mini assessment 4 Flashcards
1-Glass Ionomer
2-type 1
3-type 2
4-type 3
5-type 4
6-type 5
7-type 6
1-almost tooth colored
- reaction between silicate glass powder & polyacrylic acid
- releases fluoride
- chemically bonds to tooth—ions between ionomer & tooth structure
2-cement
3-restorative material
4-liner or base
5-fissure sealant
6-orthodontic cement
7-core build up material
1-GI setting reaction
2-properties of GI
1-acid base reaction
- if material doesnt have reaction= not glass ionomer
- water is necessary for reaction—too much= material to be opaque w/ little strength
- –too light h20= cracking & crazing
2-coefficient of thermal expansion=like tooth
fluoride released
-bonds to tooth structure
-low thermal conductivity
-biocompatible
-not as esthetic as composite
-low resistance to wear
-low strength
1-Adhesion
1-GI chemically bonds to tooth structure
- bond strength is low but durable
- ion exchange process
- polyacrylic acid displaces phosphate & Ca…enters hydroxyapatite structure= Ca polyacrylate
- –Ca & Al are polyacrylates are formed at tooth
- –secondary bond w/ collaged w/in dentin via H2 bonding
- bond is improved by preconditioning= polyacrylic acid
- –conditioning= use of less ionized acid to remove smear layer
- –etching= stronger acid, etching uses tooth surface
1-fluoride release
2-indications for GI as restorative material
3-contraindication for GI as restorative material
1-released w/o affecting physical properties of material
-intial release is high but release dimishes—can be recharged w/ topical fluoride treatment
2-restoration of deciduous teeth
restoration of permanent teeth (anterior Class 3 or smooth surface Class 5)
3-restorations were there is a high load
large prep
cores when there is a little tooth remaining
where esthetics are of concern
1-RMGI Liquid
2-RMGI Powder
3-RMGI Reaction
4-stages in RMGI reaction
1-polyacrylic acid copolymer
- methacrylate
- photo initiator
2-fluoraluminosilicate glass powder
photo sensitizer
3-acid base reaction—if not supplied= not glass ionomer
-polymerization of resin
4-acid= base reaction—begins w/ mixing
light activation= takes palce at end of palcememnt w/in 10 sec of light activation
1-advantages of RMGI
2-disadvantages of RMGI
3-comparison of RMGI To GI
1-fluoride release
- early strength
- limited moisture sensitivity
- initial properties are better than those of GI
- can be finished immediately
- adhesive
2-polymerization shrinkage
- swelling of material= moisture uptake
- fully light cure for optimal properties= resin component, & depth of cure= considered
3-improved esthetics, H20 sensitivity = reduced
slightly less fluoride release
can be recharged w/ fluoride
inc in thermal expansion
inc polymerization shrinkage
1-indications for RMGI
2-contraindications of RMGI
1-restoration of smooth surface & anterior proximal restorations
- sandwich technique
- restoration of deciduous teeth
- blocking out of undercuts for indirect restorations
- lining of cavity prep
2-esthetics= chief concert
- direct placement over pulp
- core builds up where more than 50% of tooth is missing
comparison
1-resin composite
2-glass ionomer
3-resin modified
4-amalgam
1-esthetic, light cured, poly shrinkage
coefficient of thermal= greater than tooth
good wear resistance, no fluoride release
2-less esthetic, chemical cured, low shrinkage
coefficient of thermal= similar to tooth
low wear resistance, high fluoride release
3-more esthetic= conventional GI, but opaque
chemical & light cured
improved wear resistance
medium high fluoride release
4-not esthetic, not conservative, not technique sensitive
- no dimensional change upon setting
- no gap formation at gingival margin from poly shrinkage
1-fluoride release esthetics
1-resin comp—no fluoride release= esthetic= high mechanical properties
RMGI—fluoride release, med-high, rechargable= improved esthetics
GI—fluoride release, high, rechargable= not esthetic = low mechanical properties
1-esthetics necessary
2-fluoride release is desirable & esthetics doesnt matter
3-resin modified
4-esthetics isnt a concern but moisture & contamination= likely
1-resin composite
2-GI
3-less fluoride release but more esthetic & less technique sensitive
4-amalgam
1-resin composite prep
2-beveled margins
3-butt joint margin
1-extent is determined by caries -cavosurface margins---beveled= enamel margins butt joint (90 margin= dentin margin)
2-only enamel margins are beveled
- bevels can blend the resin composite restoration into tooth structure
- bevels dont prevent microleakage
- should be in .5-1.0 width
3-dentin/cementum margins arent beveled
- enamel margins arent beveled if bevel would remove thin layer of enamel
- cervical margins (no enamel) of smooth surface restorations= more microleakage than enamel margins
1-margins
2-enamel bevels
3-additional retention
1-enamel margins= beveled to blen the composite into tooth structure
- enamel margins can have long bevel to remove stained or unesthetic enamel or chalky decalcified
- margins apical to CEJ arent beveled= 90
- when little enamel then dont use bevel
2-enamel margins can be beveled
bevels are .5-1.0 but can be longer esthetics
bevels can be placed w/ finishing/diamond burs
3-retention grooves can be placed—in dentin
- –axioocclusal/incisal line angle
- –axiogingival/cervical line angle
- retention grooves are placed at axiogingival line angle in preps there are no enamel at cervical margin
- retention grooves can be placed if there are enamel margins, but arent required
- not at DEJ cause that would undermine enamel
- placed w/ 1/4 round bur in slow speed
1-retention
2-restoration w/ resin composite
1-grooves arent placed at DEJ (undermines enamel rods)
-retention grooves arent placed so that they would encroach upon pulp
2-etch= 30-40% phosphoric, remove smear layer, demineralize superficial dentin
- rinse= 10 sec
- remove excess moisture= collagen is able to be infiltrated w/ bonding agent
- apply bonding agent= 10 s w/ agitation= infiltration of demin dentin
- cure= 20 s w/ hybrid layer
- –retention= micromechanical
- –primarily from hybril layer= remaining collagen infiltrated w/ bonding agent
1-poly shrinkage
2-c factor
3-c factor ratio—occlusal
4-c factor ratio—smooth surface prep
1-resin composite materials shrink upon poly
- stresses from poly shrinkage can exceed bond strength
- when poly shrinkage exceeds the bond strength the result= gap formation & marginal leakage
- C factor= relationship between cavity config & shrinkage stress—higher C factor= bond disruption
2-# of bonded surfaces / # of unbonded surfaces of restoration
—greater the c factor, the greater the stresses at adhesive interfaces
1 bonded / 4 unbonded = .25= low
5 bonded/ 1 unbonded= 5= greater stress
3-5 bonded surfaces to 1 unbonded
unfavorable
causes stress
4-5 bonded surfaces to 1 unbonded surface
unfavorable
lower bond strength to cervical margin= no enamel
-if stress exceeds bond strength= gap formation—cervical margin where there is little/no enamel
1-strategies to minimize stress & gap formation
2-reduction of mraginal gap
3-surface sealants
4-RMGI
5-cavosurface margins for RMGI
1-incremental placement= smaller layers reduce bonded SA
- maximize non bonded SA
- minimize effect of C factor
2-surface sealant after finishing & polishing of restoration—may reduce microleakage but is dependent upon composite used & margin design
3-low viscosity, lightly filled, no O2 inhibited layer
etch, rinse, apply, thin w/ air, cure
4-pumice, shade selection (limited), isolation
5-GI/RMGI = brittle…requires bulk of material at margins
- additional retention grooves arent required isnce GI/RMGI adhere to tooth structure
- retention groove can be placed