Module 6-10 Flashcards
What is ADR or Alternative dispute resolution
ADR includes settlement offers, mediation, arbitration, and judicial dispute
Fact: most legal disputes are resolved without going to trial
What are some advantages of ADR instead of suing in court
Save money Save time Confidentiality/ avoid publicity May preserve relationship Flexible Do we want to establish or avoid creating precedent ?
What are the 4 different types of ADR?
Settlement offers/ negotiation - very common, offers can be made by either side at any time before or even during an on going lawsuit even during trial.
Mediation- the parties hire a non biased third party to help them reach a deal, mediators do not make decisions instead they help the parties reach agreement, parties pay for the mediatior and sometimes free mediation services ade available at the court house, mediation can be made mandatory by agreement in a contract
Arbitration - a non judge makes a legally binding decision, this may be mandatory or voluntary: parties can agree on contract to resolve disputes by arbitration, mandated by some legislation, very common in international business disputes
Judicial dispute resolution- a procedure offered by the Alberta court of Queens bench. Formally called a mini trial, parties meet together with an actual judge who provides a non binding decision, the parties often settle on the basis of the judges recommendation, it takes place at the court house
Special advantages of JDR?
Free other then your own legal fees, the parties get to hear it from a judge, is without prejudice and all records are expunged from the court house
Advantages of settling over going to trial ?
Offers can be made without prejudice which means your offer cannot be used against you later if you have to go to court
Can be inform ( a meeting or offer letter ) or formal ( using the rules of the court
Formal offers: added incentive because may result in a cost penalty for not accepting a reasonable offer
Civil case
Private lawsuits initiated by people or business at their own expense
Example: negligence lawsuit or breach of contract lawsuit
Criminal case
Part of public law system, case initiated by the crown ( government )
Example breach of traffic laws or criminal code
How much evidence do you need to win ?
Civil vs criminal
Civil: beyond the balance of probabilities
Criminal: beyond a reasonable doubt
Is it possible to be sued In a civil lawsuit and to also be prosecuted by the crown in a criminal case ?
It is possible to be sued in a civil lawsuit and to also be prosecuted by the crown in a criminal case example OJ Simpson case but you can only sue once in both a civil and criminal case
Define res judicata
The civil case was decided already and the plaintiff cannot sue again
Define double jeopardy
The criminal case was decided already and the crown cannot prosecute again
List the levels of the court system in Canada in order from the top.
Supreme Court if Canada Federal court system Alberta court of appeals Court of Queen's bench Provincial court of Alberta Boards and tribunals
For most lawsuits your right to sue expires on the sooner of:
A. Two years from when you knew or ought to have known of the claim against the defendant
OR
B 10 years after the legal wrong took place
Note: agreements to shorten limitation periods are void
Other limitation rules include
Limitation periods are suspended if the legal wrong was deliberately concealed by the wrongdoer (ex fraud) and only runs from when discovered
Limitation periods are suspended while you are a minor or mentally incompetent
No limitation period for sexual abuse/ assault disabled person
Special rules for trespassers injury lawsuits
Special rules for claims by aboriginal peoples of breach of fiduciary duty by crown
If you loose a lawsuit what are the two costs the court will order you to pay?
- Party and party’s cost - the loser pays a set amount for each step in the lawsuit ( usually less than the real costs about 50-65% ) this is born award in most lawsuits
- Solicitor and client costs - the loser has to pay the actual legal costs of the winner. The court will order these costs if the loser conduct was dishonourable such as:
Frivolous lawsuit
Improper conduct during the lawsuit
Unproven allegation of fraud