Module 2: Lecture 1 Flashcards
IOM Report, “The Future of Public Health” (1998), Mission of Public Health:
“fulfilling society’s interest in assuring conditions in which people can be healthy”
Early Public Health Efforts Included
improved housing, trade unions, abolition of child labor, maternal & child health, temperance (reduce alcohol consumption)
- closely tied to social reform movement
Public Health as Social Justice
minimal levels of income, housing, employment, education, health care should be fundamental rights for everyone
Idea of Public Health as a Leader in Social Justice is Resisted by Conservative Thinkers
public health should focus only on controlling infectious diseases and as a safety net to provide medical care to those in dire need
America as a Market-Oriented Society (Market Justice)
- individualism prevails
- medical care for all is a “socialist ideal”
Americans Oppose Being Told What to do
- resist government restrictions on behavior even if intent is protection
- where does individual responsibility & choice end?
- CONCEPT: individual liberties- individual power making & choice
Social Justice
- minimal levels of income, housing, employment, education, health care should be fundamental rights for everyone
- government has an obligation to provide healthy conditions for societal members who are unable or unwilling to provide these conditions for themselves
- attacked as a “socialist” perspective
Market Justice
- conservative perspectives
- individual responsibility
- minimum responsibility to common good
- public health should focus only on controlling infectious diseases and as a safety net to provide medical care to those in dire need
- Paternalism: should we be told what to do (e.g. guns, soda & tobacco taxes etc.)
Primary Areas of Debate: Economic Impact (Negative)
industries resist public health measures
- landlords and building codes, polluters and environmental regulation; tobacco- income for many people in the South
- short term costs for long-term benefits (environment)
Usually, Those who pay for a Public Health Measure are not the ones who Benefit
- short term rewards vs long term benefits of regulations
- what % of medical expenditures go towards public health?
Primary Areas of Debate: Libertarian Perspective
- laws are okay only to restrict harm to others (assault, murder, etc.); “tyranny” if laws to restrict harm to themselves
- it is okay to outlaw some activities but not others:
- activities that only harm the individual (e.g. soda, drug use, alcohol use, tobacco use when alone) etc…are permissible
- when harm is incurred to others some libertarians will agree that intervention is needed
Libertarian Point of View (John Stuart Mill)
“the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.”
- PATERNALISM: why can YOU tell ME what to do with/to MYSELF?
Moral/Ethical Perspectives
some behaviors are “immoral” and because of this:
- certain of public health activities/initiatives should be carried out
- funding should be allocated in certain ways
- punishment/incentives against certain behaviors
Examples of Moral/Ethical Perspectives
- HIV/AIDS- notion that providing condoms/sexual education etc…promotes promiscuity (abstinence only)
- Drug Use- should we practice harm reduction (clean needles for heroin use)? argument that this promotes drug use; penal system for drug users…not rehab focused
- Funding Allocation for Research- less funding is allocated to studying “immoral” health issues- HIV/AIDS
Global (International) Public Health Defined as
the application of the principles of public health to health problems and challenges that affect low-and middle income countries and to the complex array of global and local forces that influence them
- Crosses International Borders