Moderation Flashcards

1
Q

variable that specifies conditions under which a given predictor is related to an outcome

A

moderator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Answers the question, “when?”

A

moderator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

implies an interaction effect , where introducing a moderating variable changes the direction or magnitude of the relationship between two variables.

A

moderation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(a) Enhancing
(b) Buffering
(c) Antagonistic

A

moderation analysis (effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

where increasing the moderator would increase the effect of the predictor (IV) on the outcome (DV).

A

Enhancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

where increasing the moderator would decrease the effect of the predictor on the outcome

what effect

A

Buffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

where increasing the moderator(m) would reverse the effect of the predictor(x) on the outcome(y).

what effect

A

Antagonistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“especially if” (semantics) “depending on”

A

moderation analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

IV is continuous
DV is continuous
MV is continuous OR categorical

A

moderation analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

in moderation analysis IV is

A

continuous

predictor

x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

in moderation analysis DV is

A

continuous

y

outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in moderation analysis MV is

A

continuous or categorical
M
MODERATOR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if IV is CATEGORICAL, use _

A

ANOVA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If DV is CATEGORICAL use _

A

LOGISTIC REGRESSION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Step 1: Estimate the interaction effect
Step 2: Statistical inference test
Step 3: If interaction is significant, then probe the interaction by doing a simple slopes analysis (or cheat sheet)

A

Sample
Moderation
Analysis Steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

used to assess the effects of a
moderating variable

A

Hierarchical multiple regression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

To test moderation, we will, in particular, be looking at the _ effect between X and M and whether or not such an effect is significant in predicting Y

A

Interaction
effect between X and M and it’s significant

Hierarchical multiple regression

18
Q

X is what variable

A

Independent Variable

19
Q

Y is what variable

A

Dependent Variable

20
Q

M is what variable

A

Moderator Variable

21
Q

• Main Effects are Present
• Lack of Interaction
• Consistent Relationship
• Caution in Interpretation

A

Possible Conclusions in Moderation Analysis

22
Q

The significant simple slopes suggest that there are meaningful relationships between the predictor and the outcome at different levels of the moderator.

This means that predictor consistently affects the outcome, regardless of the level of the moderator.

A

Main Effects are Present

23
Q

This _ simple slopes suggest that there are meaningful relationships between the predictor and the outcome at different levels of the moderator. This means that predictor consistently affects the ourcome, regardless of the level of the moderator.

A

significant

24
Q

The non-significant interaction effect implies that the strength or direction of the relationship between predictor (IV) and outcome(DV) does not significantly change across different levels of the moderator.

In other words, while the relationship exists, it is not influenced by the moderator to a degree that is statistically significant

A

Lack of Interaction

25
Q

The _ interaction effect implies that the strength or direction of the relationship between predictor (IV) and outcome(DV) does not significantly change across different levels of the moderator. In other words, while the relationship exists, it is not influenced by the moderator to a degree that is statistically significant

A

non-significant

26
Q

Since the simple slopes are significant at both low and high levels of the moderator, you can conclude that the predictor’s effect on the outcome is relatively stable, even if it varies slightly in magnitude.

A

Consistent Relationship

27
Q

While the simple slopes analysis provides insights into the effect at specific levels of the moderator, the lack of a significant interaction means that one should be cautious about overinterpreting the differences in slopes as indicating a nuanced moderating effect.

A

Caution in Interpretation

28
Q

The effect of IQ on reading is not moderated by method of
teaching. What hypotheses?

A

Ho

29
Q

The effect of IQ on reading is moderated by method of teaching. What hypotheses?

A

Ha

30
Q

Step 1: Estimate the interaction effect - use

A

ANOVA

31
Q

Step 2: Statistical inference test - check the

A

significance

32
Q

Step 2: Statistical inference test - check the look at the _ (interaction effect)

A

p-value or F
(interaction effect)

33
Q

p-value or F, below the alpha level (<.05),
then it is

A

significant

34
Q

it is much better if the p-value is

A

decreasing

35
Q

is a follow-up procedure to the hierarchical regression

A

slope analysis

36
Q

Step 3: If interaction is significant, then
probe the interaction by doing a _ analysis (or cheat sheet).

○ compute values that are higher or
lower

A

simple slopes analysis

37
Q

actual value, the impact of IV to
DV

A

Estimates

38
Q

estimate increase = _ if p-
value is small

A

significant

39
Q

● the intersection of slopes is significant
● only a secondary analysis

A

Simple Slope Analysis

40
Q

To test the hypothesis that [IV] affects [DV] , and whether [M] moderates the relationship between [IV] and [DV] , a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted. Results show that IV and [M] (B = ___, p = ___) have [in]significant main effects on [DV]. The interaction between [IV] and [M] is [also] [in]significant (B =___, p = ___). Furthermore, it is indicated that IV [do not] leads to DV depending on the presence of M.

A

Reporting Results
Format for Moderation:

41
Q

Simple Slopes Analysis indicate that when M scores are high (B = ___, p = ___), the effect of IV on DV is _______. On the other hand, when M scores are low (B = ___, p=___), the effect of the IV on the DV is _______.

A

Format for Simple Slopes Analysis