Module 3: Leadership Theories and Styles

Question 1

Power and Leadership:

Answer 1

Power is an integral aspect of leadership, as it influences the ability to influence and motivate others towards achieving goals. In this section, we will examine the relationship between power and leadership, exploring different sources of power and their implications for leadership effectiveness

Question 2

Sources of Power

Answer 2

Legitimate Power
Reward Power
Coercive Power
Expert Power
Referent Power

Question 3

Legitimate Power

Answer 3

Derived from formal authority and positions of leadership within an organization.

Question 4

Reward Power

Answer 4

Based on the ability to provide rewards or incentives to others.

Question 5

Coercive Power

Answer 5

Stemming from the ability to punish or impose negative consequences.

Question 6

Expert Power

Answer 6

Gained through knowledge, skills, and expertise in a particular area.

Question 7

Referent Power

Answer 7

Built on personal charisma, trust, and admiration from others

Question 8

Implications for Leadership

Answer 8

Understanding the various sources of power enables leaders to leverage them appropriately to influence and motivate others. Effective leaders recognize that relying solely on coercive power can breed resistance and negativity, while drawing on expert power and referent power fosters engagement and commitment from followers.

Question 9

Leadership Theories

Answer 9

eadership theories provide frameworks for understanding and explaining different aspects of leadership behavior and effectiveness. In this section, we will explore three prominent leadership theories

Question 10

Leadership Theories

Answer 10

Trait Theory
Behavioral Theory
Contingency Theory

Question 11

Trait Theory

Answer 11

Trait theory suggests that effective leaders possess certain inherent traits or characteristics that contribute to their leadership success. These traits may include intelligence, self-confidence, determination, and integrity. While this theory acknowledges the role of personal qualities, it also recognizes the importance of situational factors and the need for a diverse set of traits to adapt to different contexts.

Question 12

Behavioral Theory

Answer 12

Behavioral theory focuses on the actions and behaviors of leaders rather than their personal traits. It suggests that effective leadership is a result of specific behaviors, such as task-oriented behaviors (setting goals, providing direction) and relationship-oriented behaviors (supporting, developing relationships). This theory emphasizes the importance of adaptable leadership styles based on the situation and the needs of followers.

Question 13

Contingency Theory:

Answer 13

Contingency theory proposes that the effectiveness of leadership depends on the fit between a leader’s style and the demands of the situation. It suggests that different leadership styles are appropriate in different situations. For example, a more directive leadership style may be effective in a crisis, while a participative style may be more suitable in a collaborative decision-making process.

Question 14

Leadership Styles

Answer 14

Autocratic Leadership
Democratic -Leadership
Laissez-Faire -Leadership

Question 15

Autocratic Leadership

Answer 15

: Autocratic leaders make decisions independently, with little or no input from their team members. They exercise control, provide clear directions, and expect strict adherence to their instructions. While this style can be efficient in certain situations, it may limit employee empowerment and creativity.

Question 16

Democratic Leadership

Answer 16

Democratic leaders involve team members in the decision-making process, seeking their input and considering their perspectives. They promote collaboration, encourage participation, and value diverse opinions. This style fosters engagement and commitment from team members and often leads to more innovative solutions.

Question 17

Laissez-Faire Leadership

Answer 17

Laissez-faire leaders adopt a hands-off approach, providing minimal guidance and leaving the decision-making and problem-solving primarily to the team members. While this style allows for autonomy and creativity, it may result in a lack of direction and accountability.