MMSE-2 Flashcards

1
Q

overview

A

-Original MMSE is one of the most widely used brief screening instruments for cognitive impairment

-used in a variety of settings, including screening individual patients, tracking progress over time, screening for large populations, and clinical trials

-mostly just know the differences in the change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

goals for the revision

A

-1. Revise some of the original items to better standardize its administrations, particularly for translations
-ex. no if ands or buts doesnt translate

-2. Provide an even briefer version that could be used for rapid assessment

-3. Provide a slightly longer version that would be more sensitive to subcortical dementia and that would not have a ceiling effect - after a certain point not as sensitive to pick up certain changes

-4. Develop equivalent alternate forms to decrease practice effects in serial administration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Goal 1: revise original items

A

-The MMSE-2 Standard Version (MMSE-2:SV) maintains the same structure and scoring as the original MMSE

-Changes were made to improve problematic items and to better standardize administration in other languages (e.g., penny, no if, ands, or buts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MMSE-2: standard version- comparing the original to new

A

-no motor component of the comprehension portion now
-reading, writing, drawing- same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

equivalency between the MMSE and MMSE-2: SV

A

-Like the MMSE, the MMSE-2:SV has a raw score range of 0-30

-The generalizability coefficient (n = 411) between the MMSE and the MMSE-2:SV total raw score was .97

-Therefore, it is possible to switch from MMSE to the MMSE-2:SV without compromising longitudinal data and without any change in the normal range of scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Goal 2: develop briefer version

A

-Can be used for quick cognitive screener, specifically when an individual has not been referred for specific cognitive impairment

-Composed of Registration/Recall, Orientation to Time, and Orientation to Place

-Raw score ranges from 0-16 points

-Tasks were selected based on literature review, use in the MMSE, and their sensitivity and specificity to detect dementia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

goal 3: develop expanded version

A

-Consists of all of the items on the MMSE-2:SV plus two new tasks:

-Story Memory: An immediate recall of a brief story

-Processing Speed: A symbol-digit coding task

Theory behind the decision:
Wanted an additional memory task due their importance in this area.
Added subtests that statistically differentiate mild dementia from normals
Wanted to make it more difficult to fake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MMSE-2: expanded version

A

-Improves the clinical utility of the MMSE by:

-Extending the test’s ceiling- increase sensitivity

-Increasing the range of raw scores (0-90)

-Increasing the sensitivity for individuals with less severe cognitive impairment (subcortical dementia, MCI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

goal 4: develop equivalent alternate forms

A

-Two forms (Blue and Red) were developed for each of the 3 versions of the MMSE-2

-Based on the results of the equating study, the accuracy of the equating process was confirmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

administration issues

A

-18 years and older

-Relatively easy to administer, typically one training session is sufficient

-Test Materials:
-User’s Manual
-Pocket Norms Guide
-Scoring Templates for Processing Speed
-Administration Forms :
-MMSE-2:BV Blue and Red Form
-MMSE-2:SV Blue and Red Form
-MMSE-2:EV Blue and Red Form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

determining which version is appropriate

A

-MMSE-2:BV
-Adequate for screening large populations; screening individuals in practice who have not been referred because of cognitive complaints

-MMSE-2:SV
-Used first if referred because of complaint of cognitive decline or if patient indicates memory is not as good as it use to be; depending on results may want to supplement with MMSE-2:EV

-MMSE-2:EV
-Same as above + well educated (ceiling effect); suspected subcortical dementia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

scoring

A

-Mean raw total scores are presented by age and education level

-T scores are also presented by age and education level

-Pocket Guide

-Reliable Change Scores

-Although T scores are provided, it is the raw scores that are usually interpreted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interpretation

A

-A cut score of 22/23 is typically used with the original MMSE

-Because the MMSE-2:SV is equivalent to the MMSE, the same cut score is suggested

-The authors have not provided specific recommendations for the new forms, however ranges of raw score cut scores are provided for the dementia, AD, and subcortical samples by form

-22/23 is cutoff for Standard Version. If below this raw score, likely cognitive impairment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

development of the norms

A

-Because of the importance of age and education on MMSE-2 scores norms were developed for several different age and education ranges

-Two resources for age and education adjustments are provided:
-1. Means and standard deviations of total raw scores by age and education groups
-2. Age- and education-adjusted T scores (continuous norming method)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly