hand
Slurred speech / dysarthria
Shoulder weakness
Foot drop / tripping
Difficulty walking (spasticity)
Decreased endurance
Fasciculation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

signs and distribution

A

Upper Motor Neuron Signs
Slurred speech
Altered emotional control Spasticity
Slurred speech Hyperreflexia Reduced dexterity

Lower Motor Neuron Signs
Weakness Muscle atrophy Fasciculations Cramping Areflexia

bulbar signs
Dysphagia Slurred speech Loss of speech Weak cough SOB
Impaired saliva management

Aspiration
“Spinal” Signs Limb weakness Spasticity Clumsy hand Foot drop

Other symptoms
Fatigue Weight loss Pain
Fronto-temporal dementia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of MND

A

amyotropic
66%
UMN + anterior horn cells

progressive muscular atrophy
7.5%
LMN
involvement only

progressive bulbar palsy
Bulbar +pseudobulbar involvement

primary lateral sclerosis
UMN signs only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

diagnosis

A

No single test or biomarker
Characteristic clinical findings, supported by
investigations, with exclusion of differentials
EMG: widespread denervation / reinvervation, conduction block, fibrillation
NCS: Normal sensory responses, no conduction
block
MRI: to exclude other disorders (usually normal)
Difficult diagnostic process, typical delay of 9-15 months
Common to have “misdiagnoses” along the way,
e.g. cervical / lumbar radiculopathy

full blood count
ESR CRP
creative kinase is elevated

Vit B12 and folate
muscle biopsy
lumbar puncutre
HIV and lyme serology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

El escorial criteria for diagnosis

A

Definite ALS
Presence of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron signs in the bulbar region and at two of the other spinal regions

Probable ALS
Presence of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron signs in at least two regions with upper motor neuron signs rostral to lower motor neuron signs

Probably ALS, laboratory results supported
Presence of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron signs in one region with evidence by EMG of lower motor neuron involvement in another region

Possible ALS
Presence of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron signs in one region or upper motor neuron signs in two or three regions, such as monomelic ALS, progressive bulbar palsy and primary lateral sclerosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

prognostic factors

A

site of onset: better - limbs
worse prog bulbar/ resp

diagnostic delay better- longer
worse - shorter

family history C9orf72 gene

rate of progression
faster - better
slower - worse

psychological factors - worse - distress

fronto-temporal dementia - no FTD
worse + FTD

weight low BMI / smoking = worse prognosis

care model - access to specialist MDT - better
worse - non-specialist care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

pharm

A
Riluzole
Increases survival by  (median) 4.2 months
Mechanism not fully
understood:  Antiglutaminergic  modulation?
Mitochondrial function?  Fat metabolism?
Calcium or sodium channel
function?
Prescribed early in  Beaumont
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

speech difficulties

A

Dysarthria – Anarthria
Due to flaccid or spastic muscles of speech
Decreased respiratory function

Speech strategies
Alphabet board
“Lite writer”
Writing
Texting
Eye Gaze / Eye Tech software
Voice banking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

swallowing difficulties

A

45% of Irish patients have difficulty swallowing
81% have difficulty at time of death
SLT & Dietitian assessment – videofluroscopy
Swallowing techniques
Thickened fluids / modified diet

RIG / PEG – if appropriate – complex decision: rationale:
Declining weight (>10% BW)
Increased time spent at meals
Increasing dysphagia
Quality of life
Respiratory function FVC>50%, SNIP >40cm H2O
Tolerates NIV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

resp dysfunction

A

Respiratory failure most frequent cause of death
People with MND most often have healthy lungs!
Respiratory problems occur due to loss of bulbar, cervical and
thoracic motor neurons
Inspiratory muscles preferentially affected → Hypoventilation → Impaired gas exchange
Weak cough results from weakness in inspiratory muscles, bulbar function and expiratory muscles
Significant impact on Quality of Life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

secondary problems

A
Atelectasis
Secretion retention
Fatigue due to coughing ineffectively
Pneumonia
Disuse atrophy
Shortening of musculature
Chest wall stiffness
Reduced lung compliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

medical mgmt for resp problems

A

Tracheostomy
Common in some countries
Prolongs survival but can result in poor QOL
Generally not in Ireland

  1. NIV in form of NIPPV
    Decision based on overnight pulse oxymetry, early morning ABGs, SNIP and presenting symptoms
    Reduces work of breathing
    Improve gas exchange, exercise tolerance, sleep quality
    Prolongs survival
  2. Use of meds to decrease secretion production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cognitive problems

A

Overlap between MND and frontotemporal dementia

40% patients with MND show impaired executive dysfunction

Impacts on management: memory, understanding, engagement

Associated with a faster rate of functional decline

Not usually a presenting feature

17
Q

role of physio

A

mobility
resp care
exercise
pain management

18
Q

neurological rehab

A
restore 
active movement 
strength 
motor control 
function 
neuroplasticity 
motor learning 
adapt 
comp strategies 
aids 
strengthen 
intact muscles 
motor learning 

maintain - physcial activity
ROM
mobility
QOL

prevent 
contracture 
pain 
pressure 
immobility 
secondary complication
19
Q

mobility

A

Consider from an Activity Limitation viewpoint
Home environment
Priority = falls risk assessment
Foot drop → “foot up” or Dictus splint, AFO
Gait aids: depends on upper limb function (hands and shoulders)
Wheelchair provision
Fatigue management
Carer perspective

20
Q

resp management

A

Limit pneumonias / aspirations - positioning
Reduce secretions and secretion retention
Positioning to a maximum mechanical advantage, ease work of
breathing
Prevention of atelectasis
Manually assisted coughing
Airway clearance techniques

21
Q

assessing cough

A

Symptoms
Chest infections
Listen
Peak Cough Flow (PCF)

PCF ≤ 160 l/min → ineffective cough

PCF ≤ 270 l/min → Associated with pulmonary complications

Acute infection → Reduction in respiratory muscle force leading to a further decrease in PCF

22
Q

managing weak cough

A

Distressing for patient, family, carers and physio

What are the options?
Manually assisted cough
Manually assisted cough using NIV to boost airflow
Breath Stacking
Oral / Yanker suction
Cough Assist (Mechanical Insufflation: Exsufflation)

23
Q

manual breath stacking

A
Maximises volume of air inhaled
Manually stacking breaths
Maximum Insufflation Capacity (MIC)
achieved
Recruits collapsed lung segments
Micro atelectasis reversed
24
Q

exercise in MND / ALS

A

Evidence for much of physiotherapy management is at the level of clinical opinion (Morris et al, 2006)
Cochrane Review – more research required – insufficient evidence (Dalbello Haas et al, 2008)
Effects of exercise are not well understood
Competing risks of overuse damage to already overworked and fatigable muscles versus disuse atrophy

Lots of evidence to date regarding benefits of exercise in animal models: Moderate intensity endurance training slowed disease progression in mice
High intensity endurance exercise training had detrimental effects Swimming shown in one study to be of greater benefit than other forms of exercise

Prevent complications and pain caused by deconditioning and
immobility
Reduce co-morbidities and maximise function
Patient choice
Options: low to moderate intensity endurance exercise, strengthening / resisted exercise, flexibility exercise

25
Q

resistance exercise

A

Better function and QOL and trend towards less decline in MVIC in patients participating in 3x weekly for 6 months resisted exercise protocol: 3 sets of 5 reps at 100% 6-RM (set 1), 75% 6-RM (set 2), 50% 6-RM (set 3)
No adverse events
High drop out rate Resistance exercise for MND is:
Recommended for early stage disease, and ideally slowly progressive
disease, with a goal focusing on function.
Suitable for >grade 3 strength only: there needs to be a sufficient number of motor units still functioning in order to benefit.
Best using a low intensity and resistance.

26
Q

CV exercise

A

No RCT level evidence
Rationale: maximise work capacity and endurance, prevent loss of aerobic capacity resulting from weakness and inactivity
Heart rate and ventilatory responses similar to normal but metabolism of O2 and lipids altered → adequate oxygenation and carbohydrate loads
Aim for 11-13 (“fairly light” to “somewhat
hard”) on 6-20 point Borg RPE scale.

27
Q

stretching / flexibility / PROM

A

Weakness → imbalance between agonist and antagonist
Predisposing to contractures, poor posture, increased mobility problems and deformities

Rationale:
Maintain muscle and soft tissue extensibility and joint mobility, prevent contractures
PROM to joints that patients cannot move themselves
Stretching and ROM for spasticity management
Education of carers and family members on PROM and stretches for
daily input
Standing equipment should be considered
Resistance free cycling for spasticity management (Motomed)

28
Q

pain

A

Two main sources of pain: MSK (muscle imbalance) and spasticity (cramping) -stretch
Treat it as you would any other MSK pain

joint pain - causes Immobility resulting
from weakness,
abnormal postures, joint
instability, contractures,
prolonged stretch
treatment 
Stretching
Positioning
Support slings
Heat
Joint mobilisations
TENS
Joint injection

shoulder pain - instability
Rx: support slings

education

29
Q

Outcome measures

A

strength
oxford
10 RM
dynamometry

mobility
activity limitation
gait speed

ADL and function
ALS functional rating scale

QOL participation
EQ5D
SF36

fatigue
impairment
fatigue severity scale

30
Q

palliative care

A

improve QOL
MDT discuss
persons wishes for end of life care