Module 1 Lecture 6: Synaptogenesis Flashcards
starburst amacrine function
detecting direction of motion
characteristics of fly Dscam1isoforms
- homophilic
- 4 alternatively spliced exons; 3 are for the ectodomain
- 19008 ectodomain isoforms possible
what happens if dendritic arborization neurons don’t have Dscam1
spread out process of dendritic arborization (da) neurons collapse and cross over
is Dscam1 splicing selective?
no, nearly random
how is the Dscam1 identity developed
each neuron expresses several to a few tens of different isoforms
what does homophilic binding result in in Dscam1
repulsion
how is self-avoidance designed in Dscam1
each neuron can only bind its own set of Dscam1 isoforms
what results from reduced Dscam1 diversity (by overexpressing 1 isoform)
2 different da neurons that normally ignore each other now avoid crossing
how is ectodomain diversity in vertebrate Protocadherin clusters achieved
through alternative transcription start sites (contrast to fly Dscam1)
- each isoform is homophilic
function of domains EC2 and EC3 in Protocadherin clusters
mediate the specificity of homophilic binding
similarities between Protocadherin EC1 and Dscam Ig2
domains have similar folds
the question of synaptic specificity
after having arrived at the correct target area and layer, how do neurons choose the correct synaptic partners from among many contact partners?
example of stringent specificity
C3 neurons in fly visual system contacts both Tm1 and Tm2 neurons but only makes synapses with Tm1
biased specificity example
an On-SAC in the mouse retina has similar amount of contact with N- and V- ooDSGCs but makes more synapses with the V-type
types of synaptic specificity
adhesion, repulsion, elimination, and subcellular localization
first hypothesis for synaptic specificity
sequential: partner choice, then synapse formation
second hypothesis for synaptic specificity
package deal: combination of same cell adhesion molecules on pre- and post-synaptic cell mediate both partner choice and synapse formation
third hypothesis for synaptic specificity
make, then break: non-specific (promiscuous) synapses selectively eliminated after partner choice is made
why are in vitro studies of neurons less relevant to in vivo studies
neurons are synapse-happy and synapse-willing; they will readily make synapses with most sticky surfaces
what happens after neurogenesis and neuronal migration
axon guidance and dendritic arborization
what happens after axon guidance and dendritic arborization
nascent synapse formation
what happens after nascent synapse formation
either mature synapses or synapse elimination
what happens after mature synapses form
synapse elimination
what happens after synapse elimination
nascent synapse formation