models Flashcards

1
Q

define model

A

simplified or idealized representation of a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define statistical model

A

mathematical relationship between variables, that hold under specific assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

behaviourism view of cognitions

A

“black box”
input –> output, unknown what happens in the brain between the two

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive box and arrow models (and example)

A

models that describe the relationship between different mental processes → assumption that the mind operates like multi-staged information-processing machines

started simply but can be very complex

e.g. Broadbent (1985) levels of processing of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

studying cognitive models

A

manipulating input and observing output to figure out what occurs in between
e.g. gorilla video experiment about paying attention to the stimuli - why does it change when attention given to it - use Broadbent’s model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

formal cognitive models

A

aka computational models
a mathematical description of the relationship between mental processes
usually expressed through computer code
assumptions are explicit
often provides numerical predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

informal cognitive models

A

verbal description of the relationship between different cognitive procedures
often some assumptions are implicit
often provides only directional predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define simplification and abstraction

A

simplification = not going to describe all the info, only critical parts
abstraction = generation of general rules and concepts from specific info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

applying simplification and abstraction to models

A
  • need to balance simplification and abstraction in models
  • depending on what question is being asked or process is being conveyed
  • emphasis on certain elements that are the purpose of the model e.g. model train about how the wheels work doesn’t need complex engine
  • simple is not a criticism of a model → all models are simple → only bad if it is simple in what it is trying to express
  • all models are wrong due to simplification, but are useful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

predictions and or explanations in models

A

non-scientific explain after the fact - cannot provide falsifiable predictions (Karl Popper)
scientific models must produce predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

scientific models predictions

A

can be directional or numerical
directional = one thing is more/less than the other
numerical = use a data set and correlations to predict what would happen with a new data point e.g. find a person’s income and predict their happiness based on previous data –> can extrapolate current data
* numerical predictions can vary in levels of accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

theoretical vs statistical models explanations

A

theoretical always provide explanations for data found
goes beyond the statistical models - they only describe the relationship without explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hierarchy of research (5)

A

framework
theory
model
hypothesis
data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

hierarchy of research: framework

A

conceptual system that defines terms and provides control e.g. cognitive psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

hierarchy of research: theory and model

A

theory = scientific proposition that provides relations between phenomena e.g. early-selection theory
model = schematic representation of a theory e.g. Broadbent’s filter model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hierarchy of research: hypothesis and data

A

hypothesis = narrow testable statement

data = collected observations often as part of an experiment

17
Q

models: explanation without prediction

A

models which can predict group differences (very broad) but not individual cases

18
Q

models: prediction without explanation

A

e.g. can predict whether an individual will get Alzheimer’s even though Alzheimer’s isn’t fully understood yet
e.g. computer models using data to give prediction - more data = more predictive power –> like a “black box” as the operator doesn’t understand what the computer is doing to find this
all statistical models fit this - give data without explanation

19
Q

hierarchy of formal models (6)

A

framework
theory
specification
implementation
hypothesis
data

same as for research but model is split into specification and implementation

20
Q

formal models: specification

A

formal description of relations described by a theory e.g. formal model of symbolic representations

21
Q

formal models: implementation

A

specific instantiation of a specification e.g. computer program which can simulate and predict numerical outputs from an input

22
Q

advantages of formal models (3 - brief)

A

more accurate predictions
counter-intuitive predictions
explicit assumptions

23
Q

advantages of formal models: more accurate predictions

A
  • easier to reject bad models - see if predictions are unreasonable
  • select which experiments to perform - if two models give same prediction, that isn’t useful as we cannot tell which was actually correct - with numerical predictions (e.g. % rates) we can see which got closer
  • subtle form of hypothesis testing - how close model is to predicting actual result - not just general trend but closeness to specific number/data
  • prediction is more accurate - the model might still be bad and therefore prediction can be wrong even when accurate
24
Q

advantages of formal models: counter-intuitive predictions

A
  • clear description of predictions so when predictions seem wrong it is obvious
  • hard with informal to notice when counter-intuitive predictions are made
25
advantages of formal models: explicit assumptions
* reveal unanswered questions, flaws in reasoning, contradictory/unreasonable assumptions * can make assumptions transparent for others to see e.g. verbal models cannot show what occurs but formal can simulate this
26
limitations of formal models [wont be tested on this]
* requires expertise * transparency * best compared against other computational models, not against informal * numerical predictions can be premature changing the model takes time - this can limit progress * may seem to provide scientific validity even when it isn't e.g. neural network models * making a model simulate a cognitive task does not teach us about cognition
27
issue understanding the brain
can only sample small amount of activity from a small brain area
28
break down of brain data to understand it (Marr) (3)
1. computation → problem being solved 2. algorithm → steps/rules to solve problem 3. implementation → actual machinery focus too much on any of these 3 is bad -> hyperfocus doesn't allow for interactions between the 3 - creates non specific theories that might not match
29
bottom-up approach to brain data
neuroscience and AI implementation → rules → problem example: machinery of neural circuits → generate algorithm from these → what problems do these algorithms solve
30
Marr (1982) view on approaches to brain data
understand algorithms better by understanding the nature of the problem being solved rather than examining the mechanism therefore use top-down approach focus on mechanics takes away from other parts - too small detail without context
31
top-down approach to brain data
Marr's view - and most cognitive psychologists problem → rules → implementation e.g. problem to solve → what algorithms can solve this → how algorithms are implemented in neural circuits
32
Epstein (2008) - core reading * misconceptions with modelling (2) * reasons for modelling (there are 16 total, 5 written here)
goal isn't always prediction theories don't arise from and summarise data - they often precede and guide data collection instead reasons: guide data collection, explanations, raise new questions, illuminate core dynamics, suggest analogies
33
Guest and Martin (2021) - core reading * why is using models helpful * what is an open theory
models are transparent in how conclusions are drawn --> forced to analyse information closely open theories are developed explicitly and defined formally * can recognise flaws in replication * open theories are better to use for their transparency and what they can tell you about the theory being tested