Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Econ paper 1 > Monopoly Regulation and Competition policy > Flashcards

Monopoly Regulation and Competition policy Flashcards

1
Q

What is the role of monopoly regulation

A

To promote competition, make markets work better and to improve the efficiency and competitiveness, as well as protecting consumers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When does the government intervene?

A

There is a rationale for competition authorities to intervene in an industry when public interest is harmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Main regulating body

A

CMA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UK Energy price cap

A

As of April 2024
This will reduce the energy price cap from £1,928 to £1,690 per year, a reduction of around 12%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 types of monopoly regulation

A

Price regulation
Windfall taxes on monopoly profits
Merger policy
Privatisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name the 4 types of price regulation

A

Price cap
RPI
RPI-X
RPI+K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are windfall taxes

A

Higher tax on profits made by a firm that has benefitted from something they went responsible for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aim of windfall taxes

A

to incentivise firms to reduce prices and lower their overall profit they make and to promote efficiency saving for firms to reduce their costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4 negatives of windfall tax

A
  1. Increases AC and MC resulting in even higher prices and lower quantities than before
  2. Can promote tax evasion and tax avoidance
  3. Reduce significant dynamic efficiency gains so consumers lose out on innovative and lower prices
  4. Unintended consequences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example of windfall tax imposed in the UK

A

Energy Profits Levy
Set in 2022, in place till 2029

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a real world example of a regulator and their role (airline industry)

A

CAA (Civil Aviation Authority)
Impose a price cap on landing charges at Heathrow, given the airports dominant control of the airport market, can abuse its monopoly power by charging excessive landing charges which would then increase passenger fares, harming travellers which goes against public interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the market share of Heathrow Airport between the years 2015 and 2021

A

30.1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 negatives of price regulation

A
  1. Government setting price regulation to high or too low, do not have perfect information
  2. Extremely costly - opportunity cost
  3. Regulatory capture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an example of regulatory capture

A

Boeing accepting fault to 2 fatal crashes the 737 Max in 2019, an agreement with the US government made them immune from legal prosecution by paying $2.5Bn in fines and compensation without the knowledge and acceptance of the victims families.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a merger policy?

A

Grounds on which the CMA will investigate proposed mergers if they would have a combined market share of over 25% and if the mergers have a combined annual turnover of over £70m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Example of when merger policy was used

A

2018 proposed merger between Asda and Sainsbury’s
Combined market share of 30%
Blocked by CMA from taking place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Diagram of price cap regulation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a price cap

A

A maximum price ceiling that monopolists can charge consumers. Capped at allocative efficiency. Prevents monopolies charging excessive prices and exploiting consumers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain RPI price regulation

A

Considered a relatively fair form of price regulation that can be used to restrict price increases by using the RPI inflation rates as a cap. Firms can only increase their prices as much as RPI inflation rate allowing firms to cover costs and make small profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explain RPI-X

A

Harsh price regulation on firms that have abused their monopoly power. Firms can increase they prices by RPI inflation rate but then firms can increase their prices by an additional -X% which results in the firm only being able to charge prices below RPI inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Aim of RPI-X

A

to encourage firms to make efficiency gains in the short run to push their costs back downing order to remain profitable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explain RPI+K

A

Allows firms to increase their prices by RPI inflation rate and then by an additional K%. Enables the firm to charge prices above the inflation rate.

23
Q

When might RPI+K be used?

A

When firms have infrastructural problems affecting their efficiency. Can make extra profit to reinvest in better infrastructure and technology to improve efficiency and quality of service that would otherwise not be achieved by simple RPI price regulation and would damage public interest

24
Q

3 negatives of price regulation

A
  1. Assumed governments have perfect info, not the case so could set regulation too high or too low
  2. Regulation is costly in maintaining existence of regulatory bodies → opportunity cost
  3. Risk of regulatory capture
25
Q

Consequence of X being set too low or K being set too high…

A

Results in prices still being charged in excess above marginal cost, burdening consumers and reducing their CS

26
Q

What is the end outcome of regulatory capture in price regulation

A

Lower values of X being set
Higher values of K being set
Slight improvements in allocation but not to the full extent to eliminate inefficiency of monopoly firms
Misallocation of resources persists

27
Q

What are the two ways in which competition can be increased?

A

Privatisation and deregulation

28
Q

Define privatisation

A

the transfer of state owned assets into private ownership

29
Q

Define deregualtion

A

Process of removing regulation to lower the barriers to entry and exit, increasing contestability and actual competition

30
Q

What are 3 forms in which privatisation can come in?

A
  1. Sale of state owned firms or industries to private sector corporations or individuals
  2. Government can contract out services to the private sector where the gov still control and monitor the market output but the jobs themselves are carried out by private sector firms
  3. A Public Private Partnership (PPP) which can occur when the government works alongside private sector firms to complete a project
31
Q

What is an example of a common public private partnership

A

Private Financial Initiative (PFI)
Where private firms pay for all construction costs on a project and then the government pays them back overtime in interest payments

32
Q

Why are PPIs powerful policies to use?

A

Because it allows the government to pursue key infrastructure projects even if finance isn’t available at the current time, often useful when in a deep budget deficit

33
Q

Diagram of privatisation outcomes

A

P&D encourage competition, whilst P also creates a profit motive and generates rev for the gov. They promote outcomes like those found in competitive markets where AE can be achieved with prices close to or equal to marginal cost. Resources allocated according to consumer demand with consume getting what they want at the quantity they desire.

34
Q

Why might privatisation and deregulation not promote competitive outcomes

A

If potential suppliers don’t actually join the market after deregulation
Private firms could form a monopoly or oligopoly
Private firms abuse their market power
Private firms have profit incentive so may actually charge high prices and restrict output, consumer surplus lost

35
Q

But could non-competitive outcomes actually be beneficial?

A

Yes
Although it may seem that firms abuse their market power and exploit consumers
They may use these higher profits to reinvest into the company in the long run, bringing innovative products through R&D
Better tech and capital, so in the long run may actually lower costs of production and lead to future price reductions for consumers

36
Q

Strength of Privatisation and Deregulation (efficiency)

A

Lead to productive efficiency, private firms have an incentive to reduce costs as much as possible. All possible economic software scale are exploited. Lower average costs is translated as lower prices for consumers. Can also benefit the firm if their costs lead to lower prices than rival firms, increasing market share

37
Q

Does privatising firms actually lead to dynamic efficiency?

A

May not always
If incumbent firms are faced with lots of contestability and actual intense competition in the market, this would force the to drive down their prices to stay competitive which reduces the firms ability to make supernormal profit, thus restricting reinvestment and overtime consumers lose out on innovative tech reducing their choice and prevents any future price falls.

38
Q

Limitation of Private Financial Initiatives

A

Can increase government debt substantially more overtime.
Governments are still responsible for paying for maintenance costs and with payments with additional interest also being paid back to the private firm. As a result this could lead to unintended consequences of future generations having too bear the burden of tax increases or perhaps government cutting spending on key public services just to service the debt.

39
Q

Define Nationalisation

A

The process of taking a private owned industry into public ownership

40
Q

What are the intentions of nationalisation

A

Promoting efficient outcomes and results in the industry or firm being completely in the hands of the government.
Aims at running an industry in the best interest of society

41
Q

What is one argument for nationalisation

A

Likely to bring allocative efficient outcomes into the industry. Government focussing on the full social costs and benefits of actions and focussing on service provision.
Public sector focus on meeting needs and wants of the public to maximise social welfare as well as taking into account any externalities unlike private firms
Consequently could be lower prices and no over or under production. Resources allocated at the socially optimum level of output. Fixing any previous market failures.

42
Q

Why might nationalisation not lead to lower prices?

A

Public sector firms lack the incentive to minimise costs.
Lack competitive pressure and lack profit motives
Unlikely to operate at the minimum point on their AC curve and so unlikely to reach their MES
Voluntarily forgo economies of scale
Not productively efficient
Leads to higher prices charged to consumers

43
Q

Second negative of nationalisation

A

Public sector provision is expensive and relies on taxpayer funding.
Large opportunity cost if there is no surplus tax revenue
Money could’ve been spent on other important services like education or healthcare

44
Q

Are nationalisation expenses that bad?

A

despite being expensive it can be argued that the delivery of key public services provides more benefit than the cost to provide them in the market. These services would’ve otherwise been underproduced or under-provided by private sector firms.
Correct missing markets which would otherwise lead to complete market failure if left to private firms to provide public goods.

45
Q

What is the final con of nationalisation

A

Lack of supernormal profit made in the public sector
because objective is to satisfy public interest with low prices and high output.
No dynamic efficiency
Implying less innovation, or improvements in infrastructure and capital and service
Keeps costs high and prices high

46
Q

How could lack of dynamic efficiency be solved in nationalised firms

A

Government pursuing Public Private partnerships.
Maximise social welfare
Resources allocated at the socially optimum levels with low prices due to the government monitoring and controlling the business.
But dynamic efficiency is likely to be achieved because of the efficiency and profit motivated drives of private firms.

47
Q

What are Social tariffs

A

A system of reduced prices or subsidies for certain goods and services that are designed to make them more affordable for low income and disadvantaged groups

48
Q

When are social tariffs often used?

A

Often used in utility industries like broadband, electricity and water

E.g Ofcom set social tariffs to offer cheaper broadband and phone packages to people claiming universal credit and other benefits.

49
Q

When was the water industry privatised

A

1989 for Welsh and English companies - 16 monopoly water companies

50
Q

RWA: fine given to company following raw sewage discharge

A

In 2022 Southern Water company were fined £330,000 for stream pollution that killed nearly 2000 fish because of mismanagement and faulty sewage pumping systems.

51
Q

RWA: total times of sewage discharge

A

In the year 2022 alone, united utilities discharged raw sewage into English waterways 69000 times. Was the highest discharger of raw sewage, compared to thames valley who had discharged 8000.

52
Q

What is the UK’s water industry responsible for?

A

Collecting, treating ad delivering billions of tonnes of water to households and businesses.

53
Q

Who are Thames Valley and how much debt are they in?

A

Thames is the UK’s largest water company, with 16 million customers in London and the Thames Valley region. However, it currently has debts of about £15.4bn and it has also come under fierce criticism for water leaks and sewage spillages

54
Q

Negtaive externalities of production RWA in China

A

The mining and processing of Earth Elements in northern China has caused years of toxic leaking into surrounding water sources.
Dumping of radioactive and toxic wastes into vast tailing ponds, seeping into the ground below and exposed to the air.
Led to water for nearby villagers being poisoned and even 35-40% of villagers got cancer

Econ paper 1 (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions