Misuse of Drugs Flashcards

1
Q

Give some examples of Class A, B and C drugs.

A

Class A: Ecstasy, heroine, cocaine, crack cocaine, magic mushrooms, crystal meth, LSD.

Class B: Cannabis leaves, cannabis resin, spice, mephedrone, amphetamines and barbiturates.

Class C: Khat, tranquillisers, anabolic steroids and some painkillers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are temporary class drug orders?

A

The Home Secretary has the power, under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, to make any drug (likely to be misused or could have harmful effects) subject to temporary control (up to 12 months) if the following two conditions are met:

1) Not already controlled under the Act as Class A, B or C drugs.
2) The ACMD (Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs) has been consulted and determined it should be made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Offences committed under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 in relation to a temporary class drug are subject to what maximum penalties?

A

Indictment – 14 years and an unlimited fine.

Summarily – 6 months and a £5,000 fine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to establish joint possession?

A

Mere knowledge of the existence of drugs is not enough to prove an allegation of joint possession.

It is necessary to show that each defendant participated in the offence charged.

The prosecution may have to prove either that the drugs have come from a “pool” (R v Strong).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does quantity of a substance affect possession?

A

May be so small that the defendant could not possibly have known about it; therefore it could not be possessed.

Larger quantities may indicate PWIT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Possession of a controlled drug

A

s5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

In order to commit the offence of unlawful possession, a person must unlawfully have a controlled drug in [his/her] possession.

Penalties:

  • A: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 7 years.
  • B: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 5 years.
  • C: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 2 years.
  • Unlawful possession of cannabis can also be dealt with by issuing a PND for £90.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Certain defences can be raised by those accused of being in possession of controlled drugs….

A

s5(4) of the Misuse of Drugs Act

(a) That, knowing or suspecting it to be a controlled drug, he took possession of it for the purpose of preventing another from committing or continuing to commit an offence in connection with that drug and that as soon as possible after taking possession of it he took all such steps as were reasonably open to him to destroy the drug or to deliver it into the custody of a person lawfully entitled to take custody of it; or
(b) That, knowing or suspecting it to be a controlled drug, he took possession of it for the purpose of delivering it into the custody of a person lawfully entitled to take custody of it and that as soon as possible after taking possession of it he took all such steps as were reasonably open to him to deliver it into the custody of such a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Supplying explained…

A

Needs to be more than mere transfer of physical control from one person to another (R v Maginnis).

Other person being given it must derive some BENEFIT from being given the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can injecting others with that person’s own controlled drug amount to ‘supplying’?

A

No- but it may amount to an offence of ‘poisoning’ under s23 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Supplying a Controlled Drug

A

s4(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act

It is an offence to unlawfully…

(a) to supply or offer to supply a controlled drug to another (supply can even just mean passing a joint)
(b) to be concerned in the supplying of such a drug to another; or
(c) to be concerned in making an offer to supply a controlled drug to another

Other person being given it must derive some BENEFIT from being given the drug.

Penalties:

  • A: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = Life imprisonment.
  • B: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
  • C: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Offering to supply: does it have to be genuine?

A

No – access, nor possession needs to be in place, offence is still committed even if it was not a ‘real offer’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Possession of a controlled drug with intent to supply

A

s 5(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

It is an offence for a person to have a controlled drug in his possession, whether lawfully or not, with intent to supply it to another.

Penalties:

  • A: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = Life imprisonment.
  • B: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
  • C: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Suppling Articles for Administering or Preparing Controlled Drugs

A

s9A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

(1) A person who supplies or offers to supply

any article which may be used or adapted to be used (whether by itself or in combination with another article or other articles)…

…in the administration by any person of a controlled drug to himself or another,…

…believing that the article (or the article as adapted) is to be so used in circumstances where the administration is unlawful, is guilty of an offence.

(2) It is not an offence under subsection (1) above to supply or offer to supply a hypodermic syringe or any part of one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do hypodermic syringes count as part of s9A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971?

A

No- or any part of one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Far more serious than the simple possession of illegal drugs is the supply and distribution of them, and it is predominantly these suppliers who are the target of police operations.

There are a number of offences relating to the supply of illegal drugs, including some useful ‘catch all’ offences. The main offences covered here are:

A
  • Importation of controlled drug (s 3(1))
  • Production of a controlled drug (s 4(2))
  • Supplying a controlled drug (s 4(3))
  • Possession with intent to supply (s 5(3))
  • Cultivation of Cannabis (s 6)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Production of controlled drugs

A

s 4(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

(a) It is an offence to produce a controlled drug (or convert it from one class A to another) or
(b) to be concerned in the production of such a drug (doesn’t count just letting people use your kitchen for example).

Penalties:

  • A: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = Life imprisonment.
  • B: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
  • C: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 5 years.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cultivation of Cannabis

A

s6 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

(1) It shall not be lawful for a person to cultivate any plant of the genus cannabis.

Cultivate means things like watering it and feeding it, harvesting it when matured would be classified as production, not cultivation. Doesn’t matter in this offence if person knows its cannabis or not.

Penalties:

  • Indictment – 14 years and/ or a fine.
  • Summary – 6 months and/ or a fine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

General defence available under sXX of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 to a defendant charged with certain drug offences…

A

s28 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

  • It shall be a defence for the accused to prove that he neither knew of nor suspected nor had reason to suspect the existence of a controlled drug.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the main exceptions and conditions found in the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001?

A

Reg 4 – sets out which controlled drugs are exempt from main offences of importation/ exportation when they are in medicinal products.

Reg 5 – allowing people with license issued by Secretary of State to produce, supply, offer to supply or have in their possession a controlled drug.

Reg 6 – anyone who is lawfully in possession of controlled drugs to return it to whom they received it from. This includes police in line of duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Occupier or manager of premises used for controlled drug offences legislation

A

s8 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A person commits an offence if, being the occupier or concerned in the management of any premises, he knowingly permits or suffers any of the following activities to take place on those premises, that is to say—

(a) Producing or attempting to produce controlled drugs.
(b) Supplying or attempting to supply controlled drugs (or offering drugs);
(c) Preparing opium for smoking;
(d) Smoking cannabis, cannabis resin or prepared opium.

Penalties:

  • A: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
  • B: Summary offence = 6 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
  • C: Summary offence = 3 months, indictable offence = 14 years.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are Community Protection Notices?

A

Part 4 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

  • Can be issued by Police, local authority or provider of social housing to prevent anti-social behaviour.
  • Can be used for a variety of social behaviour including police to deal with places where drug offences take place.
  • Failure to comply can lead to fines and court orders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Assisting or Inducing Offence Outside United Kingdom

A

s20 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A person commits an offence if in the UK he assists in or induces the commission in any place outside the UK of an offence punishable under the provisions of a corresponding law in force in that place.

The offence must take place.

Penalties:

  • Indictment – 14 years and/ or a fine.
  • Summarily – 6 months and/ or a fine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Incitement

A

s19 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

It is an offence for a person to incite or attempt to incite another to commit an offence under any other provision of this Act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Importation of controlled drugs

Under what legislation are penalties stated to knowingly acquire possession or be concerned in transporting, storing or concealing drugs, or be concerned in any fraudulent evasion or attempted evasion of restriction?

A

s3 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Prohibits the import/ export of a controlled drug unless authorised by the regulations under the Act.

Customs and Excise Management 1979 Penalties:

  • A: Life Imprisonment
  • B: 14 Years Imprisonment
  • C: 14 Years Imprisonment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are Travel Restriction Orders?

A

The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 allows courts to impose travel restrictions on offenders convicted of drug trafficking offences and it has determined that a sentence of 4+ years is appropriate.

This means they cannot leave the UK at any time during the period beginning from custody release until the end of the order (minimum is 2 years and no maximum).

Possession of Class A with Intent to Supply is NOT COVERED.

26
Q

Contravening a Travel Restriction Order

A

s36 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001

(1) A person who leaves the United Kingdom at a time when he is prohibited from leaving it by a travel restriction order is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person who is not in the United Kingdom at the end of a period during which a prohibition imposed on him by a travel restriction order has been suspended shall be guilty of an offence

Penalties:

  • Indictment – 5 years and/ or a fine.
  • Summarily – 6 months and/ or a fine.
27
Q

The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Power to search and obtain evidence...
.
.
.
Power to execute a warrant to obtain evidence...
A

s23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

  • Constable has reasonable grounds to suspect that any person is in possession of a controlled drug.
  • Can detain for the purpose of the search.
  • Search any vehicle or vessel that the constable suspects could have drugs in it.
  • Cause that vehicle to stop for the purpose of a search.
    .
    .
  • A drugs warrant under s23 is now issued for a period of 1 month.
  • The magistrate must be satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting controlled drugs are present.
  • If not executed within that month then the officer must return to court.
  • It must specify what the officer wants to search specifically (premise only or persons on it).
28
Q

Offence of Obstruction

A

s23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

(4) A person commits an offence if he—
(a) Intentionally obstructs a person in the exercise of his powers under this section; or
(b) Conceals from a person acting in the exercise of his powers under subsection (1) above any such books, documents, stocks or drugs as are mentioned in that subsection; or
(c) Without reasonable excuse (proof of which shall lie on him) fails to produce any of the above when demanded to.

Penalties:

  • Indictment – 2 years and/ or a fine.
  • Summarily – 6 months and/ or a fine.
29
Q

Supplying, or Offering to Supply, a Psychoactive Substance

A

s5 Psychoactive Substances Act 2016

(1) A person commits an offence if—

(a) The person intentionally supplies a substance to another person,
(b) The substance is a psychoactive substance,
(c) The person knows or suspects, or ought to know or suspect, that the substance is a psychoactive substance, and
(d) The person knows, or is reckless as to whether, the psychoactive substance is likely to be consumed by the person to whom it is supplied, or by some other person, for its psychoactive effects.

(2) A person (“P”) commits an offence if—

(a) P offers to supply a psychoactive substance to another person (“R”), and
(b) P knows or is reckless as to whether R, or some other person, would, if P supplied a substance to R in accordance with the offer, be likely to consume the substance for its psychoactive effects.

Penalties:

  • Indictment – 7 years and/ or a fine.
  • Summarily – 6 months and/ or a fine.
30
Q

Supply of Butane Lighter Refill to Person Under 18

A

Reg 2 Cigarette Lighter Refill (Safety) Regulations 1999

No person shall supply any cigarette lighter refill canister containing butane or a substance with butane as a constituent part to any person under the age of 18.

No mention reasonably suspecting they’re under 18 or not.

Penalty:
- Summarily – 6 months and/ or a fine.

31
Q

Under what new legislation can cannabis based products be prescribed by doctors for medicinal use?

A

(SI 2018/1055 The Misuse Of Drugs (Amendments) (Cannabis and License Fees) Regulations 2018.

32
Q

Possession – No Knowledge Case Study:

Alan is walking into town with his friend Tim. Alan slips a bag of cannabis into Tim’s pocket without him seeing. As he is concerned they will get stopped. Tim never notices the bag of cannabis in his pocket and when they get to the pub Alan removes it.

Who was in possession?

A

Tim is never in possession of it. Alan was.

Tim had no knowledge it even existed = no possession. Alan was constantly in control of it.

*not talking about offences.

33
Q

Possession – No Knowledge Case Study:

Tim gives Ralph a tobacco pouch. Ralph believes the pouch contains loose tobacco. The pouch actually contains herbal cannabis.

Is ralph in possession?

A

Here, Ralph is in possession as he has been given it and is aware of that.

Doesn’t matter if he believes it something else.

34
Q

Joint Possession Case Case Study:

John and Tony have bought 20 ecstasy tablets. Both are planning to sell the drugs and profit from them. The drugs form a ‘common pool’ that both John and Tony can draw from. Both have ‘control of the tablets’.

Is this an example of joint possession?

A

Yes – both have access to and control of a ‘common pool’.

35
Q

Possession of a controlled drug defence examples –

5(4)(a) Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A
  • John finds a joint in his son’s room.
  • He recognises it as cannabis.
  • He takes it, to stop his son smoking drugs.
  • He flushes it down the toilet as soon as possible after finding it.
    OR
  • He drives to the local police station and hands it to the duty police sergeant.
36
Q

Possession of a controlled drug defence examples –

5(4)(b) Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A
  • Steve finds a bag of cannabis, by the kerb whilst walking to work.
  • He has no idea who it belongs to, so picks it up and places it in his pocket.
  • He walks to the local police state and hands it to the duty police sergeant.
  • This part does not include destruction and doesn’t know who it belongs to.
37
Q

Defence of Lack of Knowledge of a Key Element of Drug Offence Example–

s28 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A
  • Ted gives his girlfriend Mary a DVD in a case to give to Ralph.
  • In fact in the DVD case are 20 Joints of Cannabis.
  • Mary is unaware of this, Ralph is aware of this.
  • Mary hands the DVD case to Ralph and is arrested.

Mary possesses the cannabis and supplies them but her defence is two-fold:

  • Mary neither knew nor suspected the DVD case contained cannabis.
  • Mary neither knew nor suspected she was supplying drugs to Ralph.
38
Q

Defence of Lack of Knowledge As to the Drug Example–

s28 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A
  • Ted gives Sally a pot of what she believes is paracetamol.
  • Ted, in fact, has given Sally 10 paracetamol and 10 ecstasy tablets.

Sally knows it is a drug, but a legal one to possesses, her defence is that she did not know or believe it was ecstasy.

This defence does not exist though if someone believed it was one illegal drug and it was another (heroin but actually cocaine).

39
Q

Defence of Believing it to be Another Drug–

s28 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

A
  • Mary is prescribed Methadone from the Doctor for addictions.
  • Mary goes to collect it from the Pharmacist but a mistake happens and she is given psilocin instead.

Mary has a defence as she believes she is allowed to possess methadone but actually has been given another controlled drug (which she cannot lawfully have) by mistake.

40
Q

General Defences under s28 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 apply to what offences?

A
  • Unlawful possession/ supply / production
  • Possession with intent to supply
  • Unlawful cultivation of cannabis
  • Offences connected with opium
41
Q

Example of Supplying or Offering to Supply, a Psychoactive Substance

A

s5 Psychoactive Substances Act 2016

Sophia reads on the intent that the first food she gives her goldfish can produce hallucinations if consumed by humans. She tried it and experiences a trip. She calls her friend up and they all try it.

42
Q

Question: Jackson and Kevin are in a pub. Jackson is a drug user, Kevin is not. Jackson hands Kevin some of his drugs to hold whilst he shoots up in the toilet. Jackson comes back 5 minutes later and Kevin returns the drugs to him.

  1. Has Jackson ‘supplied’ the drugs to Kevin?
  2. Has Kevin ‘supplied’ the drugs to Jackson?
A
  1. Jackson has not supplied the drugs to Kevin because Kevin is NOT BENEFITTING from them. However, he would still be in possession of them.
  2. Kevin does supply the drugs to Jackosn and Jackson is a drug user and WILL BENEFIT by using them.
43
Q

Question: Lucas offers Stefan a kilo of Heroin for £5000. He says that he can bring it to him at the weekend but needs £2500 upfront. Stefan pays the money and agrees to meet him on Sunday. Lucas does not have the connections to buy drugs and has no intention of supplying Stefan with any drugs. He is planning to steal the money.

Has Lucas committed an offence of Offering to Supply a Controlled Drug?

A
  • Yes, he has.
  • An offer can be made through words or conduct.
  • It is irrelevant whether he has the drugs at hand or even whether the offer is genuine. One he makes the offer the offence is complete.
44
Q

Question: Marcus and Frank purchase 30 tablets of ecstasy. They go to a nightclub and Marcus holds all of the tablets. Whenever a potential buyer comes up, Frank takes the money to Marcus who in turn gives Frank the tablets who gives it to the buyer.

What offences have Marcus and Frank committed?

A
  • Both have committed the offence of Supplying a Controlled Drug.
  • They are in a joint enterprise when it comes to dealing the drugs. Even though their roles are somewhat different both play a key part.
45
Q

Question: Terry’s Grandmother Edith is looking after his flat whilst he is away. She lets his cat out and waters his plants. One of the plants Edith is watering is a cannabis plant. She has no idea of this and simply thinks it is an indoor fern.

Has Edith committed the offence of Cultivation of Cannabis?

A
  • Yes, Edith has committed an offence of Cultivation of Cannabis.
  • R v Champ 1981 states that you only need to show that the plant is cannabis and the defendant cultivated it (watering). You do not need to show they knew what it was.
  • Edith does have a defence but the question is asking if she has committed the offence which she has.
46
Q

Question: Lawrence is out walking and sees a variety of fungus that he knows contains psilocin (magic mushroom). He is on common land and the mushroom is growing wild. He puts it in his pocket and takes it home.

What offence has Lawrence committed?

A
  • Yes, Possession of a Controlled Drug.

- Has not got the defence of destroying it or taking it to a person who can lawfully handle it.

47
Q

Question: Steven is walking down the road with Jack. Steven hands Jack his rucksack whilst he goes into the shop to buy some cigarettes. Inside the rucksack, Steven has half a kilo of heroin. Jack has no reason to suspect there are drugs inside the bag.

Is Jack in ‘possession’ of those drugs?

A
  • Yes, Jack is in possession of the heroin.
  • The question is about ‘possession’ of an item, bot offences. He takes possession of the rucksack and he knows the rucksack contains items. Therefore he possesses those drugs.
48
Q

Question: Mo is standing in a pub with Adam. Whilst Mo is paying for a drink, Adam slips two wraps of Cocaine into Mo’s jacket pocket. Adam is aware that Mo will be searched going into the nightclub and will be arrested. Mo has no idea this has happened.

Is Mo in ‘possession’ of those drugs?

A
  • No, Mo is not.
  • Warner v Met 1969 outlined that a person cannot be in possession of something if he/she is completely unaware of its existence.
  • Mo has no idea that Adam has placed the drugs in his pocket therefore has no knowledge of possession.
49
Q

Question: Ralph’s mother is tidying his room, she finds in a drawer a bag of white powder that she suspects to be cocaine. Unsure, she decides to drive the bag to her friend Susan, who has a better understanding of drugs. She passes a police station on the way.

Has Ralph’s mother committed the offence of possession of a controlled drug? Does she have a defence?

A
  • Yes, his mother does commit the offence of possession.
  • She has not taken reasonable steps as soon as possible after taking possession of it.
  • She went to friends for verification rather than going to the police.
50
Q

Question: Sujad owns 42 Feeble Street. He rents it to his friend Michael whom he knows from school. Michael says to Sujad that he can grow some cannabis in the spare room to earn some money for them both. Sujad tells Michael that he doesn’t want to be involved but he can do what he wants.

Has Sujad committed an offence and if he has, what offence?

A
  • Yes, Sujad has committed the offence of being the manager of a premise permitting drug misuse (s8).
  • Even though he wants no part of it, he is permitting the growing of cannabis plants in his property and is therefore complicit.
51
Q

To prove possession, what are the two things you need to show?

A
  1. The person must have physical control of it (not necessarily on person).
  2. Must have knowledge of its presence.
52
Q

What are two aggravating factors for supplying a controlled drug?

A
  1. That the offence has been committed on school premises or in the vicinity.
  2. They used a ‘runner’ who was under 18.
53
Q

Question: Terry has cocaine but plans to turn it into crack cocaine using water and bicarbonate of soda. Terry is arrested for Production of a controlled drug but the solicitor argues that he will accept possession but not production as it is still Class A.

Is the solicitor correct?

A
  • No, he is not.

- Changing one type of Class A drug to another type of Class A drug has been held to be production (R v Russell 1991).

54
Q

Question: Steve, the landlord of a multi-occupancy house is having a coffee with his tenants. He says to them “if you ever want to smoke cannabis in the house, that is cool with me”.

Considering the offence of Occupier or Manager of a Premises that Permits Drug Misuse (s8), is the offence made out?

A
  • No, they actually need to smoke the cannabis for it be made out.
55
Q

Question: PC Harris is about to execute a warrant at an address. On arrival, the occupant opens the door and asks what the police want. Before PC Harris can answer the occupant takes a step forward and falls accidentally into the officer pushing him away from the door. The officer falls to the floor and because of the delay the drugs were flushed down the toilet.

Has the offence of ‘obstruction’ been made out?

A
  • No, if the fall was not intentional then obstruction is not made out.
56
Q

Question: It is an offence to supply any cigarette lighter refill canister containing butane or a substance with butane as a constituent part to any person under the age of 18.

What if the shop owner believes the person is over 18 but they’re actually 15?

A
  • It is irrelevant to the offence. The offence is still made out.
57
Q

Question: Kyle (19) asks him mum to buy him some specific plant food. The mum does. Kyle intends to use for the psychoactive effect.

Has Kyle’s mum committed the offence of supplying a psychoactive substance?

A

No, she does not suspect that the substance is a psychoactive substance.

58
Q

A Justice of the Peace may issue a warrant authorising a Police Officer to enter and search a premises for evidence of offences in relation to controlled drugs.

What must the court be satisfied that there is?

A

Reasonable grounds to SUSPECT any controlled drugs are in the possession of a person on any premises.

59
Q

PC Radleigh is on patrol when he sees a Silver Vauxhall Astra he recognises from briefing. It is linked to drugs and a young man called Sam. Sam is a known cannabis user. PC Radleigh however sees that the driver of the Vauxhall Astra is Sam’s father, a local fireman of good character. Suspecting that Sam may have left drugs in the car, he stops the vehicle.

Considering powers to stop and search vehicles section 23(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, was he right to stop the vehicle?

A

PC Radleigh has no right to stop the vehicle simply because he suspects the vehicle (not the occupants) has been used in connection with a drug offen

60
Q

St Jacks Hostel is used by homeless people under the age of 30 to stay warm. The hostel is managed by Stan, a former drug addict and three times a week he is assisted by volunteer Tony who completes some management tasks. One bitterly cold January morning, four homeless people are in the hostel lounge, Stan walks in and sees one of them smoking a cannabis joint and a second is preparing opium for smoking. Stan tells them that they cannot do that in the hostel but they say that they will have to go outside if he won’t allow them. Owing to the temperature he allows them both to continue what they are doing. As he leaves the room Tony turns up and he tells him what he is allowing them to do. Tony is not happy but says he won’t do anything and will wait in the kitchen until they are done.

Considering the offence of Occupier of Manager of a Premises Permitting Drug Misuse (Section 8 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971) who commits an offence and why?

A

Stan and Tony both commit the offence in these circumstances in relation to both the person smoking cannabis and the person preparing opium