models of memory Flashcards

1
Q

aim of milner

A

The better understand the effects of surgey on HM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

hm background

A

Manchester, connecticut 1926
Hit by a cyclist when he was 7
Epileptic attacks started when he was 7
By 27 seizures were so bad he could not leave a normal life

Parents and family agreed : tissue from temporal lobe and hippocampus on both sides of hm brain

Breda milner explored Hm until he died in 2008. She noticed
-He forgot events nearly as fast as they occurred
-“Like waking from a dream; every day is alone itself”
-Remembered childhood
-Personality unchanged
-Recalled little of the 12 years before operation

After the op his retrograde amnesia diminished and by 1966 he only had problems recallung events 1 years before operation
He mostly suffered from anterograde amnesia he couldnt regonises faces of people he just met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

method procedure of milner

A

Method triangulation occurred. She used:
-Psychometric testing; iq tests
-Direct observations
Interviews with him and family
-Cognitive testing; memory recall such as reverse mirror drawing
MRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

results milner

A

He could not acquire episodic knowledge - memory for events - or semantic knowledge - general knowledge of the world - suggesting that whatever was removed are important for transfer between short an long term memory

He could rember his house and draw a floor plan- meaning cognitive map type of memory isnt coded the same as episodic

He had working memory, he could carry out normal conversation. Minimal level of retention of what had been heard or said

Procedural memories were maintained, e.g. he could mow a lawn. He improved in the performance of new skills such as reverse mirror drawing, yet never remembered it.

The MRI showed temporal lobe and hippocampus has most damage, the damage in hippocampus seems to explain STM - LTM as this is where aectycholine is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

bullet point results milner

A

The following is a summary of the key findings:
-The memory systems in the brain constitute a highly specialized and complex system.
-The hippocampus plays a critical role in converting memories of experiences from short-term memory to long-term memory.
However, researchers found that short-term memory is not stored in the hippocampus as HM was able to retain information for a while if he rehearsed it.
-Since HM was able to retain some memories of events that happened long before his surgery it indicates that the medial temporal region is not the site of permanent storage but rather plays a role in the organization and permanent storage of memories elsewhere in the brain.
-Implicit memory contains several stores - for example, procedural memory, emotional memory, and skills and habits. Each of these areas is related to different brain areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

milner strengths

A

Extremely longitudinal over 50 years
Method triangulation
Ehthically consentual, confidential and protection from harm
Ecologically valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

weaknesses milner

A

Cannot be replicaed however other cases such as clive wearing confirm it
Some data was retrospective;(collected after the event) we dont know hms cognitive ability pre accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Retrograde amnesia

A

The loss of memories before onset of amnesia, but they can form new memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anterograde amnesia

A

Loss of the ability to form long term memories yet memories remain from the past. Stm memory functions and procedural functions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

landry and bartling aim

A

To investigate whether articulory suppression will influence the recall of a witten list of phonolically dissimilar letters in a series of recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

participants landry and bartling and test type

A

-34 undergraduate psychology students
- Independent sample design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

method/prcedure of landry

A

-Experimental group: saw a list of letters that they had to recall whilst saying 1 and 2 once per second
-Control: saw list of letter but did not have to say 1 and 2

-10 lists constructed randlomy from: F,K,L,M,R,X,Q because they dont sound similar
-They had an answe sheet with 7 blanks in each row. They were shown this first to understand

-Control: shown list for 5 second, wait 5 seconds, write correct order x 10
-Experimental: same thing but they were asked to repeatedly say 1 and 2 till it was time to fill in the sheet x 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results of landry and bartling

A

in the control group the mean accurate recall was 76% sd 0.13

In the experimental group mean accurate recall was 45% sd 0.14

Ttest was calculated with a significance of 0.01

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

results landry and bartling

A

The results support hypothesis, showing that articulatory suppression is preventing rehearsal in phonological loop because of overload

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strengths landry and bartling

A

-Well controlled with a high level of internal validity
-Cause and effect can be determined
Reliable and can be replicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

weaknesses landry and bartling

A

Lab experiment so artificial and low ecological validity

17
Q

antergrade amnesia

A

inability to create new memories

18
Q

retrograde

A

inability to access previous memories

19
Q

Primacy, renency, asymptote

A

Words remembered at the beginning of a list - we can acoustically rehearse these words in our head before having to to recall them

The words still remain in the stm memory and have not been displaced by information yet !

The words in the middle of the list wich have no time to be rehearsed by get displaced as asymptotes

20
Q

glazer study 1 aim

A

To see if time intervals between words on a list would increase the number of words recalled at the start of the list

Primacy effect would be greater

To see if each word was read twice would increase recall

21
Q

glazer study 1 procedure

A

240 army enlisted men
Independent sample design

3 second; one or twice
6 second once or twice
9 seconds once or twice

8x twenty word lists
All lists were the same
One sylabblyed

They had to write down any words they recalled

22
Q

study 1 results galzerr

A

ncreased time intervals meant an increased recall, apart from the words at the end of the list
Repetition dint rlly effect apart from 3 second condition

23
Q

conlsuion study 1 glazer

A

Primacy effect is the result of rehearsal. More time meant more rehearsal, the words still in the stm were the same as they were still in STM

24
Q

study 2 glazer

A

46 army enlisted men
Repeated measures design

15 word lists
Shown on a screen with a projector
Shown for 1 second at two second intervals
Experimenter read it out loud

There was immediate recall were a hash indicated too write straight away
Delayed recall were they had to count for 10 or 30 seconds

25
results glazer sudy 2
When asked for immediate recall - primacy and recency effect was shown 10 second task reduced recency effect 30 second task recency wasnt present
26
strentghs glazer
✅ Controlled lab setting increases internal validity ✅ Clear IVs and DVs (e.g., time interval, repetition, delay) ✅ Use of both independent and repeated measures designs helps test different memory components ✅ Standardized procedures (e.g., word lists, timing, instructions) ✅ Supports cognitive theory (multi-store model of memory) with evidence for primacy and recency effects
27
weaknessex glazer
❌ Artificial task (memorizing word lists) lacks ecological validity ❌ Only male army participants — limited generalizability ❌ Repeated measures may have order effects (e.g., fatigue, practice) ❌ Participants may have used different memory strategies (not controlled) ❌ Lacks qualitative data — doesn't explain how participants remembered words