Module 10 Data: HF & HTN Flashcards
Please take special notice of the terms that are used. They will be critical to understanding this condition and ensure the patient is on all appropriate medications.
Heart Failure (Note the term congestive heart failure is not used because not all heart failure is associated with congestive symptoms and thus the need for diuretics is only where congestive symptoms are present)
- Left sided vs Right sided
- NYHA functional classification
- Class I No limitation of physical activity
- Class II Slight limitation of physical activity
- Class III Marked limitation of physical activity
- Class IV Unable to carry on any physical activity w/o discomfort
- As you can see from the descriptions, this classification system is highly subjective .. with a patient able to move back and forth between stages based on degree of limitations (and how well they are being managed).
-
ACC/AHA classification
- Stage A –High risk; no structural abnormalities
- Stage B –Structural abnormalities; no symptoms
- Stage C –Structural abnormalities; current or previous symptoms
- Stage D –End stage symptoms refractory to treatment
- Unlike NYHA’s classification, a patient can NOT move back to an earlier stage. You can also see that this system promotes identification and screening of individuals at risk.
-
Please note medications that prevent or improve clinical symptoms (morbidity) vs those that slow progression and improve survival (mortality / outcomes)
o When considering certain classes of medication, select agents are approved OR are dosed to a specific target dose
Examples
Beta blockers - All patients with stable NYHA Class II or III HF due to LV dysfunction OR ACC/AHA Stage B if s/p MI or asymptomatic LVH or EF < 40%) should receive a beta-blocker (unless not tolerated).. carvedilol, metoprolol extended/controlled release and bisoprolol are the only beta blockers that should be used in HF (CIBIS II, MERIT HF trial, COPERNICUS trial) …titrated to “target doses” if possible
Beta blockers may reduce mortality in stable patients with class II and III heart failure and possibly class IV heart failure
-
- Please note medications that prevent or improve clinical symptoms (morbidity) vs those that slow progression and improve survival (mortality / outcomes)
o When considering certain classes of medication, select agents are approved OR are dosed to a specific target dose
Examples
ACEIs /ARBs - ALL patients with left ventricular dysfunction (HFrEF) and current or prior symptoms should receive an ACEI (unless contraindicated or patient is intolerant) .. titrated to “target doses” if possible
slow progression, decrease mortality as well as the combined risk of death and hospitalizations
-
- Please note medications that prevent or improve clinical symptoms (morbidity) vs those that slow progression and improve survival (mortality / outcomes)
o When considering certain classes of medication, select agents are approved OR are dosed to a specific target dose
Examples
Diuretics - for patients with congestive symptoms .. they DO NOT provide any mortality benefit
NOTE term: Diuretic resistance- described below
-
Other interventions to review for HF include ARNIs, MRAs, ISDN/Hydralazine, Digoxin, SGLT2Is
-
- –2/3 of cases of HF attributable to CHD -Reduction in muscle mass - ♯1 cause, s/p MI where heart tissue dies (hypokinetic). The › the infarcted, area the › degree of HF (Table 6-1, 6-3)
o Although statins can not be recommended on the diagnosis of HF alone, ASCVD is typically part of the clinical picture …. Thus virtually ALL patients with HF should be on a statin 2/2 to ASCVD
-
- Definition of HF: structural or functional change that impairs the hearts ability to provide enough CO to support metabolic function
o o Congestion is not a necessary component of HF
o o Left-sided failure - Blood not effectively pumped from the left ventricle to the peripheral circulation
o o Right-sided failure - Blood not effectively pumped from the right ventricle into the lungs
-
- Each of the classification schemes are used in various clinical venues. Each have their own unique advantages and disadvantages
o o NYHA
o o ACA/AHA
See Above
-
- Diuretics - Reduce symptoms associated with fluid retention (pulmonary / peripheral edema), improve exercise tolerance.
o No Fluid overload, NO need for additional or aggressive diuresis. Note, that in some patients the initiation of beta-blockers can result in edema, thus those with current or recent history of edema should have a diuretic on board
o Caution: CO output is partially being maintained by volume and high filling pressures. Excessive diuresis may compromise CO
-
- Loop diuretics (eg. torsemide, furosemide) DOC in HF.
o § ADR’s –electrolytes (Na, K, Mg, Ca wasting), ototoxicity
Hypokalemia augmented by ↑ [aldosterone] in HF as part of a compensatory mechanism
This (hypokalemia) may increase the potential for digoxin toxicity (if used)
Watch your labs
Additional potassium supplementation may be necessary
Recall that MRAs should not be thought of as a potassium sparing diuretic in the context of heart failure and thiazide are generally not effective in hear failure (and CrCl < 30ml /min) and are more suited for use in HTN.
What agents used in HF may offset the need for K replacement and is a reason monitoring is so important?
ACEI/ARB, ARNIs, aldosterone antagonists (all of these increase [K]
-
o Goals of reducing edema and improving symptoms can be generally be achieved with a loop diuretic alone.
o Greater diuretic capabilities and they retain their efficacy with decreased renal function
o Appropriate use of diuretics is key to the success of other drugs used for HF
too little diuretic: diminish patients response to ACEI’s
too much diuretic: volume contraction, increases risk of hypotension and renal insufficiency
o These agents have no effect on disease progression or mortality
-
o Thiazides - Utilization in HF less than loops as a single agent, but as combination therapy with loops for synergistic effect with demonstrated diuretic resistance
§ Note: Thiazides are usually insufficient in dealing with edema and volume overload in patients with HF (except in maybe very early disease). In fact, even increasing doses has little benefit in improving diuresis . In addition, they are NOT effective with a CrCl < 30ml/min. Discontinue and replace with a loop diuretic in symptoms of edema volume overload in HF
§ Note: Ocassionally, some thiazides (metolazone) may be used in combination with loops for their [K] sparing properties
-
o § Diuretic Resistance - poor response to a diuretic (loop) / edema refractory to loop diuretics that have been optomized
Overcoming diuretic resistance
increase CO to increase RBF and delivery of drug to nephron
vasodilators – reverse the widespread vasoconstriction in HF, including that of the renal vasculature which is restricting GFR
if on a loop, increase freq. / dose
if insufficient response – additional agents added on to get sequential response (ex optomized loop + metolazone or thiazide)
-
- Mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) - in one respect, they can be thought of a potassium sparing diuretic, however in HF the non-renal effects (↑ BR sensitivity ,↓ LVH, ↓/stop myocardial / vascular fibrosis) may outweigh the renal effects of these agents and play an important role in decrease morbidity and mortality
o spironolactone, eplerenone
-
- Positive (+) inotropes improve the symptoms of HF by moving patients to a higher ventricular function curve, that is, greater CO for a given filling pressure (or preload or PCWP)because of greater contractile force
o o Digoxin
-
- Vasodilators - improve the symptoms of HF by moving patients to a higher ventricular function curve and by reducing filling pressures
o o ACEI / ARB/ ARNI
o o ISDN / NTG – (venodilators )Reduces filling pressures and pulmonary congestion
o o Hydralazine - arterial dilator
§ Use combination regimen w/ ISDN in certain populations
-
- Impact of dilators on survival / mortality
o ACEIs / ARBs – improve survival, decrease mortality - neprilysin inhibitor - (aka ARNI - angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor)
o o Neprilysin is a neutral endopeptidase that degrades several endogenous vasoactive peptides including natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and adrenomedullin
o o Inhibition of neprilysin increases levels of these peptides and counters neurohormonal over activation that contributes to vasoconstriction, sodium retention, and maladaptive remodeling
o o In combination with valsartan - Chronic HF class II-IV
§ Clinical benefits: Decrease mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and risk for worsening heart failure compared to enalapril in patients with symptomatic heart failure and ejection fraction ≤ 40%.
§ For patients with NYHA class II to IV HFrEF (LVEF ≤40 percent) with no improvement in NYHA functional class or worsening symptoms on optimally titrated ACE inhibitor (or ARB), beta blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, and diuretics
-
o o Guidelines - In patients with chronic symptomatic HFr EF NYHA class II or III who tolerate an ACE inhibitor or ARB, replacement by an ARNI is recommended to further reduce morbidity and mortality
Note: this is a strong recommendation, but based on moderate (vs high) level of evidence
-
- Hydralazine + ISDN – improve survival, decrease mortality
- Alpa-1 antagonist – no effect
- CCB (verapamil, diltiazem) - increase mortality ( amlodipine, felodipine) - no change
-
Beta blockers - use may seem contradictory. Why ?
* Beneficial effects in stable angina:
o Block the effects of high [NEPI] and other sympathetic NT
o Decrease ventricular arrhythmias (sudden cardiac death)
o Decrease cardiac hypertrophy (remodeling) and cardiac cell death (apoptosis)
o Decrease vasoconstriction and heart rate
o Decrease mortality
* o Start very low, titrated very slow (too fast = decompensation)
* o Caution NYHA III IV – may further impair contractility
-
Emerging therapies:
* HCN channel blocker (Ivabradine)- Indicated to decrease risk of hospitalization for worsening HF in patients with stable, symptomatic (NYHA class II-III) chronic heart failure with EF ≤ 35%, who are in sinus rhythm with resting heart rate ≥ 70 BPM and either are on guideline directed evidence based therapy, including maximally tolerated doses of beta blockers or have a contraindication to beta-blocker use.
* SGLT2Is reduces risk of worsening heart failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, regardless of presence of diabetes
-
- Vericiguat - is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization following a hospitalization for HF or need for outpatient IV diuretics, in adults with symptomatic chronic HF and ejection fraction less than 45%.
o Patients with age less than 75 years, chronic renal insufficiency, LV ejection fraction <45%, and NYHA functional class III or IV appear to receive further benefit. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the role of vericiguat amongst available evidence-based therapies and target populations.
o Achieving the “quintuple therapy” of RAAS inhibition (ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA), beta blocker, SGLTi, and an sGC modulator could be the ideal regimen, but it remains to be seen how one accomplishes this through the ritual of outpatient medication titration and adherence. - Consider goals of therapy including prevention and management of underlying disorders
-
- ACE (or ARB) - By blocking ACE, we are decreasing production of ANG II and aldosterone and attenuating the deleterious effects of neurohormones
o Decreased hospitalization (approximately 30%), Symptom improvement (↓ morbidity), Improved clinical status (Improved EF), Less diuretic required, Improve exercise tolerance AND decrease mortality regardless of race, age or gender.
All patients with LV dysfunction (regardless of NYHA classification) should receive an ACE I (unless intolerant) - Benefits are observed in mild, moderate or severe HF with benefits in days and symptomatic improvement after several weeks
Who should NOT receive an ACEI
Patients who have experienced angioedema (allergic reaction)
Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
Bilateral renal arterial stenosis
Caution in : SBP < 80 mmHg ; SCr > 3mg/dl ; K > 5 mEq/L
Note: renal dysfunction should not be a contraindication to ACE I use in these patients. These patients should just be monitored closely for development of ARF and/or hyperkalemia
o These agents are doses to a “target dose” if possible. Start low, go slow titrating every few weeks to decrease the risk of orthostasis (“first dose phenomenon”)
o Monitoring should include K, SCr, BUN, BP, dry cough
-
o Although you do not need to memorize doses, you must know that they are dosed to a target dose (if possible)
ACEi and ARBs
-
- ARBs are considered a reasonable alternative to a patient intolerant of ACEI or if they are already taking an ARB it is reasonable to continue
o There is NO reason to choose and ARB over an ACEI in the absence of ACEI intolerances (listed below)
E.g. Dry Cough
E.g. Angioedema
o Dosing is to a TARGET DOSE if possible. Start low, go slow titrating every few weeks because … same reason as ACEIs
o Monitoring should include K, SCr, BUN, BP
-
o Routine combined use of an ACE inhibitor ARB is potentially harmful
o Although you do not need to memorize doses, you must know that they are dosed to a target dose (if possible)
* ARNIs - Sacubitril /Valsartan - Neprilysin is a neutral endopeptidase that degrades several endogenous vasoactive peptides including natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and adrenomedullin. Inhibition of neprilysin (Sacubitril) increases levels of these peptides and counters neurohormonal over activation that contributes to vasoconstriction, sodium retention, and maladaptive remodeling
o Although you do not need to memorize doses, you must know that they are dosed to a target dose (if possible)
-
o ACC /AHA 2016: In patients with chronic symptomatic HFrEF NYHA class II or III who tolerate an ACE inhibitor or ARB, replacement by an ARNI is recommended to further reduce morbidity and mortality
-
o ESC / SIGN: sacubitril/valsartan recommended instead of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (unless contraindicated) in patients with New York Heart Association class II-III heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% with ongoing symptoms of heart failure despite optimal treatment
o Starting dose is 49/51 mg twice daily. After two to four weeks, the dose is doubled to the target maintenance dose of 97/103 twice daily, as tolerated by the patient.
o Monitoring similar to ACEI / ARB
-
- Beta blockers
o Best studied beta blockers in HF (and only ones approved) are carvedilol, metoprolol succinate extended/controlled release (NOT metoprolol tartarate) and bisoprolol. If a patient is on another BB, it must be changed (gradually) to one of the three with evidence in HF
-
o Benefits are in addition to those achieved with ACEIs - Decrease mortality ( 35% decrease), Decrease hospitalizations, Symptom improvement (decrease morbidity), Improved clinical status ( ↑EF, ↓tachyarrhythmias), Slowed disease progression (, ↓ remodeling, ↓ apoptosis) regardless of race, age or gender.
-
o All patients with (hemodynamically) stable NYHA Class II or III (and possibly Class IV) HF due to LV dysfunction should receive a beta-blocker (unless not tolerated) OR ACC/AHA stage B if s/p MI or asymptomatic LVH or EF < 40%
-
o o Who should not receive a BB
§ Volume overload
§ Symptomatic bradycardia
§ ACTIVE NYHA II or III (or IV) until stable
§ Acute decompensation
§ Advanced heart block
-
o Initiation can begin when patient is stable / euvolemic. Dosing is to a TARGET DOSE if possible. Start low, go slow . Too aggressive increase may result in decompensation. Should not be prescribed without a diuretic in patients with current or recent history of fluid retention
Initial doses - bisoprolol 1.25 mg qd, carvedilol 3.125 bid, carvedilol CR 10mg qd, metoprolol succinate CR/XL 12.5 -25 mg qd
Target doses (if you can get there) - Bisoprolol 10 mg qd, carvedilol 25 mg bid, carvedilol CR 80mg qd, metoprolol XL 200 mg qd
Although you do not need to memorize doses, you must know that they are dosed to a target dose (if possible)
-
Monitoring should include HR, BP
§ If hypotension alone is problematic, decrease dose of ACEI ARB / ARNI. Higher BB doses are associated with greater mortality reductions
§ If Edema is problematic - increase the diuretic
§ Fatigue / weakness - should resolve spontaneously in a few weeks
patients need to be aware of the benefits of beta blockers and that beta blocker therapy may make them feel worse during initiation of therapy. Symptom improvement may not be apparent for several months
-
- Beta blockers
o Best studied beta blockers in HF (and only ones approved) are carvedilol, metoprolol succinate extended/controlled release (NOT metoprolol tartarate) and bisoprolol. If a patient is on another BB, it must be changed (gradually) to one of the three with evidence in HF - o Benefits are in addition to those achieved with ACEIs - Decrease mortality ( 35% decrease), Decrease hospitalizations, Symptom improvement (decrease morbidity), Improved clinical status ( ↑EF, ↓tachyarrhythmias), Slowed disease progression (, ↓ remodeling, ↓ apoptosis) regardless of race, age or gender.
o All patients with (hemodynamically) stable NYHA Class II or III (and possibly Class IV) HF due to LV dysfunction should receive a beta-blocker (unless not tolerated) OR ACC/AHA stage B if s/p MI or asymptomatic LVH or EF < 40% - o o Who should not receive a BB
§ Volume overload
§ Symptomatic bradycardia
§ ACTIVE NYHA II or III (or IV) until stable
§ Acute decompensation
§ Advanced heart block - o Initiation can begin when patient is stable / euvolemic. Dosing is to a TARGET DOSE if possible. Start low, go slow . Too aggressive increase may result in decompensation. Should not be prescribed without a diuretic in patients with current or recent history of fluid retention
Initial doses - bisoprolol 1.25 mg qd, carvedilol 3.125 bid, carvedilol CR 10mg qd, metoprolol succinate CR/XL 12.5 -25 mg qd
Target doses (if you can get there) - Bisoprolol 10 mg qd, carvedilol 25 mg bid, carvedilol CR 80mg qd, metoprolol XL 200 mg qd
Although you do not need to memorize doses, you must know that they are dosed to a target dose (if possible) - o o Monitoring should include HR, BP
§ If hypotension alone is problematic, decrease dose of ACEI ARB / ARNI. Higher BB doses are associated with greater mortality reductions
§ If Edema is problematic - increase the diuretic
§ Fatigue / weakness - should resolve spontaneously in a few weeks
patients need to be aware of the benefits of beta blockers and that beta blocker therapy may make them feel worse during initiation of therapy. Symptom improvement may not be apparent for several months
-
- Diuretics
o o Indicated in patients with fluid retention / congestive signs and symptoms. No congestive symptoms, no diuretic!
§ Consider if there Are there “other” causes of edema (eg. CCBs (amlodipine), NSAIDs, corticosteroids, etc) and remove these causes first (if possible) - o o Benefits
§ Short term :↓JVD, ↓pulmonary congestion, ↓ peripheral edema
§ Intermediate term: Decrease daily symptoms, Increase exercise tolerance
NO MORTALITY BENEFITS… Should be combined with ACEi, BB, MRA
o Are thiazide diuretics effective for HF? Only for early, mild HF. Higher doses are rarely effective in improving s/sx of congestion / volume overload when used as monotherapy
o Loop diuretics are preferred in HF because of greater diuretic capabilities and they retain their efficacy with decreased renal function
Initiate therapy with low doses of diuretic (i.e. furosemide 20-40 mg/day) and increase dose until patient maintains stable dry weight without dyspnea
§ Adjustments Based on symptomatic improvements and body weights (sensitive marker or fluid retention and loss)
Monitoring - weights and electrolytes (see above)
-
- Aldosterone antagonist - are used because Aldosterone is a neurohormone that plays a role in sodium and water retention and ventricular remodeling (collagen deposition and cardiac fibrosis)
o Recommended in class II-IV (Stage C) patients with LVEF ≤ 35% to reduce morbidity and mortality unless a CI exists. Patients with class II should have a history of CV hospitalization or elevated BNP levels or to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients s/p MI when they have LVEF <40% with symptoms of HF or LVEF <40% and diabetes
-
o Benefits : Decrease all cause mortality (30%), Decrease hospitalization (35%), Improved symptoms
o Should be added to ACEi (or ARB) and β blocker therapy as long as:
§ SCr should be less than 2.5mg/dl ♂ , 2.0 ♀ and GFR > 30 ml/min
§ K should be < 5.0 mEq/L
o Monitoring - K, SCr, BUN, gynecomastea (w/ sprionolactone)
Aldosterone antagonist
-
- Digoxin - Positive inotropic effect identified in the 1920’s
o o Digoxin produces symptomatic benefits
o o Target serum concentration when treating patients with HF
o o Place in therapy
Early in therapy for patients with HF and atrial fibrillation to help control ventricular response
For HF patients in normal sinus rhythm, used with other standard HF therapies (ACEI’s, beta-blockers, diuretics) in patients with persistant symptoms despite optimal therapy
o o Monitoring / signs of toxicity .. NTI
digoxin levels
–Visual – blurred vision, blue-green / yellow halos
GI – N/V anorexia abdominal pain
CNS - fatigue / dizziness / delirium / confusion / CTZ stimulation
-
Hydralazine / ISDN
§ Recommended to reduce morbidity and mortality for patients self-described as African Americans with NYHA class III–IV HFrEF receiving optimal therapy with ACE inhibitors and beta blockers OR to reduce morbidity or mortality in patients with current or prior symptomatic HFrEF who cannot be given an ACE inhibitor or ARB because of drug intolerance, hypotension, or renal insufficiency
§ Benefits: Decreased mortality (43%), decreased hospitalization (39%)
§ Monitoring - BP, dizsiness
-
o Ivabradine - Within the SA node, ivabradine selectively blocks the HCN channel, inhibits the If current, and lowers heart rate
Ivabradine can be beneficial to reduce HF hospitalization for patients with symptomatic (NYHA class II-III) stable chronic HFrEF (LVEF ≤35%) who are receiving GDEM, including a beta blocker at maximum tolerated dose, and who are in sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 70 bpm or greater at rest
Monitoring - Heart rate and cardiac rhythem
-
o SGLT2Is
cardiovascular benefits in patients with HFrEF were seen in patients previously treated with current evidence‐based therapies (e.g. ACE inhibitors, β‐blockers, ARBs).
-
Statins
§ Not recommended solely on the basis of HF diagnosis
2/3 of the cases of HF are caused by CHD and the #1 cause being damaged myocardium s/p MI. CHD and MI are considered to be clinical ASCVD which IS an indication for statins, regardless of baseline LDL
-
Omega – 3 fatty acids
§ Reasonable adjunct therapy in NYHA II-IV symptoms and HFrEF or HFpEF to reduce mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations
-
Anticoagulation
§ For patients with established coronary artery disease, (not solely on the basis of HF), antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 75 to 100 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily.
§ Recommended in HF with permanent / persistent / paroxysmal aFib with an additional risk factor for stroke, (not solely on the basis of HF), with no preference on agent
-
The following was part of a classmates post and you may find useful:
Mnemonic based on evidence-based research for treatment of systolic heart failure. B A N D A I D (2) stands for beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, nitrate-hydralazine (or potentially neprilysin inhibitor), diuretics, aldosterone antagonist, ivabradine (selective sinus node inhibitor), devices (automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy or both) and digoxin (Chia, Fulcher & Keech, 2016).
-
-