Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

POPLHLTH 111 > Module 1: Distribution and Determinants of PopHlth > Flashcards

Module 1: Distribution and Determinants of PopHlth Flashcards

1
Q

What is epidemiology

A

The study of frequency/occurrence of dis-ease (N) in populations (D) over a period of time (T)
ALWAYS starts by describing a population, then count the number of cases of dis-ease that occur in the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dis-ease frequency aka…

A

Dis-ease occurrence
Dis-ease risk
Dis-ease distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why measure the frequency of dis-ease in different populations?

A

If frequency (distribution) of dis-ease is different between 2 populations, this can help identify the causes (determinants)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to calculate frequency of dis-ease

A

[Number of cases of disease] / [Number of people in population]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of a population/group

A

A group of people who share one or more common features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition of dis-ease

A

Narrow: the absence of death, disease, or disability
Broad: the capacity to do what matters most to you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Numerator and denominator

A

Numerator: cases of disease
Denominator: population

Epidemiology = (N/D) / T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define GATE

A

Graphical Approach To Epidemiology

A map of all epidemiological studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is PECOT

A 
The 5 parts of every epidemiological study
Participants/Population
Exposure group
Comparison group
Outcomes
Time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EG and CG

A

Exposure groups and Comparison groups are denominators for calculating dis-ease occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which ‘exposure’ can be chosen as EG or CG?

A

Any, as long as you are clear and state which group is which

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PECOT: Outcomes

A

a & b (or c & d) are numerators

Mostly use those with dis-ease (a & b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Goal of epidemiological studies is…

A

To calculate:
Exposure Group Occurrence (EGO) and
Comparison Group Occurrence (CGO)
Effects (RR and RD) in the whole population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Time arrows

A

Down: Over a period of time
Across: At one point in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Incidence

A

Where the number of dis-ease events that occur are counted forward from a starting point over a period of time

EGO and CGO: incidence measures of occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prevalence

A

Where the number of people with dis-ease are counted at one point in time

EGO and CGO called prevalence measures of occurrence

Less ‘perfect’ measurement - can lose some incidence rain through cure cloud and death drops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When to use incidence or prevalence

A

Incidence: if easy to observe when dis-ease occurs
Prevalence: if hard to observe when dis-ease occurs, we measure IF it has occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Incidence rain drops

A

Each raindrop is a person having a dis-ease event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Prevalence pool

A

If too difficult to measure each raindrop in the drizzle as it falls, measure how much ‘water’ there is in the prevalence pool after the drizzle has fallen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Incidence and prevalence; categorical or numerical measurement?

A

Incidence:
Always involves counting categorical (yes/no) dis-ease EVENTS

Prevalence:
Involves counting categorical dis-ease EVENTS
OR
Measuring numerical dis-ease STATES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Cohort vs cross-sectional studies

A

Cohort - follow over time; can also measure prevalence - either at beginning or any point during the study (e.g. video and taking snapshot)
Cross-sectional - relevant dis-ease events counted at the same time - can only measure prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Video questionnaire

A

Show video of symptom/dis-ease as some diseases may translate differently in different languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Prevalence - time measured ‘backwards’?

A

Measure a period of time, e.g. if someone has had the symptom within the last 3 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

EG and CG - different dis-ease frequencies?

A

Could be due to medicines/drugs

If prevalence pool:
Some people may have been cured or may have died (cured cloud and death drips)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Randomised control trials (RCTs)
Like cohort studies, except participants are allocated random to EG or CG Ideal study, but only if it's both ethical and practical Only done when pretty sure beneficial and not harmful
26
Benefits of RCTs
Participants have equal chance of being allocated to EG or CG, so any differences between the groups are likely to be due to effect of the drug they are given
27
Unblinded RCT
Both patients and investigators know which intervention was given to the patient
28
Single-blind RCT
Only investigators know which intervention was given to which participant
29
Double-blind RCT
Neither participants nor investigators know which intervention was given to which participant Benefit: investigators can't accidentally give away any hints to patients
30
Risk difference
Difference in risks | EGO - CGO or vice versa
31
Risk difference vs relative risk/risk ratio
Relative risk often less useful than risk difference - all decisions should be based on RD not RR alone
32
Relative risk/risk ratio
Ratio of risks | EGO/CGO or vice versa
33
Benefit of a treatment is dependent on...
Risk of dis-ease BEFORE treatment is started
34
Error in epidemiological studies
Occurs when the wrong people are recruited into a study, or the right people are put in the wrong GATE frame --> EGO and CGO incorrect
35
Random error
Error that occurs by chance
36
Why do non-random errors / bias occur
Due to poor study design, processes, or measurements
37
Study validity
A study with only a small amount of random or non-random error is considered to be a valid study
38
Where do non-random errors occur?
``` RAMBOMAN Recruitment of participants into study Allocation of participants to EG and CG + Adjustment in Analyses Maintenance of participants in EG and CG during study period Blind or Objective Measurement of Exposures/Outcomes ANalyses ```
39
Main ways of allocation
By measurement/observation | By random allocation
40
Confounding
When exposure is mixed with another factor that is also associated with the outcome To deal with this, divide/stratify the study into sub-studies/strata so participants with the confounder are all in one sub-study i.e. adjustment
41
Cross-sectional studies and maintenance
There is no follow-up time in cross-sectional studies because participants aren't followed up, so maintenance error is not a problem
42
What to do if participants aren't a representative sample of a population
Instead, can compare sample with other similar samples in different countries
43
Risk difference and Risk ratio - units
RD: units (/people/time) RR: no units
44
RAMBOMAN - Maintenance
Did participants remain in their allocated groups (EG or CG)? Were many participants lost to follow-up (from either EG or CG) (can't happen in cross-sectional study as not followed over time)
45
RAMBOMAN - Blind or Objective Measurement
If outcome is death, it's objective If outcome is cause of death, less objectively measured - requires personal interpretation Measurement errors often not applicable to RCTs Blinded studies reduce subjective measures
46
Paper vs video questionnaires
Video questionnaires measure more objectively compared to paper questionnaires
47
Ecological randomised study reduces chances of...
Confounding
48
Extreme events are often ____ events
Chance/random
49
Why is measuring the exact 'truth' not possible in biology/epidemiology?
The participants are moving targets, so identical measurements of exposures and outcomes in the same or similar people can change from moment to moment Called random measurement error
50
Random measurement error affects...
Measurement of both exposures (E and C) and outcomes (O)
51
'Identical studies'
Identically designed and implemented studies will never include participants with identical characteristics 'Identical studies' will produce different results
52
Random sampling error
The smaller the sample, the greater the chance the sample will be different from the whole population, i.e. the greater the random sampling error
53
95% confidence interval
A measure of the amount of random error in our estimates of EGO, CGO, RR AND RD in the whole population when you only have done one study
54
95% confidence interval - actual definition
In 100 identical studies using samples from the same population, 95/100 of the 95% CIs will include the true value for the population "There is about a 95% probability that the true value of EGO in the whole population of interest, from which the study participants were recruited, lies between __ and __"
55
Confidence intervals describe...
The range of results likely to include the true result in the whole population
56
Every epidemiological measure has random error which can be estimated by a...
Confidence interval
57
Other types of confidence intervals (not 95%)
90% and 99% 99% CI is wider (more uncertainty); need a bigger net to catch the true effect of 99% of the time compared to 95% of the time
58
If CI of CGO doesn't overlap with CI of EGO...
There's a statistically significant difference between them
59
If CI of RD doesn't overlap with no-effect line...
There's a statistically significant effect
60
No-effect line
Where EGO = CGO so RD = 0, or RR = 1
61
If CI for EGO and CGO do overlap...
There's *probably* no statistically significant difference between EGO and CGO
62
How to reduce random sampling error
Do a bigger study; bigger sample --> less chance sample will be different from whole population --> less random sampling error --> narrower CI
63
How to reduce random measurement error
Regression to the mean; repeat measurement/study - often results are less extreme
64
Meta-analysis
Combining studies in a meta-analysis is the next best thing to doing a larger study and reduces random error Mainly done using RCTs
65
Reverse causality
Common error in cross-sectional studies, as you measure exposure and outcome at the same time e. g. must ask if 'diet' was before 'heart attack' i. e. effect may come before cause
66
Individual participant studies - confounding
Investigators measure as many confounding factors as they can --> adjust as much as they can
67
Conservative measure bias
Where RR is closer to 1.0 and RD is closer to 0
68
RRI and RRR
Relative Risk Increase = (RR - 1) x 100% = > 1 | Relative Risk Decrease = (1 - RR) x 100% = < 1
69
ARR and ARI
The RD is an Absolute Risk Reduction if the risk is lower in the EG The RD is an Absolute Risk Increase if the risk is higher in the EG
70
EGO and CGO are measures of ______
Occurrence
71
RR and RD are measures of ____
Effect

POPLHLTH 111 (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions