Module 3: MRA and Logrithmic Form Flashcards
When do you consider to take the natural log of the dependent variable?
1) has no zeros and is most often greater than 1
2) has a wide range
3) is measured in dollars
What is the general format to interpreting log-log forms?
A one percent increase in x leads to a B percent increase in y
Note: coefficients are elasicities
What is the general format to interpreting level-log forms?
A one unit increase in x leads to an approximate 100*B percent increase in y
Note: also called semi-elasticities
Interpret the variable tenure for the following regression
ln(wage)=0.56+0.09educ -0.253female -0.007female*educ+0.17ln(tenure) -0.025 nonwhite
Each one percent increase in tenure is associtated with a 0.17% increase in wage
At mean of duration and wage, its an $.11 raise every 6 months
What is the exact formula? When do we use it?
exact=100*(e^(B-1))
When the coefficient of B is greater than 0.1
Given the regression, interprect the impact of tenure on wage
ln(wage)=0.56+0.083educ -0.189female -0.008female*educ+0.047tenure -0.001tenure^2 -0.027nonwhite
Mean of tenure = 5.1
An additonal year on the job is expected to add 3.7% to hourly wage
wage=100(e^(0.047-0.0025.1)-1)
T/F: You can compare adjusted R^2s from similar log-log and level-log regressions.
F: they are different functional forms and cannot be compared from R^2s
What are the null and alternative hypothesis for the Ramsey RESET test?
H0: B = 0, there is no misspecification
Ha: B != 0, model is misspecified
Want high p-values for this test
What can you do when you find evidence of misspecification with the RESET test?
1) Look for an appropriate squared term
2) Take the natural log of y or an x, as appropriate
3) include appropriate interactions
4) consider the linear model if a nonlinear is chosen
Interpret female in the following regression
ln(wage)=0.56+0.083educ -0.189female -0.008female*educ+0.047tenure -0.001tenure^2 -0.027nonwhite
When mean educ is 12.6 years
At the mean level of educ, females earn 25% less per hour than their male counterparts.
100[exp(-0.189-0.00812.6)-1]=-25.2
Interpret educ given the following regression
ln(wage)=0.56+0.083educ -0.189female -0.008female*educ+0.047tenure -0.001tenure^2 -0.027nonwhite
An additional year of education is expected to add 7.8% to hourly wage for woman and 8.7% for men.
100*[exp(0.083-0.008female)-1]