Module 4 Flashcards
Identifying the important material in the text
Summarizing
Restating the material in own words
Summarizing
Rewriting the text in the most concise version
Summarizing
5 Qualities of a Good Summary
- Comprehensive
- Brief
- Accurate
- Neutral
- Independent
conveys all important information
Comprehensive
conveys information concisely
Brief
correctly conveys the author’s
Accurate
avoids arguments concerning the text’s topic
Neutral
it makes sense to someone who has not read the source text
Independent
This comprehensive question asks for the general subject of the text.
What is the topic of the selection?
This comprehensive question is the central idea or argument the author is making about the topic.
What is the author’s main point about the topic?
These comprehensive question are details, evidence, or examples that back up the main point.
What are the supporting points?
A Good Summary has 3 parts
- Opening section
- Body
- Conclusion
This part contains title, author, some publication information, and main idea of the original text
Opening Section
This part presents in your own words the author’s supporting points for the thesis statement
Body
This part restates of the main idea
Conclusion
Provides a concise overview of the main ideas and key details of a text.
Informative Summary
Focuses on delivering facts without much interpretation.
Informative Summary
Objective and neutral, simply stating what the text is about.
Informative Summary
Summary that focus on what the text says.
Informative Summary
Goes beyond summarizing by also clarifying and analyzing the information.
Explanatory Summary
May explain complex ideas in simpler terms.
Explanatory Summary
Helps the reader understand the significance or implications of the content.
Explanatory Summary
Summary that focus on how and why the information matters.
Explanatory Summary
3 Reporting Verbs
- Neutral
- Tentative
- Strong
This reporting verb used to say what the writer describes in factual terms, demonstrates, refers to, and discusses, and verbs used to explain his/her methodology.
Neutral Verb
This reporting verb used to say what the writer suggests or speculates on (without being absolutely certain)
Tentative Verb
This reporting verb used to say what the writer makes strong arguments and claims for
Strong Verb
Example verbs: describe, show, study, demonstrate, note, point out, indicate, report, observe, assume, take into consideration, examine, go on to say that, state, believe(unless this is a strong belief), mention, etc.
Neutral Verb
Example verbs: suggest, speculate, intimate, hypothesize, moot, imply, propose, recommend, posit the view that, question the view that, postulate, etc.
Tentative Verb
Example verbs: argue, claim, emphasize, contend, maintain, assert, theorize, support the view that, deny, negate, refute, reject, challenge. strongly believe that, counter the view/argument that, etc.
Strong Verb
Restating the material in own words
Paraphrasing
Including all ideas in the original
Paraphrasing
May be longer than the original
Paraphrasing
4 Qualities of a Good Paraphrase
- Thorough
- Accurate
- Fair
- Objective
includes all of the author’s primary ideas
Thorough
reflects what the author actually wrote
Accurate
uses carefully chosen or indiscriminative words
Fair
avoids stating own opinion on the topic of the source text
Objective
3 Paraphrasing Strategies
- Changing words
- Changing sentence structures
- Combining or splitting sentences
Combines information from multiple sources
Synthesis
Includes analysis of the combined information
Synthesis
Emphasizes the similarities and differences among the
information from different sources
Synthesis
Rhetorical Triangle
Ethos, Pathos, Logos
The communicator’s use of credibility to obtain
the audience’s trust
Ethos
Critical reading requires looking into how an
author tries to influence the readers using this
particular element of rhetoric
Ethos
Asks the questions about the author
Ethos
Who is the author?
Ethos
What is the author’s profession?
Ethos
Which company or organization is the author affiliated?
Ethos
What is the authority of the author on the subject of the text?
Ethos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Credible sources
Ethos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Respect for audience
Ethos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Common ground with audience
Ethos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Expertise
Ethos
The communicator’s use of emotions to
influence the audience
Pathos
Critical reading requires looking into how an
author tries to influence the readers using this
particular element of rhetoric
Pathos
Who is the intended audience?
Pathos
What is the writer-reader relationship?
Pathos
How does the author hook the intended
reader? (e.g. humor, emotion, logic)
Pathos
How does the author keep the reader
reading?
Pathos
How am I responding to these appeals?
Pathos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Anecdotes or other narratives
Pathos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Images or other forms of media
Pathos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Direct quotations
Pathos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Humor
Pathos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Emotive words
Pathos
The communicator’s use of logic, reason, or rational
thinking in influencing the audience
Logos
Critical reading requires looking into how an author
tries to influence the readers using this particular
element of rhetoric
Logos
Do I find the argument convincing?
Logos
What evidences are presented to support the writer’s
claim?
Logos
What views and counter arguments are omitted?
Logos
How does the author’s purpose fit with my
purpose for reading?
Logos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Facts
Logos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Examples
Logos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Authority
Logos
Use of ____ comes in the form of Deductive/Inductive Reasoning
Logos
two-paragraph summary and response essay
Reader Response
way to express the reader’s comprehension of
the text
Reader Response
way to express the reader’s critical reading of
the text
Reader Response
prompts a reader to examine, explain, and often defend personal reaction to a reading
Reader Response
prompts a reader to explore reasons for liking the reading material, agreeing with the author, or finding the text informative or confusing
Reader Response
is evaluated based on how the reader is able to
explain his/her reaction to the material
Reader Response
is not evaluated based on the correctness of the
reaction because there is no “right” or “wrong” when
it comes to reactions
Reader Response
4 Qualities of a Good Reader Response
- Honest
- Informed
- Clear
- Well Supported
Focuses on sincere and thoughtful reactions to the
read text
Honest
Answers questions as What gives rise to your reactions?
Honest
Answers questions as How do they affect your reading of the author’s work
Honest
Responses should not be naïve, shortsighted, or
biased
Honest
Responses are based on clear understanding of the
source text
Honest
Responses includes information about the topic,
author or reading
Honest
Make clear your reactions, and how your reactions
relate to the text (thesis statement)
Clear
Provide an opening and closing section
Clear
Use precise language
Clear
Provides textual evidence
Well-Supported
Examples from the text
Well-Supported
Quotations of some phrases or opinion the
author
Well-Supported
Process of Writing a Reader Response
- Prewrite
- Draft
- Edit & Revise
Ask your self questions:
What was significant?
What do I remember?
What did i react to (like/dislike)?
Was there something I did not understand?
Prewrite
Write the summary and response. Support your reaction with textual evidence.
Draft
Review your response by asking questions
Are they honest?
Are they informed?
Are they clear?
Are they well supported?
Edit & Revise
Explore your responses to the reading as you ________
annotate the text
Jot down key words
Annotating the text
Use of punctuation marks (? ! *)
Annotating the text
Ask questions about author’s ideas
Annotating the text
Relate author’s ideas or information from text to prior
knowledge on the subject
Annotating the text
common errors in reasoning
logical fallacies
Making a broad conclusion based on too little evidence.
Hasty Generalization
Assuming that because one event happened before another, the first caused the second.
False Cause
Comparing two things that aren’t actually similar in a meaningful way.
Weak Analogy
Presenting only two options when more exist or obviously that you’ll choose that one choice only
Either/Or
Introducing and summarizing the reading selection
Draft
Stating and explaining your responses clearly and concisely
Draft
Provide the title of the text
Introducing and summarizing the reading selection
Identify the author
Introducing and summarizing the reading selection
Provide the main idea
Introducing and summarizing the reading selection
Provide the supporting points
Introducing and summarizing the reading selection
State a clear thesis in one sentence
Stating and explaining your responses clearly and concisely
Provide supporting ideas for the thesis statement
Stating and explaining your responses clearly and concisely
Provide specific examples from the selection
Stating and explaining your responses clearly and concisely
Writing a thesis statement for a reader response
Thesis statement = topic (reading selection) + your reaction