Mixed Set 1 [FLK2] Flashcards
Trusts - Breach of trust by trustee (191)
(a) is the intention of the trustee relevant to their liability for breach?
(b) can a breach of trust occur by action or omission?
(c) does a breach automatically lead to liability?
(a) No (don’t account for MR)
(b) either way
act = when T acted outside their scope of powers
omission = when T failed to take adequate action to protect the trust asset
(c) no, T is only liable if the breach led to loss to the trust/ an unauthorized gain
B must prove that (i) T breached the trust + (ii) that breach led to the trust suffering a loss
Trusts - Breach of trust by trustee (192)
(a) when there is more than 1 T, is the T vicariously liable for their co-trustees?
(b) what kind of liability does T have?
(c) if one T acts unanimously and breaches trust, are the other T’s liable to B?
(a) No. But, they would have committed a BREACH by omission for neglecting their trust duties as they should have known what their co-trusties were up to (since T’s are required to act unanimously)
(b) joint and several
(c) no, only breaching T is liable as other T’s did not give consent
How should a T who is found to be in breach of trust compensate the trust for any loss suffered? (193)
From their personal funds
Can a T who is found to be in breach of trust claim indemnity from a fellow co-T? If yes, when? (193)
Yes
Where:
(a) Co-T was fraudulent
(b) Co-T was a solicitor-trustee and exercised controlling influence
Can a T who is found to be in breach of trust claim indemnity from a beneficiary? If yes, when? (194)
Yes
Where:
(a) B who is a T exclusively benefitted from the breach
(b) Where B instigated the breach/ consented to the breach in writing
Measure of damages for T (194)
(a) where there is a breach of trust? how to remedy?
(b) where there is a breach of fidic duty? how to remedy?
(a) compensation and T is personally liable for any loss and T must restore the fund to the position it was before the breach
(b) restitution (when T has made an unauthorized profit). T must account for any profits made.*
*Court may compound interest (ie principal sum + interest)
Is a breach of T’s fidic duty also a breach of trust? (195)
No
T’s breach of trust (195)
(a) how is it caused?
(b) what do you need to prove?
(c) who is liable?
(d) who can T obtain indemnity from?
(e) measure of damages?
(a) by an action or omission
(b) loss resulting from the breach
(c) T is liable for their own breach BUT liability is joint and several
(d)
- fraudulent co-T
- solicitor-trustee who exercised a controlling influence
- beneficiary-T who benefitted from the breach
- beneficiary who consented/ instigated the breach
(e) compensation for the loss
If a T is being sued for breach of trust, what are the defences available? (196)
(a) exemption clauses
Any ambiguity in the clause = contra proferentem rule
Fraudulent T cannot rely on this
(b) request court to release them wholly/ partly (S61 TA 1925)
The court will be less likely to use this for a pro T
(c) if B played a role, use that as a defence
If B was involved/ excused the breach (acquiescence)
For both, B must be suis juris + fully understand (no need to show that B benefitted)
(d) claim that an action is time barred due to LA 1980 (6 years from the date on which the right to action accrued)*
except if T fraud/ concealment/ mistake - time starts running from when B discovers it
If T breaches the trust and uses the limitation period defence, what are the limitations of this defence? (199)
(a) no limitation period is T is a party to a fraud
(b) no limitation period to recover trust property and its proceeds from T
What is the doctrine of latches? (200)
This is in relation to T’s breach of trust
It is an equitable defence raised by D against an equitable remedy claim (eg specific performance/ injunction)
D must show that C’s undue delay in asserting their rights would be unjust to D thus C is no longer entitled to the equitable remedy
What is acquiescence? (200)
This is in relation to T’s breach of trust
It is an equitable defence available to D against a B, if they can show:
(a) B excused the breach upon discovering it by delaying it to point that the doctrine of laches applies; or
(b) B waived their right to sue by confirming intention not to sue (B must be suis juris + have full knowledge)
(a) Fraud by false representation elements
(b) Can it be committed even if D is not successful?
(a) Occurs when an individual dishonestly makes a false representation, intending to make a gain for themselves or another, or to cause loss to another or expose another to a risk of loss.
(b) Yes, as the essence of the crime lies in the act of making the false representation itself, not in the success or completion of the transaction.
Land - Easements
(a) Can a R to light be an easement?
(b) What kind of R will it give the dom landowner?
(c) What does it prevent the serv landowner from doing?
(d) How can you create this easement through the Prescription Act 1832?
(a) Yes it can be created as an easement
(b) entitlement to receive SUFFICIENT light for comfortable use and enjoyment of his prop, taking into account current and future potential use
(c) obstructing the light (if the light falls below the level of sufficiency = nuisance)
(d) must be enjoyed for 20 years w/o interruption, w/o force, w/o secrecy, w/o permission (an interruption of 1+ years/ written consent/ agreement of the serv owner will prevent this right being acquired)
Property
Are seller’s responses (either oral or written) to pre-contract enquiries representations or warranties?
Representations.
If untrue, then the seller will commit a misrepresentation.
The seller is not obliged to answer the buyer’s pre-contract enquiries. Where the seller does answer pre-contract enquiries, the seller is under a duty not to misrepresent facts which induce the buyer to enter into the contract.
Under the Fraud Act 2006, what is the test for dishonesty? Objective or subjective?
Conduct must be objectively dishonest (so take into consideration the standards of ordinary people).
What is hearsay?
(a) any statement (oral or written) not made in court
(b) it is presented to substantiate the truth of its content
Admitting hearsay evidence (140)
(a) If D wants to admit evidence, what is the standard of proof?
(b) Who has the burden to prove admissibility?
(c) When does P have to prove that it is admissible? What is the standard for P?
(a) must establish reliability on the balance of probabilities
(b) whoever is seeking to rely on the evidence
(note: no one has to prove inadmissibility)
(c) Only if D says it is inadmissible. P must prove it is admissible beyond reasonable doubt.
Hearsay (135)
- Reasons for witness unavailability in hearsay? (statute)
- What is res gestae? (common law)
- When is hearsay evidence admitted?
- dead/ unfit/ out of the UK/ cant be found/ fear
- statement made as a result of a close and intimate connection to the event and usually in emotional state (can be admitted)
- res gestae (common law)
- unavailability as per statute (1 above)
- business document
- if all parties agree
- in the interests of justice
Trusts
How can B force the retirement of appointed trustees? S19 TOLATA
The following prerequisites must be met:
(1) no appointor has been named in the trust instrument;
(2) the Bs are all of full age and capacity;
(3) the Bs are together absolutely entitled to the trust property; and
(4) at least two trustees or a trust corporation will remain.
Then B’s must unanimously agree and give written direction to T to retire by giving notice to all T’s
At least 2 T’s + replacement trustee should remain, else (5) all continuing T’s should consent to the retirement
How can you appoint a replacement trustee where an existing trustee dies and the trust is silent as to the power of appointment?
S 36(1) gives remaining non-settlor trustees the power to appoint new T in writing
Who can appoint a NEW trustee? (170)
Settlor or testator
How many trustees do you need?
Land = min 2 individual Ts/ 1 sole trust corp and max 4 individuals
Other = min 1 and no max
Who can appoint additional/ replacement trustees? (171)
- person nominated for the purpose of appointing (ie trust doc)
- surviving Ts
- PR of of T
- court