Module 3 - Addiction Flashcards

1
Q

What are the alcohol recommendations?

A
Men : 3-4 units/d
Women : 2-3 units/d
>2 alcohol free days
2016 UK advice: 
Men & Women : 14 units/week
Binge : 2x daily guidelines
men       : 8+ 
women  : 6+
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is harmful substance use?

A

Actual damage should have been caused to the mental or physical health of the user in the absence of diagnosis of dependence syndrome.
Addiction more likely if faster onset/faster brain entry of drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is dependence syndrome?

A

A strong desire or sense of compulsion to take the substance
Difficulties in controlling substance taking behaviour in terms of its onset, termination, or levels of use
A physiological withdrawal state when substance use has stopped or been reduced
Evidence of tolerance: need to take more to get same effect
Progressive neglect of alternative interests
Persisting with substance use despite clear evidence of overtly harmful consequences
DSM-5: a continuum between abuse and dependence called substance use disorder
Kohn 2004 Less than 10% patients with alcohol dependence are treated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the different models of addiction?

A

Incentive –Sensitization Model (Robinson and Berridge, 1993)
Addiction renders systems hypersensitive (“sensitized”) to drugs and drug-associated stimuli via the Mesolimbic dopaminergic system.
These sensitized systems mediate a component of reward termed incentive salience or “wanting” (not pleasure or “liking”). The cue becomes overvalued and resistant to devaluation: a “motivational magnet” that activates a “hedonic hotspot”.
Drug-induced sensitization of brain systems (DA) that mediate incentive-salience causes drugs and drug-associated stimuli to become compulsively “wanted”
The activation of the sensitized system can occur both implicitly or explicitly. Challenges: Applied to stimulants primarily and Harder to show in man
Physical dependence - negative reinforcement
Some drugs produce physical dependence and withdrawal symptoms upon cessation of drug-taking.
Withdrawal symptoms are produced by the body in order to compensate for the unusual effects of the drug. Withdrawal symptoms are generally the opposite of the effect produced by the drug. Addicts continue to use drugs in order to avoid withdrawal. Over time, drugs no longer have the same rewarding effects - they merely allow the person to feel “normal.”
BUT not all abused drugs generate withdrawal symptoms (cocaine, amphetamine).
Different drugs produce different withdrawal symptoms with different neural bases.
Once dependent you should continue taking drug, but people spontaneously stop.
Once drug-abstinent and withdrawal symptoms gone, users should not relapse, but they do.
No explanation as to why people take drugs in the first place.
Volkow’s diagram between control, drive, reward and memory and output.
Another Volkow diagram: addicted brain has less activity of the anterior cingulate cortex, inferior prefrontal cortex and lateral orbiofrontal cortex andmore activity int he medical orbitofrontal cortex. The medial OFC increases glutamate to the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area. From here, there is reduced DA to the ACC, inferior PFC and lateral OFC and less GABA to the dorsal striatum and motor cortex (so there is increased output).
The final component is from the amygdala and hippocampus. The activity here is also increased, with more glutamate, corticotrophin-releasing factor, NA, and kappa receptors for the NAcc and VTA. These regions are involved with binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect and preoccupation/anticipation. Also voluntary to habitual use of drugs (Everitt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discuss how the dopaminergic system is affected by drugs of abuse:

A

Hijacked by some, including alcohol and nicotine. But not opioids, THC.
DA release by amphetamine almost 7x that of food, 5x of sex. Nicotine and morphine are similar to levels for sex, cocaine is 2x food.
Alcohol, opiates, nicotine increase dopamine neuron firing in VTA
Cocaine, Amphetamine
block reuptake
but amphetamine enhances release of DA too.
Increases in dopamine levels in striatum are associated with reinforcing effects of stimulants in man.
Volkow - Modafinil increased DA activity with no changes in behaviour.
Hypothesised that low levels of D2 receptors predispose subjects to use drugs
genetic data is controversial
involvement of D2 receptors levels in reinforcing responses to drugs in man also not demonstrated BUT is in Volkow 1999
Eg. Morgan 2002 separate monkeys and then together - subordinate monkeys took more cocaine (statistically significant) initially, over 1 year they became more similar in habits. Environmental risk>D2 binding?
We also found that, over a 1-year period in which cocaine intake increased steadily, D2 receptor availability decreased irrespective of what the initial levels of D2 receptor availability were for each monkey (figure 1b). Nader 2006
Highly impulsive rats have lower D2/D3 receptors – particularly in ventral striatum and consume more cocaine Dalley 2007. More self-administration but Impulsivity does not predict acquisition or heroin self-administration, its escalation or relapse after extinction McNamara.
Monkeys with shorter latency are assumed to be more impulsive and were quicker to approach novel objects. These monkeys then became subordinates.

What happens when the dopaminergic system is continuously or often stimulated by drugs, the brain gets depleted in dopamine and dopaminergic function is reduced.
associated with irritability, low mood - Reduced DRD2 cocaine, methamphetamine, alcohol.
Overall reduction: 10% in Alcohol and 12% in Cocaine studies.
And show blunted amphetamine induced dopamine release
NB: for opioids, nicotine, cannabis – robust consistent reductions in dopamine receptor levels have NOT been found.
decreased DA brain function in addicts - reduced baseline DA flow
decreased DA responsiveness would make cocaine less reinforcing - did get less of a high than in normals
the blunted response to Mp in cocaine addicts does not support an enhancement of DA release involved in reinforcing effects of cocaine in man
thalamus is part of relay between orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens Volkow 1999
Amphetamine-induced DA release blunted in cocaine addicts and “high DA transmission is associated with treatment response”
Martinez 2007
11C-PHNO binding: no differences between control & alcohol dependent groups except increase in hypothalamus Erritzoe 2014
Stimulant and Gambling: Correlations implicate D3 receptor levels in motivation, impulsiveness and risky decision-making
Schulz - if there is a cue, more DA to cue and if there is no reward after the cue, DA neuronal firing decreases.
Cocaine cues increase dopamine levels in the dorsal but not ventral striatum Volkow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What imaging is available for addiction?

A

fMRI exploits changes in magnetic properties of the blood - BOLD signal is the ratio change in oxyhaemoglobin to deoxyhaemoglobin in the venous blood vessels of the brain (indirect measure of neuronal activity) (More oxyhaemoglobin leads to less dephasing and more signal)
PET: glucose metabolism decreased in cocaine user
MAO B decreased in smoker
DA transporters decreased in meth user
Raclopride: D2 receptors decreased in cocaine -> fewer receptors available and therefore more used and more DA activity.
Mitchell 2012 - alcohol also releases endogenous opioids (in orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens and ventral striatum.) (reduces
11C-carfentanil
binding in PET)
MRI - alcohol damaged brain show some atrophy and enlarged ventricles.
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (Hermann) - excessive central glutamate and after lorazepam/diazepam treatment for 2 weeks, glutamate levels back to healthy controls.
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - Acamprosate did the same (Umhau)
11C-DASB- and 18F-altanserin-PET for MDMA and serotonin receptor 2A and SERT.
fMRI: Neural Activation Patterns of Methamphetamine-Dependent Subjects During Decision-Making Predict Relapse Paulus 2005 and Attenuated Insular Processing During Risk Predicts Relapse in Early Abstinent Methamphetamine-Dependent Individuals Gowin 2014
fMRI Response to Alcohol Pictures Predicts Subsequent Transition to Heavy Drinking in College Students Dager 2014 (compared with other risk factors (e.g., alcoholism family history, impulsivity), BOLD response best predicted escalating drinking amount and alcohol-related problems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does GABA and opioids interact with DA?

A

Opioids inhibit GABA which inhibits DA.
GABA neurotransmission in VTA is via:
GABA-B receptor
Substances release natural endorphins (also released by exercise) which inhibits GABA so more DA firing. Opioid antagonists, eg. naltrexone, prevent DA firing.
Colasanti - amphetamine releases endogenous opioids. Mitchell 2012 - alcohol also releases endogenous opioids (in orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens and ventral striatum.) (reduces
11C-carfentanil
binding in PET)
Heinz 2005 - In alcohol dependence: increased opioid target/receptor availability is associated with greater craving for alcohol.
Not found in alcoholics abstinent for longer but do have blunted amphetamine induced opioid/b-endorphin release
No difference in opioid receptor availability in pathological gamblers Mick 2015 but did see blunted beta-endorphin.

Associated with impulsiveness (Love) and social play and stress.

Stress results in activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and rise in cortisol.
Opioids modulate hypothalamic function and B-endorphin is released by pituitary with ACTH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What pharmacotherapies are available for alcohol dependence?

A

Malcolm 2000 - multiple previous detoxifications associated with less responsive treatment and cognitive impairment Duke 2003

Substitution - benzodiazepines.
DA-ergic agonists (eg. bromocriptine, disulfiram (inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase so there is a build up of acetaldehyde and nausea, vomiting, flushing, headache, palpitations, hypotension, but not if psychosis, severe liver or cardiac disease or epilepsy, also increases DA by inhibiting DA-beta-hydroxylase and therefore NA reduces), methylphenidate, amphetamine, bupropion (DAT reuptake blocker) to reduce dysphoria and irritability.
Withdrawal - Benzodiazepines reduce signs and symptoms of withdrawal +/- acamprosate. Carbamazepine (glutamatergic anticonvulsant) as alternative to benzodiazepine.
Abstinence -
Acamprosate (taurine derivative) is a partial agonist at the modulatory site and reduces NMDA activity via AMPA and mGluR5. Increases abstinence rates by double to <40% after 1 year. As effective as naltrexone (Jonas 2014)
D2 antagonists, eg. antipsychotics, to prevent ‘high’
Baclofen is typical GABA-B agonist which has been shown to improve abstinence rates in alcohol dependence (reduces self-admin of cocaine, cues, alcohol, heroin (Xi) Lots of RCTs show varied results, eg. BACLAD (68% vs 24% placebo) and ALPADIR (11.9% vs 10.5%)
Other drugs that increase GABA levels have similar effect
Tiagabine, vigabatrin, gabapentin, topiramate
Naltrexone (opioid antagonist) also used in pathological gambling, self-injurious behaviour, binge eating, kleptomania, compulsive sexual behaviour. (best in those with anxiety) Nalmefene (mu opiate antagonist, kappa partial agonist, blocks increase in kappa activity in dependence, reducing dysphoria, etc.) reduces drinking while drinking, as needed. Mann 2013
To prevent harm -
Vitamins, nutrition, neuroinflammation, reduce sharing of needles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does alcohol work on a molecular level?

A

Dopamine: mood altering, euphoria, positive reinforcement, craving. Low levels of DRD2 seen in stimulant & alcohol addicts.
Release of dopamine – blunted to none.
Can get ‘high’ without detectable increase in dopamine
Opioid: positive reinforcement, euphoria, craving
GABA-Bdz/GABA-A: ‘agonist’ : sedation, anxiolytic, amnesia, ataxia
Glutamate: NMDA ‘antagonist’, sedation, amnesia, withdrawal
a5IA (inverse agonist) reverses the alcohol induced impairment because stops GABA-A from decreasing memory. Nutt 2007

In the acute setting, it allows more Cl- through GABA-A receptors and antagonises NMDA to reduce Ca2+ flux excitation.

In chronic: NMDA receptors are upregulated (this is associated with memory impairment)
the GABA-A receptors become less efficient at allowing Cl- through.
This is from tolerance, but acutely drinking reverses the chronic effects temporarily.

Withdrawal:
Increased activity in NMDA receptor and Ca2+ influx via L-subtype Ca2+ channels -> hyper-excitability cell death. There is overall decreased GABA-ergic activity and decreased inhibition by the Mg2+ of the NMDA receptor.
Hermann - excessive central glutamate and after lorazepam/diazepam treatment for 2 weeks, glutamate levels back to healthy controls and acamprosate (Umhau)

In abstinent, still have cognitive function issues and showed morphological changes that were highest in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of up to 20% but were noted also in the temporal cortex, insula, thalamus, and cerebellum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the drug therapies for opiate addiction?

A

Substitution - Blocks “on top” heroin.
Full opioid agonist.
Buprenorphine is a partial mu agonist (kappa antagonist) with a long half life and prolonged cover.. No/less risk of fatal respiratory depression. Less dysphoria.
Zubieta 2000 - at 16mg, all mu opioid receptors occupied.
Melichar - no reduction in availability of opioid receptors in presence of methadone.
Why substitution? stop street use & reduces crime
reduce iv risks - stop HIV
keep in health care => psychosocial treatment
easier w/drawal when ready - flexible dosing
Withdrawal - mydriasis, restlessness, diarrhoea, dysphoria, insomnia, noradrenergic storm -> tachycardia, piloerection, sweating, rhinorrhoea, shivering because opioid inhibits conversion of ATP to cAMP so upregulation of the enzyme if chronic use and then when stop there is excessive NA.
Lofexidine for detoxification
Naltrexone for relapse prevention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What drugs are available for cocaine, amphetamine, etc addiction?

A

Trials but nothing recommended.
Eg. Methylphenidate Enhances ACC Functioning and Reduces Impulsivity in Cocaine Addiction Goldstein 2010
Modafinil Improves Learning in Methamphetamine Dependence by Enhancing Neural Functioning Ghahremani 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a drug?

A

“a chemical which when taken produces physiological changes” - Nutt
Depressants
alcohol
opioids
benzodiazepines – barbiturates
GHB – GBL – Butanediol
ketamine
Stimulants
cocaine – crack
amphetamine – metamphetamine
MDMA - BZP
Psychedelics
LSD – psylocybin [mushrooms]
salvinorum
Cannabis
Class A medicine: opioid, methamphetamie, IV amphetamine
Class B medicine: Amphetamine, barbiturates, ketamine
Class C medicine: Benzodiazepines, GHB, buprenorphine, steroids, growth horme
Class A not currently medically recognised: cocaine, MDMA, LSD, psilocybin (crack cocaine never medical)
Class B not currently medically recognised: cannabis
Class C not currently medically recognised: clenbuterol (benzylpiperazine never medical)
A B C
possession 7 5 2 yrs
supply etc life 14 14 yrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the possible harms caused by drugs?

A

Acute focal harm to self: Vomiting, Boerhaave, choking, death (alcohol), infection, skin popping (heroin)
Acute systemic harm to self: Infection, respiratory depression (opiates), hypothermia (ketamine, alcohol), hyperthermia (MDMA), cerebral oedema (MDMA), hyponatraemia (MDMA), confusion/delirium (ketaine), paranoia/delusional states (cannabis, cocaine, metamphetamine), anxiety attacks (all)
Chronic focal harm to self: Septum (cocaine), amphetamine tooth loss
Chronic systemic harm to self: withdrawal/dependency, cystic bladder (ketamine), Wernicke’s (alcohol), peripheral neuropathy (alcohol), malnutrition, liver disease/cirrhosis (khat and alcohol), hepatitis (MDMA), MI, stroke (cocaine, cocaethylene),
Harm to society: STI spread from date rape, foetal alcohol syndrome, disability in under 24yo (alcohol), most common reason for death in men <50yo, A&E admissions, £3 billion cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the overall trends for cannabis and schizophrenia rates?

A

Hickman 2007: 20x increase cannabis users over last 40 years (Offending, Crime and Justice Survey, sample of approx. 10000, 74% response rate)
Frisher 2009 - schizophrenia hasn’t changed much in the last 20 years.
To prevent one case of schizophrenia one would have to prevent 5000 young men from ever smoking cannabis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the effects of MDMA:

A

60-120mg
• Increased energy
• Euphoria emotional warmth (better relationship with therapist? Oehen 2013)
- positive memories are more vivid and and positive and emotional and no difference in recalling worst memories compared to placebo.
• Empathy toward others
• Distortions in sensory and time perception
• Paranoia
Acute administration of MDMA in ecstasy users decrease the accuracy of facial fear recognition (Bedi 2010), attenuates responses to threatening faces in the amygdala (Bedi 2009), and enhances responses to happy expressions in the ventral striatum (Bedi 2009).
Recall and tolerance of traumatic memories increase (Oehen 2013) - 12 patients, not statistically significant if use clinician-administered PTSD Scale but is if patient reported questionnaire
PTSD trials relatively successful (Miethofer 2013)
Holland, 2006: 1580 subjects from childhood to early adulthood, 14 year period; Confirmed that childhood anxiety and depression preceded later use of E (Huizink et al, 2006) BUT Canada, 2012: 3880 10th grade students (15 y old) followed up after 1 year; Both MDMA use (OR 1.7) and meth/amphetamine use (OR 1.6) in grade 10 significantly increased the odds of elevated depressive symptoms in grade 11. (Briere et al, 2012)
Some studies have found that correction for sleep deprivation and disturbances removes the statistically indentified MDMA-intake related negative impact on mood (Scott 2013; Pirona and Morgan 2010; Huxster 2006).

But - serotonin depletion and therefore toxicity? Serotonin depletion not always associated with axonal death but not reactive gliosis, etc.
It inhibits SERT (serotonin transporter) in the presynaptic terminal, reducing serotonin transmission -> >1000% increase in serotonin, 200% DA. NE effects too.
SERT reversibility: ~212 days recovery time in striatum, similar in amygdala, thalamus, and midbrain, Cerebral SERT binding is reduced in MDMA users with a relatively short abstinence of 145 days
(Buchert 2003, Reneman 2001, McCann 20 but none in neocortex

ASL (MRI with arterial spin labelling to measure CBF)
Decrease CBF in right amygdala, hippocampal after MDMA (statistically significant) correlates with subjective intensity of effects
Left temporal pole activations increased with negative effects.
Decreased functional connectivity in medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus (associated with rumination, Berman 2011) - associated with positive effects.
Boosting serotonergic function with SSRIs leads to decreased amygdala activation to negative emotional
faces. Acute adminstration of MDMA, oxytocin, as well as Cannabidiol (CBD) all have similar effect (Bedi 2008; Fusar-Poli 2009) BUT Acute tryptophan depletion
leads to increased amygdala activation when processing negative emotional faces. Chronic MDMA use has same effect (Laursen 2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discuss how pathological gambling is similar to other addictions:

A

PG usually begins in childhood or teenage years, especially in men- much like other addictions
Both PGs and sufferers of other addictions self rate highly on tests of IMPULSIVITY and SENSATION SEEKING. These traits are also elevated in these groups on neuropsychiatric computerized tests such as CANTAB. Slutske
Persistent and recurrent problematic gambling behavior leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as indicated by the individual exhibiting four (or more) of the following in a 12-month period:
Needs to gamble with increasing amounts of money in order to achieve the desired excitement.
Is restless or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop gambling.
Has made repeated unsuccessful efforts to control, cut back, or stop gambling.
Is often preoccupied with gambling (e.g., having persistent thoughts of reliving past gambling experiences, handicapping or planning the next venture, thinking of ways to get money with which to gamble).
Often gambles when feeling distressed (e.g., helpless, guilty, anxious, depressed).
After losing money gambling, often returns another day to get even (“chasing” one’s losses).
Lies to conceal the extent of involvement with gambling.
Has jeopardized or lost a significant relationship, job, or educational or career opportunity because of gambling.
Relies on others to provide money to relieve desperate financial situations caused by gambling.
Episodic? Continuous? Early remission (3-12 months) vs sustained remission (>1 year)
Impairment in ventromedial PFC and Striatum (Petry 2015)
fMRI data are mixed with some studies showing lower striatal response during reward anticipation tasks than in controls ( Peters et al 2011)
Whereas others report an enhanced striatal response ( Jai et al 2011)
Potenza 2011: However, abnormal white matter in corpus callosum and superior longitudinal fasciculum was similar to substance misuse findings.

In Vietnam Era Twin registry ( Eisen et al 1998) reported that FAMILIAL FACTORS ( genetics and / or shared childhood experiences) explained 62% of the variance in the development of gambling disorder.
Substance use disorders 57.5% (Loraines 2011)
nicotine dependence 60.1%
alcohol abuse/dependence 28.1%
illicit drug abuse/dependence 17.2%
PGs with a history of substance abuse demonstrate more severe gambling and psychosocial problems than those without a history of substance abuse
(Ladd et al., 2003

Almost 80% complete CBT. No differences between group and individual Raylu 2010
Naltrexone and nalmefene worked in 2 RCTs but not yet approved by BNF.
Laursen 2016: Odds ratio for violence charges was 2.2 ( 1.1-4.5) Odds ratio for drug charges was 3.7 ( 1.7-8)

17
Q

What is the therapeutic use of LSD and psilocybin?

A

Obsessive compulsive disorder (Moreno et al. 06)
Depression (Carhart-Harris et al. 16)
End of life anxiety (Griffiths et al. 16; Ross et al. 16)
Alcohol dependence (Bogenschutz et al. 15)
Tobacco addiction (Johnson et al. 14)
Reduced psychological distress and suicidality – population survey (Hendricks et al. 15)
‘Flashbacks’/HPPD rare (Halpern & Pope, 2003; Carhart-Harris & Nutt, 10)
Prolonged negative psychological reactions are rare (Cohen & Ditman, 1962)
Anxiety/dysphoria in acute state is common (Griffiths et al. 06)
Transient headaches common (Johnson et al. 14)

5-HT2AR agonism, especially in frontal cortex Beliveau 16) which is associated with increased cognitive flexibility and learning and cortical plasticity. Fankel 2002
SSRIs reduce limbic metabolism & amygdala responsivity (Ma 15) but with psilocybin, amygdala increases in response to fear as depression decreases.
Acute cortical entropy predicts positive outcomes and more emotional approach because limbic disinhibition.
Ego and the default mode network and parahippocampal-posterior cingulate cortex coupling all decrease and the global network increases. -> regression?
Amygdala CBF decreased as depression decreased.

Disturbed high-level subjective constancy
‘Self’ as a subjective-constant, ego dissolution
Disconnection -> reconnection, avoidance -> acceptance, patience and emotional blunting (limbic) to prepare for change and then openness, creativity and learning (cortex) to overcome previous traumatic experiences. BUT also more suggestible (Carhart-Harris 2015)

18
Q

How does smoking relate to the other conditions in terms of addiction?

A

Wilson 2014: The key finding was that deprived smokers who exhibited the weakest response to rewards (i.e., monetary gains) in the ventral striatum were least willing to refrain from smoking for monetary reinforcement.

19
Q

What are the principles of CBT?

A

CBT is a focused psychotherapy derived from a range of sources including learning theory and cognitive psychology research.
CBT aims to alleviate emotional distress by identifying and correcting faulty thinking, especially irrational beliefs about oneself, others and the world in general, eg. if an alcohol addict, put them in situation where they socialise while sober.
3 factors affect vulnerability:
Genetic loading via polymorphisims (e.g. DRD4 for addiction /impulsivity; 5HTT –serotonin transporter gene-leading to neurobiological vulnerability, though findings inconsistent heritability estimates 30%-70%)
Exposure to adversity such as separation or emotional deprivation in childhood.
Subsequent exposure to negative life events (the “critical” or activating event) where/when substances are accessible or available
Antecedents, Behaviours, Consequences
Cues can be processed automatically but behaviours must have controlled processing with attention.
Motivation and engagement, Manage impulsivity, Manage negative emotions, Maintain change (relapse prevention)
Identify high risk stimuli: internal and external
Correct maladaptive beliefs about substances e.g “people would ridicule me if I did not drink at the party”
Identify the involvement of early maladaptive schemas e.g. defectiveness or unloveability as contexts for misuse
Negative automatic thoughts: “Who cares if I drink?”
Coping with craving: e.g. “delay and distraction”
Rationalisations “ permission giving beliefs” e.g. “I deserve one…”
Circumscribing lapses/slips: One swallow doesn’t make a summer!”
Update on developments since previous encounter, with particular emphasis on any expression of addictive behaviour, negative mood states and current concerns.
Setting the agenda, possibly asking the client to specify the priorities if the list of concerns or problematic issues is extensive. Specifying the stage of CHANGE (one of the 4Ms) of treatment e.g. managing impulses, managing mood maintaining change
Reviewing any between session assignments homework
Introducing and then elaborating on the primary topic of the session e.g. coping with impulses
Negotiating homework for coming week e.g. an implementation strategy or a behavioural experiment
Summary and feedback
Schedule next appointment, reinforcing the importance of attendance even if the therapeutic objectives are met by the homework is not accomplished.
Motivational interviewing:
Opening strategy, ask about lifestyle, stresses and problem behaviour, A typical day, The good things and the less good things about the current drug use, Current concerns, Elicit self-motivational statements and listen with accurate empathy, Roll with resistance: “you’re not sure you want to make a commitment to quit today”
Point out discrepancies: “ You’re not sure your drinking is a big problem, but people who care about you seem to be concerned”
Clarify free choice: “In the end, its down to you to make the decision….”
Ask: How important/ready/confident are you on a scale of 0-10? Then “Why not lower/higher …? ”
Identify and challenge negative thoughts about change
Stimulus Control, Implementation intentions, Identify alternative rewards, Self monitoring, Distance /de- centre / mindfulness meditation, Challenge expectancies and implicit cognitions via behavioural experiments, Support self-efficacy, Goal specificity
Identify and rehearse coping strategies e.g. drink refusal skills; distraction; challenging your thoughts ; review negative consequences focus on benefits of restraint; talk to supportive friends or associates on programme
Educate about emotions
Antecedent cognitive appraisals
- Probability errors
- Catastrophising
Prevention of emotional avoidance
- Behavioural avoidance e.g . avoiding eye contact
- Cognitive avoidance e.g. thought suppression , rumination
- Safety signals e.g. Carrying a bottle of water or a pill
Modification of emotionally driven behaviours
- Hypervigilance
- Health anxiety behaviours

20
Q

What is contingency management?

A

Conditioning in which an operant (voluntary) response is brought under stimulus control by virtue of presenting reinforcement contingent upon the occurrence of the operant response/the basic process by which an individual’s behaviour is shaped by reinforcement

Simple incentive: Adherence to one-off intervention, irreversible benefit

Complex incentive: to promote sustained behaviour change as mechanism for health benefit

Target positive behaviour consistent with treatment goals under voluntary control which can be readily and regularly measured (eg. attendance, urine samples for drugs) and
then develop a reinforcement schedule that promotes this which is recovery-appropriate and gives them some choice (praise and food token, not money which may be spent on drugs, raffles are less effective than vouchers, clinic privileges (eg. flexibility about methadone which can be revoked if problems)) and is frequent to maintain a good response (often difficult to achieve in clinic setting) and provide simple, clear information explaining procedures to subject (establish a clear relationship between target behaviour and reinforcement) and
then measure whether the target behaviour is achieved and provide or withhold reinforcement depending on whether the behaviour has been achieved.
Even if the target behaviour was withheld, maintain neutral, not punitive, and be positive and empathetic when target behaviour is achieved. Show clients can get “back on track” quickly and easily.
Rewards can escalate in value, especially as rewards need to compete with the behaviour of the intervention targets and achieving abstinence is more difficult than achieving engagement.

21
Q

Give some examples of contingency management:

A

Can use financial incentives or reputational incentives or a mix of both, eg. public reporting (managers and clinicians perceive they are being monitored), public ranking of performance + apportioned blame (performance league tables - behavioural economics suggest people are more responsive to loss aversion than possibility of gain so hospital/doctor tries to improve performance) / modest financial incentives for good relative performance (NHS hospitals assessed annually against indicators, eg. waiting time, cleanliness, etc. and awareded 0-3 stars, and then management given more autonomy or dismissed based on star rating) or pure financial incentives for predefined improvements against specific quality criteria (Pay for Performance (P4P) in eg. GP contract (2004) made GP income dependent on performance against 146 indicators of clinical quality, eg. annual tests for diabetics, flu vaccinations for older pts, cancer screening programmes, up to 20% GP budget. Probably improved quality of care because good response but “gaming” as excluding pts who miss targets, encourage focus on healthier pts who will hit targets and away from sicker/less compliant pts. More aggressive, frequent monitoring may add to costs. Shouldn’t need money to do these things anyway)

Smoking cessation in pregnant women in Essex (£20 food voucher after 1 week, £40 after 4 weeks and £40 at 1 year) and children in Brighton and Hove (£15 for 28 day cessation)
Psychotic patients in East London - £5-£15 per injection
Overweight residents in Kent - £70-£425 for achieving target weight + more Marteau 2009

22
Q

What is the evidence for contingency management?

A

Edward Thorndike: Law of Effect - successful responses producing satisfying consequences were stamped in by experience and occurred more frequently than unsuccessful responses with annoying consequences which were stamped out and occurred less frequently
Skinner: Theory of operant conditioning - identified different form of reinforcement that increase or decrease the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated - positive increases behaviour by providing a reward, negative increases a behaviour by removing an aversive stimulus (less intense supervision if target behaviour attained) and punishment decreases behaviour by administering aversive stimulus or removing a desirable stimulus (eg. removing privilege), extinction is decreasing behaviour by not rewarding it. Delayed rewards are less likely to change behaviour and even if behaviour is damaging in long term, if immediate reward then more likely to encourage the behaviour so contingency management tries to tip the balance back to healthy behaviours in present.

Significantly more effective in retaining cocaine users in treatment than counselling alone Higgins 1994
Methadone maintenance - cost effective and participants remain abstinent <6 months (evidence for >6 months is lacking), large, consistent effect >20 trials. Peirce 2006 - reduced stimulant use in methadone maintenance patients if positive reinforcement
Weaver - PRAISE trial - heroin abstinence
2x rate TB test/Hep B vaccination Seal 2003 (£5-10 vouchers) and 3x better return rate at 6 months
Weaver 2014 - OR = 12.1 for fixed vs control, 13.9 for escalating vs control (% who complete <28 days), if look at <3 months then OR = 3.4 and 4.2 for fixed and escalating vs controls. Full adherence to all appointments (greater efficiency in NHS resources) OR = 9.9 and 16.7, 3.7% appointments where protocol violation (uncommon) therefore CM schedules are generally understood and accepted by staff and generally teams became more positive after delivering CM (attitudes do vary within teams), pts happy with CM and often keyworkers relationship improves, patients mostly report using vouchers for food and treats, sometimes alcohol/tobacco but no evidence of sold/used to acquire illicit drugs - cost-effective - Rafia 2016 - for every 1,000 offered vaccine + CM, 18 additional lifetime infections may be prevented.
Opiate detox +/- contingency management - more likely to achieve abstinence
Priebe 2013 - depot injections given during 12 month intervention period, no significant change in clinician rated clinical improvement or inpatient admission but slightly higher self-reported quality of life
2007 NICE - contingency management recommended for detoxification and psychosocial interventions.

BUT limited evidence on outcomes after withdrawal of reinforcement and compliance in routine practice

23
Q

What are some ethical arguments against contingency management?

A

Bribery - paying people to act against their wishes
Coercion - compel people to behave using threats
Paternalistic - undermines individual autonomy
Unfair to people who do behaviour
Waste of money - many competing demands - But drug misuse costs £11.9bn p/a to society

24
Q

Which parts of the brain are activated in response to food stimuli?
How is food addiction similar to drug addictions?

A

Orbitofrontal cortex* (appetising>bland food, Beaver 2006, obese viewing high calorie food Stockel 2008, Change in OFC activation correlates with change in appeal between nutritional states, Goldstone 2009), VTA, NAcc, amygdala, anterior insula, caudate - Goldstone shows people who have starved are more likely to favour high energy foods
Some similarities between food and drug addiction - distress and dysphoria when reducing intake (but not quite withdrawal), persistent desire for food, difficulties in controlling amounts of food eaten, social isolation from stigma of obesity, overeating maintained despite knowledge of adverse physical and psychological consequences, tolerance? (More food for same satiety… depends on type of food, etc. Ziauddeen 2012

First of all, how should you measure obesity? BMI? Lean body mass? Resting body expenditure?
No difference in hunger ratings or high calorie food appeal (no correlation between high calorie food and OFC signalling) or external eating (Increased OFC Response to Food Pictures) or reward sensitivity questionnaires BUT
lower mood in obesity + greater emotional eating in overweight/obese and higher dietary restraint in obesity
Dietary restraint - lower OFC, amygdala and caudate response during evaluation high energy foods
Negative correlation with OFC activation during evaluation of low energy foods (weakly)
Less weight loss if: Higher N Accumbens & Insula response (Murdaugh 2012) and greater weight gain if less caudate response (Stice 2008)

Reduced D2/D3 binding (with Raclopride) Volkow 2001 but only significant in dorsal caudate and dorsal putamen Small 2003
Fallypride did show positive correlation with BMI
Naltrexone reduced chocolate craving in small sample, anterior cingulate signalling - Murray 2014
Naltrexone-Bupropion Treatment for Obesity - Wang 2014 - hippocampus, posterior insula, anterior cingulate, superior parietal
Greater OFC activation to food cues vs. non-BED overweight

Anticipation of monetary reward - increased activation of striatum, amygdala, ant. insula, sup. parietal lobe, medial temporal gyrus
In cocaine & cannabis, alcoholics, at risk of alcoholism: ventral striatum, caudate, putamen, amygdala van Holst 2014
Obesity: ­ventral striatal, amygdala, and medial PFC response to anticipatory monetary reward Balodis 2013
Food intake reduces brain response to unpleasant images Goldstone

25
Q

What hormones are involved in food addiction?

A

Ghrelin increases DA in NAcc (Jerlhag 2007)
Ghrelin mimics fasting to increase brain hedonic responses to food Goldstone and increases hippocampus activation 2014
Ghrelin promotes dendritic spine synapse formation and generation of long term potentiation in hippocampus of rodents Diano 2006
Ghrelin increases food intake when given in hippocampus and improves memory tetention in rates Carlini 2004
GLP-1 R activation (eg. exenatide) reduces calorie intake in all van Bloemendaal 2014 - insula, amygdala, OFC, putamen
PYY and GLP-1 suppress food intake and brain reward system activation to food cues (De Silva 2011)
Octreotide attenuates postprandial rise in anorexigenic gut hormones after bariatric surgery - Goldstone 2016 - and increases anticipatory food reward (enjoy food more)

26
Q

Describe some of the effects of surgery on appetite and weight loss:

A

Reduced sugar intake after gastric bypass compared to gastric banding, more fruit and veg too Olbers 2006 Less OFC and amygdala activation after gastric bypass than banding, more PYY, GLP-1, total bile acids in bypass than banding - Scholtz 2014 - but greater dumping in bypass than banding
Reduced hunger and appeal of high energy foods in both Scholtz 2014