modules11-15 Flashcards
Article 72 of the Indian Constitution,
the President has the power to pardon, remit, suspend or commute any sentence. the President has the power to pardons, reprieves, respites or remission of punishment or to suspend remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence
Article 161 of the Constitution of India
, these powers are conferred on the Governor of the States. The Governor can pardon, reprieve, respite a punishment or suspend, remit or commute the sentence, which is given on the basis of the laws prevalent in the State, to which the executive power of the State extends. The difference between the pardoning power of the President and that of the Governor is that the Governor does not enjoy the power to grant pardon to a death sentence.
Epuru Sudhakar vs the State of Andhra Pradesh
a small leeway is provided for judicial review of the mercy granting power of the President and the Governor to rule out any sort of arbitrariness.
Section 433A of the CrPC
puts a restriction on the power of the President and the Governor that they can’t commutate the death sentence to less than 14 years of life imprisonment
joinder of charges
s218 onwards
offences should have seperate charge and tried seperately but accused may apply for joinder of charges.
Charges may be joined if: s220the acts are committed within the same transaction or
2. s 219 if the same offence is commited 3 or less times within past 12 months the trial may be clubbed together
if it is doubtful what offences have been commited- all charges may be mentioned in charge sheet
if charged of an offence and later turns out they did not commit that offence instead a minor offence- that offence he may be convicted of even though he was not charged w it. (like if A was accused of grevious hurt with a weapon but he actually just did grevious hurt)
sham sahab multani v karnataka
if accused is charged with one offece and acquitted of the same he cannot be convicted of another charge. accused must be informed of all the charges.
wat persons may be charged jointly - s223
- same offence- same transaction,
- accused of abetment or atempt to commit
- different offences during same transaction
- offences that include theft, criminal misappropriation, extortion, property possession concealment may be charged 2gether
- abetment, attempting and counterfeigting currency may be charged 2gether
withdrawal of remaining charges s224
if multiple charges made against person and they are convicted of one/ few of them, the prosecuter may withdraw the remaining charges w consent of the court
what is the flow of sessions trial
- trial
- opening case prosecution
- discharge after consideration or hearing accused
BUT if court thinks trial is necessary - framing of charge and if required transfer to CJM
- plea of guilt. if pleaded guilty= conviction
- date for prosecution evidence if not guilty
- evidence is examined and cross examined
- if no evidence = aquit
- entering upon defence- statements/ records etc
- Arguments
- Judgement
trial for warrant cases
can either be thru police report or private complaint
238-249
absence of the complainant in a non cognizable case= acquittal
if false accusation - notice of compensation will b given to complainant
trial of summons
framing of charges is not necessary - and only the substances of accusation to be made known to accused.
summon cases may be converted to warrant cases if punishment more than 6month s
SUMMARY TRIALS
summary trials may be conducted:
cjm, mm, M1st- punishment below 2 yrs like theft, housebreaking, concealing recieveing stolen property below value of 200 rs
summary trials may be conducted w confirmation of HC.
The punishment given cannot be more than 3 month s
record of summary trial
Record in Summary Trials:
1. Serial Number
2. Date of commission of offence
3. Date of report of complaint
4. Name of the complaint if any Name,
5. parentage and residence of the accused
6. The value of property in case of 379,380,381 =<200 (Theft) / 411,414 =>200 (receiving / concealment / stolen property)
7. Plea of accused and his examination
8. Findings
9. The sentence or the final order / date of termination of proceedings
plea bargaining
sec265a-l
applicable only for punishment less than 7 yrs
any offences against children below 14, women or effecting the socioeconomic condition of nation = NO plea bargaining
voluntary plea to reduce punishment- the accused should not have any previous conviction of the same.
if plea bargaining is successful- court has to dispose case w punishment= wether imprisonment or compensation victim. minimum= HALF of th punishment , if offender isnt under Probation of offendors act 1/4th of offence punishment may be served
This judgement will be FINAL= NO APPEAL
265 I= period of detention to be minused (set off) from the sentance of imprisonment
plea bargaining
sec265a-l
applicable only for punishment less than 7 yrs
any offences against children below 14, women or effecting the socioeconomic condition of nation = NO plea bargaining
voluntary plea to reduce punishment- the accused should not have any previous conviction of the same.
if plea bargaining is successful- court has to dispose case w punishment= wether imprisonment or compensation victim. minimum= HALF of th punishment , if offender isnt under Probation of offendors act 1/4th of offence punishment may be served
This judgement will be FINAL= NO APPEAL
265 I= period of detention to be minused (set off) from the sentance of imprisonment
NOT applicable for juveniles justice care act