Child Protection Flashcards
What are the two offences of abducting children?
Person connected with child (s1 Child Abduction Act 1984).
Person not connected with child (s2 Child Abduction Act 1984).
Child abduction – Person connected with child
s1 Child Abduction Act 1984
(1) A person connected with a child under the age of sixteen commits an offence if he takes or sends the child out of the United Kingdom without the appropriate consent.
(2) A person is connected with a child if they are a parent, guardian, person with residence order, a person with a custody order, or a person who whilst not married at the time of birth, has reasonable grounds to believe is the father.
DPP consent is required for prosecution.
Penalty:
- Summarily– 6 months and/ or fine.
- Indictment– 7 years and/ or fine.
Child abduction – Person connected with child
(3) In this section ’the appropriate consent’, in relation to a child, means—
s1 Child Abduction Act 1984
(a) The consent of each of the following—
(i) The child’s mother;
(ii) The child’s father, if he has parental responsibility for him;
(iii) Any guardian of the child;
(iiia) Any special guardian of the child;
(iv) Any person named in a child arrangements order as a person with whom the child is to live;
(v) Any person who has custody of the child; or
(b) The leave of the court granted under or by virtue of any provision of Part II of the Children Act 1989; or
(c) If any person has custody of the child, the leave of the court which awarded custody to him.
Child abduction – Person connected with child
Defences
(4) A person does not commit an offence under this section by taking or sending a child out of the United Kingdom without obtaining the appropriate consent if—
s1 Child Abduction Act 1984
- (a) He is a person named in a child arrangements order…and he takes…out of UK…LESS THAN ONE MONTH or,
(b) He is a special guardian of the child and he takes or sends the child out of the United Kingdom for a period of less than three months. - (a) He does it in the belief that the other person—
(i) Has consented; or
(ii) Would consent if he was aware of all the relevant circumstances; or
(b) He has taken all reasonable steps to communicate with the other person but has been unable to communicate with him; or
(c) The other person has unreasonably refused to consent.
Child abduction – Person connected with child
What is a special guardian?
Special Guardianship is an order made by the Family Court that places a child or young person to live with someone other than their parent(s) on a long-term basis.
Child abduction – Person connected with child
What is a child arrangements order?
Section 8(1) of the Children Act 1989 states that a child arrangements order means an order regulating arrangements relating to any of the following:
(a) With whom a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact, and
(b) When a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with any person.
Child abduction – Person not connected with child
s2 Child Abduction Act 1984
(1) A person commits an offence if, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, he takes or detains a child under the age of sixteen so as to keep/ remove him from the lawful control of any person having lawful control of the child.
- Does not apply to the father/mother (if married at the time of birth), the mother (if not married at the time of birth) or a guardian or person with residency order or custody of the child.
Child abduction – Person not connected with child
Defences
s2 Child Abduction Act 1984
…it shall be a defence for that person to prove—
(a) Where the father and mother of the child in question were not married/ civil partners to each other at the time of his birth—
(i) that he is the child’s father; or
(ii) That, at the time of the alleged offence, he believed, on reasonable grounds, that he was the child’s father; or
(b) That, at the time of the alleged offence, he believed that the child had attained the age of sixteen.
Child cruelty offence
s1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933
(1) If any person who has attained the age of sixteen years and has RESPONSIBILITY for any child or young person under that age, wilfully…
- assaults
- ill-treats (whether physically or otherwise)
- neglects
- abandons,
- exposes him, in a manner likely to cause him unnecessary suffering or injury to health (whether the suffering or injury is of a physical or a psychological nature),
or causes or procures him to be any of the above.
….that person shall be guilty of an offence.
Penalty:
- Summarily– 6 months and/ or fine.
- Indictment– 10 years and/ or fine.
The police have specific statutory powers to deal with the threat of significant harm posed to children.
What are these?
s46 Children Act 1989
Removal and accommodation of children by police in cases of emergency.
(1) Where a constable has reasonable cause to believe that a child (<18) would otherwise be likely to suffer significant harm, he may remove the child to suitable accommodation and keep him there; or prevent the child’s removal from any hospital or other place.
The child can remain in police protection for up to 72 hours and the police responsibility starts when the power is exercised.
Removal and accommodation of children likely to suffer significant harm by police in cases of emergency.
Where defines ‘harm’?
s31(9) Children Act 1989
“harm” means ill-treatment or the impairment of health or development including, for example, impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another.
“development” means physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development;
“health” means physical or mental health; and
“ill-treatment” includes sexual abuse and forms of ill-treatment which are not physical.
Considering s46 Children Act 1989, what is the longest amount of time a child can spend in police protection?
72 hours (s46(6))
Can an s46 power be exercised when the child is already subject to an Emergency Protection Order (EPO)?
Yes – where the constable has reasonable cause to believe that the child would otherwise be likely to suffer significant harm (compelling reasons).
s46 Children Act 1989
(3) As soon as is reasonably practicable after taking a child into police protection, the constable concerned shall—
(a) Inform the local authority within whose area the child was found of the steps that have been, and are proposed to be, taken with respect to the child under this section and the reasons for taking them;
(b) Give details to the authority within whose area the child is ordinarily resident (“the appropriate authority”) of the place at which the child is being accommodated;
(c) Inform the child (if he appears capable of understanding)—
(i) Of the steps that have been taken with respect to him under this section and of the reasons for taking them; and
(ii) Of the further steps that may be taken with respect to him under this section;
(d) Take such steps as are reasonably practicable to discover the wishes and feelings of the child;
(e) Secure that the case is inquired into by an officer designated for the purposes of this section by the chief officer of the police area concerned; and
(f) Where the child was taken into police protection by being removed to accommodation which is not provided
(i) By or on behalf of a local authority; or
(ii) As a refuge, in compliance with the requirements of section 51,secure that he is moved to accommodation which is so provided.
(4) As soon as is reasonably practicable after taking a child into police protection, the constable concerned shall take such steps as are reasonably practicable to inform—
(a) The child’s parents;
(b) Every person who is not a parent of his but who has parental responsibility for him; and
(c) Any other person with whom the child was living immediately before being taken into police protection,of the steps that he has taken under this section with respect to the child, the reasons for taking them and the further steps that may be taken with respect to him under this section.
Where a child has been taken into police protection, the designated officer shall allow:
46(10) Children Act 1989
- The Child’s parents
- Any person who is not a parent of his but who has parental responsibility for him
- Any person with whom the child was living immediately before being taken into police protection,
- Any person in whose favour a contact order is in force with respect to the child
- Any person who is allowed to have contact with the child bu virtue of an order under s34
- Any person acting on behalf of any of those people
…to have contact (if any) with the child, as is in the opinion of the designated officer, is both reasonable and in the child’s best interests