Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Ethics & Professional Issues > Module 4 - Ethical Principles > Flashcards

Module 4 - Ethical Principles Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three classical ethical theories?

A
  • Utilitarianism
  • Deontology
  • Virtue Ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Utilitarianism?

A
  • a type of consequentialism
  • consequences of our actions determine which actions are right or wrong

—> concerned with the GREATEST GOOD for the GREATEST NUMBER of people.

The end justifies the means.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the deontological approach?

A
  • type of objectivism
  • Proposes that there should be universal rules for moral conduct that always applies across situations
  • CERTAIN ACTIONS are inherently RIGHT, and other actions are INHERENTLY WRONG.
  • it is NOT the consequence of the action that determines whether one has acted in a right or wrong way.
  • When faced with an ethical dilemma, act in ways that are in line with duties and obligations
  • Stress that we should always act according to the objective rules of what is right and wrong
  • treat others as we would like to be treated.

(aka not focussed on the consequence, but rather the action itself)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Virtue ethics?

A
  • focusses on a person’s character traits and internal virtues
  • underlying premise revolves around thinking about the questions of “What person do i want to be”
  • aims for CONSISTENCY between virtue, morals and actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the strengths of utilitarianism?

A
  • Rational/Common sense
  • Consistent
  • Beneficence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe how utilitarianism is rational.

A

If one accepts the notion of greater food, then it makes sense to base actions on whether or not it benefits as many people as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe how utilitarianism is consistent

A

It is consistent because it applies to all cases - whatever situation, the decision to be made is the one that benefits the most people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the weaknesses of utilitarianism?

A
  • Simplistic
  • Marginalises minorities
  • Sometimes it is complex to determine what the greatest good really is - and which outcome will actually benefit the greatest number…

(what is the greatest good? happiness? money?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the strengths of deontology?

A
  • Consistent
  • Takes into account special obligations
  • Great concern for justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the weaknesses of deontology?

A
  • Conflicting duties and obligations - hard to reconcile
  • Not situational - ignores the context
  • Doesn’t really promote beneficience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is deontology consistent?

A
  • Clear moral boundaries can be applied universally and in all situations –> to uphold duties and obligations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does deontology take into account special obligations?

A
  • As it emphasises upholding duties and obligations, one can decide to prioritise their family over strangers, for example.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe how conflicting duties is a weakness of deontology.

A
  • As decisions are not situational or context based, and made primarily on obligations, it is difficult to reconcile conflicting duties. Obligations are viewed as absolute or concrete, and don’t change regardless of one’s emotions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is deontology not necessarily benevolent?

A
  • ignores circumstance, and doesn’t take into account ones emotional attachment
  • doesn’t take into account benefits of those who are involved, and only the decision-maker’s obligations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the limitations of virtue ethics?

A
  • How do we know what is considered to be virtuous?
  • How do we decide which virtue is more important?
  • Should we observe a virtuous person in action to learn?

Difficult to learn and thus, implement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the limitations of ethical theories?

A
  • Too general, abstract and inadequate to guide decision making in complex situations.
  • Must enrich it with other conceptual tools.
17
Q

What are the five key ethical principles?

A
  • Autonomy
  • Non-maleficience
  • Beneficience
  • Fidelity
  • Justice
18
Q

What does autonomy refer to?

A
  • A person’s right to act as an autonomous agent.
  • Recognises that people are capable of making their own DECISIONS and are RESPONSIBLE for their own ACTIONS and BEHAVIOURS.

–> psychologist must respect one’s right to make their own decisions and how to live their life. Cannot coerce or put undue influence onto clients.

19
Q

What are the limits to autonomy?

A
  • DOESN’T imply UNLIMITED FREEDOM
  • DOESN’T permit INFRINGEMENT of other’s rights: Legal rights, causing harm, depriving others of autonomy.
  • Autonomy assumes COMPETENCE = possession of a fully rational, adult mild. Difficult to support autonomy if affected by illness/substance abuse.
20
Q

What have some researchers argued about autonomy?

A
  • it now dominates the ethical landscape at the cost of other principles
  • has exposed a dark side - increase of egotism and selfish society
21
Q

What is non-maleficience?

A
  • do not cause any harm
  • protecting welfare and rights of the community
  • includes errors of acting and failing to act in the client’s best interest.
  • rules out acts that invade, violate or thwart the welfare of the community.

eg. failing to warn clients of a side effect of a drug

22
Q

What are some possible limits on harm????

A
  • frequency
  • Intensity
  • duration

eg. short term negative emotion that can be elicited within a therapy session
eg. treatment that employs punishment and aversion therapy - are the client’s negative experiences justified?

23
Q

what is beneficence?

A
  • obligation to do positive for someone
  • trying to do good
  • protects rights of clients, and welfare.

very important in health profession

24
Q

What are the limitations of beneficence?

A
  • Beneficence can often conflict with other principles.
  • Due to psychologists’ OWN way of thinking, they may believe they know what is best for the client…

THUS —> violate autonomy and respect for the client
and potential to DO HARM increases

eg. stolen generation

25
Q

What is justice?

A
  • Concerned with the distribution of benefits and costs.
  • distributing resources in fair manner
  • judging competing claims.

all decisions should be made in fair or transparent bases, not influenced by personal biases, prejudices and preconceptions.

Psychs should disregard differences that may exist b/w individuals and set aside personal biases.

EQUALTY!!! <33333

26
Q

What is fidelity?

A
  • Faithfulness and Responsibility
  • Clients trust their psychologists. Psychologists must comply with their obligations
  • fulfil both IMPLICIT and EXPLICIT contracts.
  • sensitive nature of relationship can often create a POWER IMBALANCE, so its the psychologists’ responsibility to ensure that they don’t abuse their power…
  • CONSENT - clients must be fully aware of the limits to confidentiality and privacy
27
Q

What is an implicit contract?

A
  • psychologists are responsible for the welfare of client

- not said explicity, but it is implied.

28
Q

What is an explicit contract?

A
  • Psychologists agree to provide the best practice standards of care in return for the fee of services.
29
Q

What are the three aspects of informed consent????

A
  1. capacity to give informed consent
  2. client has been given all relevant information (eg. limits to confidentiality)
  3. voluntary consent
30
Q

What can be limits to applying the ethical principles to a client?

A
  • principles are binding, yet sometimes can conflict.
  • if client is threatening to hurt someone else… then create a hierarchy of priorities.

Psychologist also has a responsibility to do good for and inflict no harm on others/public, hence, it is possible to prioritise these principles over the client’s autonomy.

in this case… violation of autonomy to uphold other principles.

Ethics & Professional Issues (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions