Module 6.4-6.7 Flashcards
Dismissal without caus applies to
non labour nonunionized employees
IF THE EMPLOYEE IS FIRED FOR JUST CAUSE………….
THEN NOT ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF TERMINATION!!!
according to common law an employer may terminate an employment contract for just cause wihtout giing notice!!!!!!
dismisaal without cause requrie what?
advance notice
an indefintie contract of employment may be terminated by an employer for any reason as long as reasonable notice is given!!!
employer can either a) reqirue employee to continue working for the notice period OR b) give employee pay in lieu of wokring notice
What is the appropriate perido of notice for employee
a) terms of employment contract
b) employments tandards code
c) common law!
common law period of reaosnable notice is typically much longer than stat minimum!
hwo do we deermine if reasonable notice was given in dismissal without caus case?
- review employment contract to see any express ters
b) ESC minimum period of termination notice
c) common law to identify potential period of reasonable notice of termination
section 4 of ESC says you CANNOT PURPORT THE MINIMUM NOTICE AS PER THE STATUTORY DETAILS
iF THERE is no contract or the contract is silent on notice period
then the employer needs to consider BOTh statuatory minimum and reasonable common law period
termination of employment is dealt with in divison 8 of employment standards code
notice of termination has to be PROVIDED IN WRITING & EARNINGS CANNOT CHANGE DURING THE TIME WHEN NOTICE IS GIVEN AND THE TERMINATION HAPPENS
cant alter matierla terms of contract
secton 55.2 when are employers not required to give advance notice
- just cause
- employed <90 days
- fixed term cotnract <12 mos
- strike
- contract of employ is frustrated
- season employees
AND LOOK AT CODE FOR MORE EXCPETIONS
in absence of contractual language to the contrary provding employee with min standards code notice will not satisfy employers common law obligaiton in most instances
incumbent on empoyer to find what constitues reasonable notic ein common law
How is reasonable notice at common law determined?
BARDALL FACTORS
CASE BY CASE BASIS: REGARD CHARACTER OF EMPLOYMENT, LENGTH OF SERVICE, AGE OF EMPLYMENT, AVAILABILTIY OF SIMILAR EMPLOYMENTE ETC.
–BARDALL FACTORS–
1. Characterisitcs of employment: character, length of service, salary, history w employer, seniority
2. Emplyee characterissicts: age of employee, experience and skill set, health
3. outside factors: job market and avialability of reasonable alt employment
NO BARDALL FACTOR IS DETERMINATIVE!! NO RULES OF THUMB!!
one month per year rul of thumb is EXPRESSLY REJECTED BY CANADIAN COURTS
REVIEW THE MANY FACTORS TO SEE WHAT CONSTITURES REASONABLE COMMON LAW PERIOD OF NOTICE
12:38 https://d2l.ucalgary.ca/d2l/le/content/619780/viewContent/6544800/View
Bardall factor: nature of position
Employees in higher level roles, OR HIGHLY SKILLED are entitles to longer periods of advance notice!
REMEMBER ONE FACTOR IS NOT DETERMINITIVE!
Bardall factor: length of service
Often seen as dominating factor but courts establish that this is not the most important or the only factor
longer the service longer the period of notice
but one factor IS NOT DETERMINITIVE
NO ABSOLUTE UPPER LIMIT OR CAP ON REASONABLE NOTICE BUT SOFT CAP IS 24 MOS
Bardall factor: age of employee
older employees, those over 50 are entiteld to longer period of notice!!! this factors importance are going down thouggh
still a material factor
NOT DETERMINTIVE!
Bardall factor: availability of similar employment
where an employee is discharged from aunique job based on employees straining and qualification COURTS REOCGNIZE THEY MAY HAVE AHARD TIME FINDING EMPLYOMENT SO THEY NEED LONGER PERIOD
very fact specific analysis
NOT DETERMINITIVE
BARDALL FACTOR: relocated or recrutied employees
any employees that relocate at the request of aneemploye rneed a logner period of reasonable notice!!!! not withistanding shorter periods of service
not determinitive
termination package
when dismissing an employee without cause, the employer must first consider:
- is it desirable to have the employee work till the end of the period [“working notice”]
- OR is it prefereable to have the emploeye leave immediately [“lump sum + + reasonable notice obligation”]/[“Regualrly pay the employees salarya dn benefits during period of notice while not requiring them to attend and work”]
“lump sum + + reasonable notice obligation”] downside
if you get a job in the noticce period, employer has overpaid
[“Regualrly pay the employees salarya dn benefits during period of notice while not requiring them to attend and work”] nuance
employer can expressly state that if the employee finds employment during notice period these salary continuation payments will end