cognitive control - inhibition Flashcards

1
Q

define inhibiton

A

controlling ones attention, behaviour, thoughts, and/or emotions to override a strong internal predisposition or external lure

not simple stimulus-response driven, contextual response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define flexibility

A

changing perspectives or approaches to a problem - flexibly adjusting to new demands, rules, priorities → switching between tasks

large range of behaviours applied to contexts flexibly → experiment participation where you respond to stimuli and follow and adapt to task rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define multi-tasking

A

some tasks can be done in parallel if they don’t “collide” → related to attention, can they be done on “auto-pilot”

related to working memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 main features of cognitive control

A

inhibition
flexibility
multi-tasking (working memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is cognition

A

basis for intelligent behaviour

overrides reflexive, habitual responses in favour of complex often long-term goals

cognitive control of: sensory, memory, and motor system

in prefrontal cortex in mammals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

difference between cognitive control and executive function

A

executive functions = specific components e.g. working memory

cognitive control= less clear separation of distinct subcomponents

both are top-down mental processes (not stimulus-driven bottom-up ones)
requires effort or attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cognitive control – core/basic abilities and higher-order/insight-related abilities

A

core/basic abilities = working memory, inhibitory control, flexibility

higher-order/insight-related = object permanence, self-recognition, mental time travel, ToM, tool use, causal reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

are different executive functions connected?
role and importance of EFs (7)?

A

questioned whether they can be entirely separated or work together
unknown if they are hierarchically structured

importance of EFs:
* impaired in mental disorders e.g. addiction, ADHD, OCD, depression, SZ etc
* poor EF associated with obesity, overeating, substance abuse
* idea that goof EF = better quality of life
* better school readiness and success
* job success
* marital harmony
* public safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

multicomponent model of memory

A

central executive
VSSP, episodic buffer, phonological loop
LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cognitive flexibility + task to test this

A

builds on other executive functions e.g. inhibition of previous perspective and loading new perspective into working memory

Wisconsin card sorting task
* task = draw a card and assign to a category to match colour, number, or symbol of another card
*given feedback on whether it was correct or not based on current rule (unknown to them)
* if correct, draw same category again
* if wrong, try another category
* “correct” category will change without warning so participant has to change behaviour in order to find correct category to match

people with some impairments struggle with this → e.g. frontal lobe damage, SZ, stroke, OCD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

challenges studying cognitive flexibility

A

neurological damage is unique to each patient

studied to identified localised involvement

solving task doesn’t only involve cognitive flexibility but also other aspects of EF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

inhibition – selecting appropriate thoughts and actions

A

strengthen appropriate response and inhibit other inappropriate ones

impulsivity related to deficient inhibitory processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

role of frontal lobe in inhibition

A

inhibit automatic and habitual behaviour

also basal ganglia does this

shown by neurological studies on frontal lobe damage and utilisation behaviour (e.g. given glasses and see if they put them on correctly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

directed vs competitive inhibition

A

directed = don’t do behaviour X e.g. stop driving at a red light

competitive = many actions competing and inhibition each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cognitive control stopping mechanisms

A

put a brake on inappropriate responses

to mediate goal-directed behaviour and self-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

related constructs to inhibition (2)

A

self-control
* impaired common in many clinical disorders e.g. OCD, drug-addiction, gambling
* value-based decision making and delay discounting

attention
* similar to aspects of cognitive control → selecting/prioritising some processes over others
* often sensory → therefore more automatic than CC and EF
* other strategic forms may involve different mechanisms than sensory attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

importance of inhibition in wider context (4)

A
  • describes behaviour, decision-making, and cognitive processes
  • measuring inhibition is important for some diagnoses
  • related to clinical and developmental and neuroscience
  • related to AI and robotics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

examples of inhibitory control (2)

A

driving in lots of traffic and phone rings/text message
* default = keep driving
* context = if you’re expecting an important call you are more likely to park or check the message

marshmallow test with kids
* long term or short term gain

19
Q

2 types of inhibition

A

behavioural inhibition = stopping actions
cognitive inhibition = stopping mental processes

overlapping brain processes from imaging studies for both of these processes

20
Q

3 types of behavioural inhibition

A

deferred gratification → impulsive choice → marshmallow test, linked to delayed gratification
* delay discounting, probability discounting, effort discounting

response inhibition → impulsive action → not answering phone whilst driving
* action postponing (waiting), action restraint/withholding, action cancellation (stopping)

reversal learning → inflexibility, compulsivity → stop understanding of one situation and think of new instead e.g. Wisconsin card sorting task
* discrimination reversal, rule/strategy reversal

21
Q

cognitive inhibition

A

difficult to understand and study

control of movement is similar to control of ideas

movements can be described and measured more precisely than ideas → can study principles and mechanisms of cognitive inhibition through studying motor response inhibition
* overriding planned or already initiated actions

22
Q

inhibition and EF

A

voluntary inhibition → is it a component of executive control?

current view = EFs require one another so combination or attention, inhibition, and flexibility allows complex behaviours

inhibition and attention together for selection of new goals, shifting of focus, performance monitoring and updating goals

impulsivity, compulsivity, and distractibility can inhibit parts of this process

23
Q

inhibition and impulsivity

A

acting quickly can be advantageous but doing this persistently can be risky and maladaptive

impulsivity = deficient inhibitory process
link to addiction, ADHD, mania etc.

response inhibition used to measure impulsivity in lab tasks

although response inhibition only corresponds to some types of impulsivity → not all types

use animal studies of response inhibition for neural mechanisms → quantifiable

24
Q

reaction time distribution

A

reaction time = time between onset of stimulus and response
contextual - depending on stimulus type

distribution = positive skew

25
race model of reaction time
linear function used to represent a trial faster = steeper line x = time, y = position (activation of process) horizontal threshold - faster response crosses this threshold first slope of process and threshold = model parameters choose parameter values to fit behavioural data from given participant average out over many trials (look at notion for graphs if needed)
26
neurophysiology of reaction time variability
*recordings of frontal eye fields of monkeys performing reaction time task * frontal cortex neurons indicate reaction times vary due to rate variability in slope of underlying process * measuring single neuron in multiple trials result shown in a line graph of average firing rate: * time 0 = onset of movement (saccade) * before onset = neuron sharply increases firing rate * firing rate when movement begins = threshold for action no difference in threshold for action fast trails have difference in slope of firing rate increase to slow trials - fast = steeper slope reflected in race model
27
4 behavioural tasks to measure inhibition
stroop task marshmallow test go/nogo task stop-signal task
28
go/nogo task
participants must respond to a go signal and not to a nogo signal e.g. traffic lights where green is go and red is stop assignment of go and nogo are arbitrary - depends on task instructions measure reaction times and number of correct trials
29
stop-signal tasks
2 trial types: go → green = clap stop → green followed by red = don’t clap random order so stop signal cannot be predicted different variants of a stop-signal task with different stimuli, responses, and trial types
30
stop-signal delay
time between go and stop signals → shorter stop-signal delays make stopping easier **short delay** (~200ms) = response not yet imminent = easier to inhibit **long delay** (~800ms) = closer to action, harder to inhibit response = imminent responses are harder to inhibit
31
SSRT
stop-signal reaction time how quickly participant reacts to stop signal → reaction is the inhibition of behavioural response cannot directly measure as you cannot measure not doing anything → but can estimate it using reaction time models and stop-signal tasks
32
behavioural data in stop-signal tasks - basic and advanced measures
basic measure: * reaction time in go trials and failed stop trials * number of correct or error trials → % correct stops and % failed stops issue of waiting strategies → never clap = 100% success rate on correct stops so need more info advanced measures: * inhibition functions = probability of motor response based on stop signal delay * stop-signal reaction times
33
intuition for stop-signal reaction time
cannot directly measure stop signal reaction time but can estimate SSRT: if stop-signal reaction time is 100ms: * 100ms is needed to make use of stop-signal * response within 100ms of stop-signal cannot be stopped * later than 100ms after signal can be stopped know this based on reaction time distribution failed stops * reaction times in (empirical) failed stop trials are mostly fast → inline with consideration from stop-signal reaction times
34
SSRT - 3 components of stopping
stimulus detection action selection inhibition
35
SSRT - what type of inhibition do they measure
SSRT - describe how well you can inhibit response reactive inhibition → speed of reacting to stop signal (not proactive inhibition) common measure used in psychological studies on neurological and psychiatric conditions
36
race model of stopping
same model as race model of reaction time - includes a stopping stimulus with the go stimulus if go reaches threshold first, action is carried out if not, it is inhibited repeating across many trials to find average → sometimes go will win and sometimes stop will win steepness of stop doesn't changed much between trials but go does vary * stop fails = steep go processes (fast reaction time) * stop succeeds = flat go process (slow reaction time) SSRT = time between stop signal and it crossing the threshold GoRT = time between go signal and crossing the threshold * analogous to each other
37
using stop-signal tasks for modelling
* basis of computational models to provide estimate of SSRT from behavioural data * mathematical - connects go and stop RTs, stop-signal delays, and stopping performance * reaction times occur in go and failed stop trials * SSRTs occur in stop trials, can’t be measured directly, estimated using behavioural data from many trials * general model → describes behaviour and underlying cognitive and neurobiological processes * application to different animals * application to different types of stopping, stimuli, and tasks * allows us to model inhibition functions – can be compared with patient populations or used in conjunction with imaging – fMRI, EEG
38
proactive vs reactive inhibition
reactive = quick reaction to stop signal proactive = adjust behaviour in anticipation of potentially having to inhibit a response - prepared to stop * visible as a change in GoRT
39
measure of proactive inhibition in stop-signal tasks
using explicit and implicit cues explicit: * given cue to indicate possibility of stop signal occurring or not occurring * done trial by trial implicit * vary probability of stop signals across blocks * e.g. block 1 has many stops, block 2 has very few stops * needs to be randomised distribution of stop signals or it becomes predictable
40
define: * trial * block * session
**trial** = single presentation of a stimulus-response sequence **block** = many trials with specific parameters e.g. more or less stops depending on block **session** = consists of one or more block, sessions separated by longer time intervals e.g. days apart
41
step by step measuring proactive inhibition with stop-signal
2 blocks studied 1. average reaction times from go trials in block #1 2. do the same for block #2 3. calculate proactive inhibition score -> mean(RTblock#2) - mean(RTblock#1) comparing speed of response to go trials are when there are more or less stop trials present * more stops = slower response to "go" due to proactive inhibition trying to predict stop signals counterbalance order of block sequence to account for order effects
42
proactive adjustment hypothesis
people adjust the response threshold when they predict stop signals -- balance stopping and going fast responses are harder to inhibit so they wait more to go in trials due to predicting potential stops
43
impaired stopping - parkinsons
death of DAergic neurons → therefore levodopa for treatment to increase DA severe motor and cognitive symptoms stop-signal tasks compare reaction times in patients with Parkinson’s longer SSRT in patients compared to control * no significant differences between those on or not on levodopa medication - so not DA related?
44
what causes impaired stopping - 3 examples
longer SSRTs than control for: * alcohol dependence * methamphetamine abuse * cocaine abuse