Module 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is forensic psych?

A

Forensic psychology at its core is the study of
people as they interact with the legal system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are different ways of knowing?

A

Experience, Intuition, Research, Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Experience

A

Gaining knowledge by direct observation or
personal sensory experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intuition

A

Accepting ideas as valid because they “feel”
true/right, you have a “gut” feeling (cognitive heuristics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Authority

A

Accepting ideas because they came from a
respected source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Clinical Forensic Psychology

A

professional practice of psychology
within both civil and criminal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Experimental Forensic Psychology

A

research that examines aspects of
human behaviour directly related to the legal
process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

research that examines aspects of
human behaviour directly related to the legal
process

A

First Era: The birth of legal psychology, Second Era: The dormant years, Third Era: Birth of the Modern Era

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wilhelm Wundt’s laboratory

A
  • Basic principles of psychology (memory,
    perception, sensation) and how it applied to
    business, education, law, etc.
  • There were no “forensic psychologists” – only
    applied psychologists that also happen to look at
    the law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cattell (A student of Wundt’s)

A
  • First experiments in “psychology of testimony”
  • Asked students about things they have witnessed
    in their everyday life
  • How confident are you? (1 = not at all, 2 =
    somewhat, 3 = I am right)
    ex: Hae min Lee..6 weeks later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Binet

A
  • Suggestibility in children
  • Open: “What did you see”
  • Direct: “How was the button attached to the board?”
  • Mildly leading: “Wasn’t the button attached by a
    thread?”
  • Highly misleading: “What was the colour of the thread
    that attached the button to the board?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stern

A
  • Research on testimony
  • “reality experiment”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hugo Munsterberg (student of Wundt’s)

A
  • Father of forensic psychology
  • “On the Witness Stand”
  • Psychologists had all the answers, lawyers
    were too stupid to realize this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

William Marston

A
  • Obtained a law degree and psychology PhD from
    Harvard
  • First person to be hired as “Professor of Legal
    Psychology at the American University
  • Focus of Frye v. United States (1923)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When can we use “experts”

A

Frye + Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Frye test

A
  • 1) research must be peer-reviewed
  • 2) research is testable (falsifiable)
  • 3) research has a recognized rate of error
  • 4) research adheres to professional standards
16
Q

Mohan

A
  • 1) Evidence must be relevant
  • 2) Evidence must be necessary
  • 3) Evidence must not violate other rules of exclusion
    (prejudice vs. probative value)
  • 4) Presented by qualified expert
17
Q
A