Midterm Lecture Flashcards
D:Deviance
A recognized violation of a social norm.
D: Relativist
●Relativism challenges the notion of absolute, universal standards of deviance.
- it posits that norms – and consequently, deviations from those norms – are situational and context-dependent.
- This means what is considered deviant in one situation or culture might not be viewed the same way in another.
- how are norms socially constructed across contexts
D: Malum in se
wrong or evil in itself (an essentialist view)
D: Malum prohibitum
wrong because it is prohibited; unlawful by virtue of statute
(a relativist view)
(failure to abide by norms)
What are key features of the Relativist view of deviance?
Time-dependent
Culture-dependent
Situation-dependent
Howard Becker and his theory
- Has a relativist approach that deviance is socially constructed
- Social response to the act (who imposes norms on others? How and why?)
- deconstructs functionalist approach
Barbara Costello and her theory
- Cultural relativism is not productive
- empirical view (based on observation or experience)
- deviance needs to focus on crimes that have victims (behaviour that causes damage)
- Did a GSS survey: discovered people were more concerned with behaviours that have victims than those who don’t
- If behaviours are all relative/culturally dependent, how can we punish them?
D: Cultural relativism
position that there is no universal standard to measure cultures by, all cultures and beliefs must be understood relative to their cultural context, and not judged based on outside norms and values
Critiques of Costello
- Gap between theory and empirical analysis
- Claims that the study of deviance should focus on crime
- Then she uses empirical example which is sexual behaviors (not criminal) so already there is a jump between where she starts and where she goes - Lack of cross-cultural comparisons
- She rejects cultural relativism by saying there’s no difference between cultures
- But to support this claim, she brings evidence from 1 source only which is GSS
and a survey only done in the US → No cross-cultural comparison, not
convincing - Only one case study
- Makes a whole theoretical argument on this one study looking at sexual
behaviors
- Problematic to only use one case study and draw conclusions
- Needs a lot more research
- But she argues this is evidence to develop an entire theory
Is homosexuality really normative?
- Does society no longer see homosexuality as deviant since there is no victim? - 73% of respondents said they found homosexuality as wrong
- This figure has changed over time
- This does NOT support her argument that deviance is always involving a victim - “Facts” and cultural diversity
- Is homosexuality normative? - cultures evolve and change overtime - what is considered a crime/norm fluctuates and is not static - Lack of historical insight
Overall:
- we must consider contextual and cultural differences in how societies define deviance
- societies are interested in policing behaviours that don’t have victims
William Sumner
Deviance is the recognized violation of social norms
MORES: norms that carry great importance in our lives
- substantial social sanctions often grounded in formal laws
FOLKWAYS: norms for routine and casual daily interaction
- lesser social sanctions
- breaking these have less consequences
Difference:
MORES distinguishes between what society considers as good or bad
FOLKWAYS distinguishes between politeness and rudeness
D: Ethnomethodology
The study of the methods and norms used to produce social order
researchers that study these norms are ethnomethodologists (like Borat!)
D: Breaching experiments
- Daily life experiments seeking to examine people’s reactions to the violation of norms
- Ethnomethodologists partake in these to observe reactions (ie breaking rules of games, bargaining in the supermarket)
- allows us to see simple unwritten rules that make our everyday lives up that we don’t actively think about
Theological (Demonological Approaches)
Fatalistic approach: Idea that since these people can’t control behaviours - no point in educating them
Assumes no criminal responsibility: source is external
- dominant until 18th century
- people commit behaviours due to possession by demons or Satan
- ## make body uncomfortable so demon leaves
Classical Approaches
Cesare Beccaria (1764)
- new philosophy for deviance - people are rational and have full control over their behaviours (should be accountable)
- began in 18th century - influenced by Enlightenment when people were understood to be sensible
Goal of Punishment is deterrance
- punishment should be severe to deter crime
Jeremy Bentham
- believed punishment should be swift, certain, severe
ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY
Classical and Theological comparison
- Neither considers personality, education, opportunities, etc.
- no hypothesis that can be tested, just philosophy about human nature that is just accepted
- these are philosophies of belief rather than scientific theories
Neo-Classical approaches: Rational choice theory
individuals make rational informed decisions when they engage in deviant behaviours
- does benefit outweigh cost?
Cohen and Felson: Routine Activity theory
- suggests that people are more likely to commit crime under 3 factors
1. motivated offender
2. suitable target
3. absense of a clear punishment
Problems with rational choice approaches?
Assumption of lack of impulsivity
- many people commit crimes impulsively
- large sanctions don’t deter offenders
- non-criminal deviance? (sexual, mental, substance)
- Ignores social factors related to crime
Biological Approaches
Early Biological positivism: relationship between physical characteristics and criminality
Frantz Joseph Gall:
(phrenology) the structure of skulls can tell us about deviance and personality
Cesare Lombroso:
studied bodies of prisoners and found similar characteristics (ape-like) idea that they were less evolved
- atavism: physiologial resemblance to earlier stages in human evolution
- correlational (maybe specific types were targeted more by police?)
William Sheldon: Constitutional theories
Found 4 basic body types correlated to specific qualities
1. Endomorph - overweight person (tend to be tolerant, friendly, laidback, lazy, selfish)
2. Mesomorph - athletic and muscular (more risktakers, competitive)
3. Ectomorph - thin and fragile (introverted and artistic)
4. Balanced Type - average build, no special traits
- said mesomorphs most likely to commit crimes
- while yes certain body types are linked to criminality (more likely to be charged) this is more likely due to their socio-economic standing
Biolgical explanations are based on
- chemical imbalance
- hormones
- genetics
Modern Biological Explanations
Chemical imabalance
Hypoglycemia: low blood sugar = decreases moral judgement
- limited empirical support
- “Twinkie Defence” - too much sugar leads to decrease in judgement as cop kills mayor
Genetics and crime
- criminal family trees - researchers tried to show that people had familial connections to crime
-eugenics: sterilize people to end crime (family line carries criminality) - can be taught, not born with criminal capabilities
- “Supermale syndrome” - extra Y chromosome (overepresented in prisons)
- relationship between genes and behaviour is not clear
Neuropsychological factors
Fetal alcohol syndrome: children show reduced judgement, poor social skills
ADHD: show difficulties in learning (associated with delinquency)
- however these labels could create stigma - leading to crime committal
Sociobiology (evolutionary psychology)
- attempt to revive biological explanations with psychological factors
The Cinderella Hypothesis (Daly and Wilson): step children who live with biological parents more likely to be abused - evolutionary (parents programmed to protect genes)
- questionable evidence
Critiques of: Why Men Rape (sociobiology)
- distort what feminist scholars are saying - yes there is a sexual/reproductive element to rape (but has to do with other elements also)
- there is no evidence for genetic or psychological mechanisms which lead to rape
- no evidence rape increases reproduction
- Extrapolation from lower species: jumping to scorpion flies to human beings is a huge jump
- Is rape really universal?: the authors claim that rape is in human nature because it is universal. However, there are large differences in rape rates between different cultures
- men loved this paper cuz it takes personal responsibility away from them
Alternative findings for young women rape explanations
Main reason: Young women are actively dating younger men, and younger men are the main perpetrators of rape
- many victims are very young
- studies suggest suffering is not varied by age groups
Ali, Naylor - “Intimate Partner Violence: A Narrative Review”
- attempt to understand what causes IPV
Biological reasons: Head injuries, testosterone/seratonin, genetics
Physiological: mental health, attachment theory (needs not met in childhood), self-esteem issues, communication skills, substance abuse. - not conclusive - more research is needed
Ali, Naylor - “Intimate Partner Violence: A Narrative Review”
- attempt to understand what causes IPV
Biological reasons: Head injuries, testosterone/seratonin, genetics
Physiological: mental health, attachment theory (needs not met in childhood), self-esteem issues, communication skills, substance abuse. - not conclusive - more research is needed
Psychological Explanations
Major motivational element here is personality (personality deficiency, abnormality, dysfunction etc.)
Focus on individuals - individualistic theories
- began with Freud and the development of psychoanalysis and human behaviour and personality theories