modules 5-10 Flashcards

1
Q

2 ways for person to initiate criminal proceedings

A

sec 154- FIR
sec 190 - complain to magistrate and hope for cognizance.,
Mag 1st class can do suo moto, 2nd class can if empowerd by CJM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

complaint proceedings

s. 2(D)

A

allegation= charge
- oral/written
- goes to JM-1
- mag can order investigation9156(3) by taking cogni. under 190
- or complainant gets examined under s.200

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sec200-202

A

examination of complainant and any wittnesses that come forward (not summoned)
mag orders examinartion of witness= mag has “taken cognizance”
s200- mag may order investigation by PO

Mag need not examine informant if- they are public servant and made the complaint in writing
and if mag takes over the case of another magistrate- no need to reexamine the witness etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

dismissal of complaint

q

A

203- if after investig/inquiry= no grounds for proceeding then - dismiss complaint
remedy for dimissal= HC= 401 and court of sessions under 399

if new facts are found then 2nd complaint is allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

comittal proceedings

A

sec209+323
Section 209 deals with the commitment of the case to the Court of Session. According to this section if a Magistrate feels that if the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session after instituting a case, then-
The Magistrate can commit the case to the Court of Session;
The accused can be remanded in custody until the proceedings are subject to the other provisions relating to bail;
The Magistrate can send evidence and other relevant evidence to the concerned court to carry out the proceedings;
The Magistrate can also notify the Public Prosecutor of the commitment of the case to the Court of Session.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cognizance of offences by Courts of Session

A

S. 193:- only after comittal - not og jurisdiction
S. 197: prosecution of judges & public servant-
S.199: prosecution for defamation-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

principles of charge framing

A

S.211: contents of charge (section etc)
S. 212: Particulars as to time, place & person-
S. 213: When manner of committing offence must be stated

S. 216: Alteration of charge
Eg. If NEW charge is entirely different- New trial
If new charge is NOT different- NO NEW trial (like s. 325,324 IPC same category offence)
Previous sanction is taken if public authority does something in official capacity.
Upon alteration of charge- witnesses can be re-examined.
S. 217: Recall of witnesses when charge altered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sec218

A

S.218: Separate charge for distinct offences.
Eg. A charged with 3offences.
Theft-trial
Murder-trial
Forgery-trial
There can be separate trial for all three offences or a joint trial for all three offences.
If in same transaction A has committed all three offences then court will join the charges. It’s a JOINDER OF CHARGES.

. 219: Three offences of same kind within a year may be charged together.

S.223: What persons may be charged jointly
There are few criteria for joinder of accused- to be studies from bare act s.223)

Joinder of accused

Eg. Abatement
Attempt
In course of same transaction, different offences committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

withdrawal of charge

A

S**.224: Withdrawal of remaining charges on conviction on one of several charges. **

Object- to save judicial time.
Stage of withdrawal- only after conviction in one of the charges.
Result of withdraw- acquittal
Limitation- acquittal is subject to HC order of setting aside conviction.
Court can stay charges.
Even complainant u/s 200 can withdraw.
When there are 2 charges or more- only when more than one charge is there then withdrawal can be made.
Withdrawal can be against the same person only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mohan Singh v. state of Bihar

A

if evidence is there and case is cognizable then magistrate cannot just drop the charges and not investigate- must commit case to court of sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

sec228

A

Framing of Charge
when the trial of a case begins, the judge is required to hear the prosecution and examine any witnesses produced by the prosecution. After this, the judge may, if he or she thinks that there is sufficient ground for proceeding with the case, frame a charge against the accused person.- charge should be in writing.
if accused pleads guilty when the trial of a case begins, the judge is required to hear the prosecution and examine any witnesses produced by the prosecution. After this, the judge may, if he or she thinks that there is sufficient ground for proceeding with the case, frame a charge against the accused person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bhawna Bai v. Ghanshyam

A

The Apex Court itself has said, that “at the stage of framing of charge, the court is required to evaluate the material and documents on record” to see if a prima facie case is made out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

jurisdiction

A

Section 177: the court in whose jurisdiction the offence takes place shall have the power o try the matter.
S. 185 Power to order cases to be tried in different sessions divisions
S. 186 High Court to decide, in cases of doubt, district where inquiry or trial shall take place
S. 187 Power to issue summons or warrant for offence committed beyond local jurisdiction
S. 188 Offence committed outside India When an offence is committed outside India
any ship aircraft registered in India, or high seas by citizen of India or non-citizen.
Sec 189 Receipt of evidence relating to offence committed outside India.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sec178 jurisdiction

A

Section 178: Place of inquiry or trial -a) Uncertain Aera:-When it is uncertain in which of the several local areas an offence is commit.b) Doubtful Area: -where an offence is committed in one local area and partly in another, it may be inquired into or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of such local areas.c) Continue offence: -where an offence is continuing one, and continues to be committed in more local areas than one, it may be inquired into or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any such local areas.d) Different local areas: -where it consists of serial acts done in different local areas it may be inquired into or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of such local areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

types of trial

A
  1. sessions trial s225-237
  2. warrant trial s238-250
  3. summons case s251-259
  4. summary trial s260-265
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nathi Lal & ors. vs. State of U.P. & anr.

A

if case and counter case are triable in diff courts- the order is usually that the same judge must pronounce the judgement for both in quick succession so they must both be committed to one court

17
Q

withdrawal of prosecution

A

s321
To be done before judgement.
By Public prosecutor or Asst. Public prosecutor.
With the consent of the court
Note: before charge framing- discharge
After charge framing- acquittal
Summon case- acquittal (as no charge is framed)

18
Q

Abdul karim v State of Karnataka

A

When the state govt. wanted to withdraw prosecution against some notorious criminals, the supreme court deprecated the decision of the state govt. & upheld the right of the general public to prevent withdrawal of prosecution being permitted by the court with the support of the state govt.
Public Prosecutor seeking withdrawal so as to maintain peace among people living in border area and of a village and to prevent unpleasant situation in border area – Application for withdrawal however not stating as to why breach of peace was apprehended by Public Prosecutor. Court granting consent could not therefore, have satisfied itself that Public Prosecutor had applied his mind to relevant material and exercised juris dictum in good faith. Consent granted is bad in law.
Grant of permission – On ground that application for withdraw has been filed by Public Prosecutor on basis of Government order – Does not meet requirements of S. 321 – Permission granted is bad in law.
Satisfaction of Public Prosecutor – Cannot be based on information which he could not verify – Permission to withdraw also held to have been obtained by misleading Court.
Supreme court said its a bad precedent to withdraw charges of TADA.

19
Q

compounding an offence

A

s. 320
offences which can be compromised are compoundable.
Purpose:
Offence is less grave
Societal wrong is not much than individual wrong.
To reduce burden of court & allow compensation to victim.
Compounding only within the list of S. 320