milgrams obedience research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

who were the participants of milgrams study

A

40 american male volunteers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what were participants told the aim of the study was

A

a study on how punishment affects learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who were the confederates in milgrams baseline study

A

experimenter and another participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how did the two participants be assigned to role of teacher and learner

A

drew lots

this was rigged though as the real participant was always assigned the role of the teacher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the real participant required to do in the baseline study

A

test the learners ability to recall pairs of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happened each time a learner got an answer wrong

A

the teacher would administer an electric shock (fake) of increasing voltage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what voltage was the starting shock

A

15 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what intervals did the shocks go up in

A

15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what voltage was the maximum shock

A

450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

to add to the realism, what happened to the learner in the procedure

A

strapped in a chair by their arms in the room next to the door and a shock was demonstrated to the teacher to make it appear real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what would the learner do at 300 volts

A

bang on the wall and complained about how he couldnt continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what would the learner do at 315 volts

A

go silent so no further noises were heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how long was the experiment set to last

A

continued until either the participant refused to continue

OR

the maximum 450 volts was reached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what would happen if the teacher attempted to stop the experiment

A

experimenter would respond with verbal prods such as:

you have no choice but to continue, designed to coerce the teacher to continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how many participants delivered shocks up to 300volts

A

100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how many participants stopped at 300 volts

A

12.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

how many participants went to 450 volts

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what qualitative data did milgram also gather

A

observed signs of tension such as sweating and nail biting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what did milgram conclude

A

ordinary people are obedient to authority even when asked to behave in an inhumane manner, it is not evil who commit atrocities but ordinary obeying authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

which 3 factors affect obedience

A

proximity
uniform
location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

how did milgram investigate proximity

A

both teacher and learner were seated in the same room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what did obedience levels fall to when teacher and learner were in the same room

A

40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why did obedience levels drop when teacher and learner were in the same room

A

teacher was able to experience the learners pain more directly, if you are in far proximity you can psychologically distance yourself from the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what did obedience levels fall to if the experimenter gave orders over the phone

A

21%

some even continually gave the weakest shock level despite saying they was increasing it

25
Q

what happened in the touch proximity variation

A

learner would force teachers hand onto the shock plate

26
Q

what was the obedience levels in the touch proximity variation

A

30%

27
Q

where did milgrams studies take place

A

yale university

28
Q

what was significant about yale university

A

the location gave them confidence in the authority as it was prestigious

29
Q

where did milgram move the study to investigate the effects of location

A

run-down office

30
Q

what was the obedience levels when the study had been moved to the office

A

47.5%

31
Q

why does location effect obedience

A

prestigious locations gives the study legitimacy of authority in the eyes of participants which the experimenter shares

32
Q

how did milgram investigate uniform

A

experimenter removed their lab coat and replaced with someone wearing normal clothes

33
Q

what did obedience levels drop to in the uniform variation

A

20%

34
Q

why does uniform effect obedience

A

uniform encourages obedience as they are widely recognised as symbols of authority

35
Q

what was the procedure of bushmans study

A

a female researcher dressed as either:
a police woman
a business woman
a beggar

stopped people in the street and told them to give change to a male researcher

36
Q

what were the obedience levels in bushmans study

A

police uniform - 72%
beggar - 52%
business - 48%

37
Q

why did participants say they obeyed the most towards the police uniform

A

had the most authority

38
Q

how conducted supporting research for milgrams study

A

hofling

39
Q

what does hoflings study suggest about milgrams

A

high ecological validity

40
Q

what type of experiment was hoflings

A

field experiment

41
Q

what did hofling find

A

21/22 nurses obeyed an unknown doctor’s telephone instruction to administer drugs over the prescribed limit to a patient

42
Q

what did hofling conclude

A

the power and authority of doctors was a greater infuence on the nurse’s behaviour than basic hospital rules

43
Q

what does hoflings study suggest about why we obey

A

strong argument supporting proximity as a valid reason for obedience, as well as having high ecological validity as real life hospital setting

44
Q

what is the opposing evidence for situational factors affecting obedience

A

milgram didnt investigate all factors, culture may be more important

45
Q

what did kilham and mann find in relation to culture and obedience

A

replicated Milgram’s shock paradigm in Australia and found that only 16% of the ppts
shocked the learner at 450v compared to Milgram’s 65% obedience rate

46
Q

what did mantell find in relation to culture and obedience

A

85% obedience rate when the study was replicated in
Germany

47
Q

what does this cross cultural comparison show

A

different societies demonstrate different levels of obedience

48
Q

what does cultural obedience research tell us about society

A

societies follow different hierarchical structures where
children are socialised from a young age to be more (or less) obedient

49
Q

what does culture suggest about the original situational factors investigated by milgram

A

while situational factors like uniform and proximity are important, culture may play a more significant role in obedient behaviour

50
Q

what is an alternative explanation for obedience

A

dispositional

51
Q

which researcher suggests dispositional factors are more important than situational

A

adorno

52
Q

what did adorno find in relation to dispositional factors

A

high levels of obedience was as a result of growing up in an authoritarian family with strict parenting generating an obedient personality

53
Q

how does adornos research link to milgrams

A

higher levels of authoritarianism in the ppts in milgrams study that obeyed until the end

significant differences between obedient and defiant participants consistent with the authoritarian personality

54
Q

what does the dispositional explanation of obedience mean for situational factors

A

suggests that it may be a more important contributor in why people obey or likely that situational variables work with dispositional variables in the real world

55
Q

how does milgrams research into situational variables have real life application

A

anti war crimes

56
Q

what do kelman and hamilton suggest

A

the My Lai massacre (in 1968) where a group of US soldiers killed the 500 inhabitants of a Vietnamese village claiming they were simply obeying the orders of a Lieutenant, can be understood in terms of the power hierarchy of the US Army, including the role of uniform

57
Q

what does the my lai massacre demonstrate

A

people will blindly follow
orders from an individual with higher perceived authority which can be demonstrated through uniform and institutional hierarchies

58
Q

what does the my lai massacre mean for obedience research

A

theory has practical value in the real world and situational factors influence behaviour