Misrepresentation - unfinished Flashcards
Misrepresentation - definition
“A false statement of fact or law which induces a person into a contract”
3 Types of misrepresentation
- Innocent
- Negligent under s.2 (1) Misrepresentation Act 1967
- Fraudulent
Action for misreprsentation - “If mere…
If mere representation turns out to be false but was used to induce a party then an action can lie under law of tort for misrepresentation
A representation must be a statement of fact - “Only a…
Only a false statement of fact will give rise to an action
Cases of opinions rather than a statement of fact
Mere opinion - Bisset v Wilkinson
Expert opinion - Esso petroleum v Mardon
Bisset v Wilkinson
- Claimant purchased land to use as a sheep farm
- estimated it would hold 2000 sheep
- Estimate was wrong and C brought and action of misrepresentation
Held:
- Statement was only one of an opinion, not of fact therefore not an actionable misrepresentation
Esso Petroleum v Mardon
- Mr Mardon entered into a tenancy agreement with esso in respect of a new petrol station
- Essos experts estimated station would sell 200,000 gallons of petrol
- Planning permission changed effecting the sales rate
- The estimate was not amended
- Station only sold 78,000 gallons with a loss of £5,800
Held:
- No action for misrepresentation as statement was estimate of future sales rather than one of fact.
- C was entitled to damages based on negligent misstatement at common law or breach of warranty of a collateral contract
Statement of opinion may amount to an actionable misrepresentation where.. (& case)
..the representor was in a position to know the facts
- (Smith v Land & House Property Corp)
Smith v Land & House Property Corp
- C purchased a hotel
- Seller described a tenant as “most desirable”
- Seller knew that the tenant was in arrears and on the verge of bankruptcy
Held:
- Statement was a statement of fact rather than an opinion as the seller was in a position to know the facts
Statements of future intent cannot amount to a misrepresentation unless.. (& case)
..the representor had no intention of carrying out the stated intent
- (Eddington v Fitzmaurice)
Eddington v Fitzmaurice
- C purchased some shares in D’s company
- Company stated shared were being offered in order to raise money to expand the company
- Company was actually in financial difficulty and the shares were going to be used to pay company debts
Held:
- Was an actionable misrepresentation as D had no intention of using the money to expand the company
False statement of law will now amount to an actionable misrepresentation - case
Pankhania v Hackney
Pankhania v Hackney
- C purchased property induced by representation that current occupiers were contractual licencees whose occupation could be terminated on giving 3 months notice
- Current occupant was actually protected under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
- Was a misrepresentation of law and claimants action was successful
Silence will generally not amount to a misrepresentation - Cases
Smith v Hughes
Walters v Morgan
Smith v Hughes
- C purchased quantity of what he thought were old oats
- Actually were new oats
- New oats were of no use to him
- Seller was aware of the mistake but said nothing
- C brought action based on mistake and misrepresentation
- Both actions failed
- Silence cannot amount to a misrepresentation