Module 4: Comorbidity and the role of family and friends Flashcards
1.Describe why substance abuse often co-occurs with other disorders (explanatory models) [paraphrasing] 2.Recognize psychological symptoms that are induced by addictive substances and withdrawal 3.Indicate why it is important for diagnosis and treatment to consider comorbidity [analyzing] 4.Knowledge of common co-morbid substance abuse disorders [paraphrasing] 5.Recognize diagnosis of addiction and comorbid disorder for a case [evaluating] 6.Give advice on (the order of) diagnosing and trea
How comorbid is substance abuse with other symptoms?
50% of those treated for addiction have another mental disorder. The most common include mood disorders, anxiety disorders, personality disorders and ADHD. Some complains can be worsened by substance abuse.
Opinions on supporting those with substance abuse
Some believe you should disconnect or may blame themselves and have to deal with sadness, depression, anger, confusion, powerlessness and insecurity. Can be conflicts, domestic violence, financial problems and disrupted relationships with children. Have more relationship problems.
Johnson intervention
Involves confrontation and is radical and direct. Seen as last chance to reach out and rescue the addict
AI Anon
Based on 12 steps of AA and the aim is to help close relatives accept they are powerless and help them detach with love
CRAFT method
Protocolized treatment where close relatives are supported by practitioner to adjust behaviour to motivate the patient to start treatment. Based on CBT and MI. Important elements include:
- functional analysis
- emergency plan
- positive reinforcement of desired behaviour
- not rewarding unwanted behaviour
- improving quality of own life
- propose to start treatment
- communication training
BCT
Close relative actively involved in treatment. Aims are: teaching effective ways to cope with substance, teach partner to reinforce behaviour change and improve relationship satisfaction and reduce stress by enhancing positive reward exchanges, boosting communication patterns and problem-solving. Has a large effect on relationship satisfaction but a weak-moderate effect on substance abuse, but relationship satisfaction is a protective factor. Only used when individual therapy is ineffective and severe triggering relationship issues.
What affects comorbidity?
Can range from 12-80% which depends on sample recruitment characteristics for example being in a primary care setting, not seeking treatment and drug of abuse. Variations can be due to availability and accessibility of substances, drug treatment policies and methodological differences
Epidemiology
- most prevalent diagnosis was major depression (17%) and induced depression was 10%. Drug use showed that more than half the sample actively consumed more than 1 substance
- alcohol use disorder ranges from 2% to 4% and lifetime prevalence 13%, with MD is 21%
- cannabis use associated with alcohol at an early age correlates with comorbid psychiatric disorder
- patients with depressive disorder more likely to be nicotine dependent
- those with nicotine dependence more likely to develop mood disorder
- comorbid SUD and MD more likely in female European population
Why could there be a high joint occurrence of SUD and MD?
- share common risk factors
- use of substances induces neurobiological changes which can mediate MD
- SUD can soothe MD symptoms
- common symptoms between addiction and mood disorders
Neurobiological mechanisms?
- monoaminergic neurotransmission systems
- hypothalamus pituitary axis
- immunological system
- neurotrophic factors
- endocannabinoid system
- food intake, metabolism and circadian rhythm control system
- reward circuits
Issues with differentiating between MD and SUD
- acute or chronic effects of substance use can mimic MD symptoms
- MDs are syndromes as they do not have identifiable biological markers
- structured interviews based on behavioural symptoms can maximize the extent to which information an be applied to the same criteria to achieve diagnosis
- methodological differences can lead to differences in prevalence
-PRISM demonstrates good psychometric properties
How to differentiate MD symptoms from being independent to substance-induced MD?
- Independent (excessive amount of substance, symptoms precede substance use, symptoms persist after withdrawal
- induced (episode occurs during substance use and is relevant to the disorder
- expected effects are physiological effects due to intoxication
- one form is a sudden change in substance intake before onset of depressive symptoms -> induced by SUD
- depressive symptoms during stable consumption or after withdrawal, family history of depression, good response to antidepressants suggest independent depression
What is the course and prognosis?
When diagnosed with induced MD or MD with SUD, when reevaluated were reclassified as being affected by independent MD. Could be due to higher probability of induced disorder with drug dependence or alcohol, or that those more vulnerable for MD was precipitate by substance use. Diagnosis for MD was masked by substance consumption. Those that have both SUD and MD show a more severe clinical course but less response to treatment. CAn manifest in other medical, psychiatric and substance use comorbidities
Pharmacological treatment
- antidepressant drugs improve comorbid depression with alcohol dependence but not depression that occurs with cocaine or opiate dependence. SSRIs found not to be effective
- treating depressed substance-dependent patients with antidepressants does not directly improve substance use. There is some reduction but not on abstinence or total remission
- depression medication and alcohol dependence medication reduces symptoms of both disorders
- safety of treatment due to comorbid physical illness and risk of interactions with other drugs
- potential for abuse of certain drugs
Psychosocial interventions
Can be a growning number of combined treatments available, data about MI and CBT show no superiority, can significantly correlate with alcohol abstinence and nonsignificantly with MD outcome. The effect sizes are smaller for CBT treatments than antidepressants. BRIGHT uses a community-based effectiveness trial which compares residential substance abuse treatment with residential treatment. Showed better clinical outcomes with adherence to treatment and improvement in severity of depressive symptoms. Treatment of comorbid MD and SUD need to take both disorders into account.