Midterm I (Sep 3-Sep 24) Flashcards
drugs of abuse
- act at specific target (NT receptors, transporters, related enzymes, pathways, etc)
- > may have one or multiple targets but do not disrupt neuronal function in a universal or non-specific way
- initially, users attracted to rewarding aspect but eventually take the drug just to feel normal
- chronic use causes changes to neuronal circuitry, brain structure, connections
SUD (Substance Use Disorder)
- substances separated into different drug disorders ( cocaine, alcohol, etc), each composed of 11 criteria from 4 categories (impaired control, social impairment, risky use and pharmacological indicators (tolerance, withdrawal)
- severity depends on number or criteria (mild-2/3, moderate-4/5, severe-6+)
Addiction
long lasting, relapsing condition used to describe the most sever chronic stage of SUD; facilitated by changes in brain structure and neurochem, usually a result of escalating use, may involve pre-disposing qualities
-3Cs (Consequences, Control loss, Compulsive drug seeking and abuse)
What is the tipping point btw casual use and addiction?
usually some form of tolerance and dependence
stages of addiction
- binge and intoxication
- withdrawal and negative affect
- craving, preoccupation and anticipation
binge and intoxication
- involves basal ganglia, structure associated w reward pathway
- DA release signals reward + euphoria, triggers pavlov. response and starts forming anticipatory associations to cues (ex. white powder, a room)
- drug taking as an unusual form of learning and mem
withdrawal and negative affect
- extended amygdala, also hippocampus
- DA sensitivity decreases, tolerance increases, natural rewards release insufficient DA to stimulate the pathway; as a result, judgement of other stimuli is altered and the antireward effect sets in (when not taking the drug, the feeling of dysphoria and the stress response push you to take more to stop feeling so awful)
Craving, preoccupation and anticipation
- PFC, which controls executive functions (self reg, decision making, assignment of value, error monitor, etc) should normally weigh options and filter out primitive urges
- surges of DA can also flood the PFC though, impairing DA and Glu signaling and making it hard to filter and send out appropriate signals to avoid consequences
- results in difficulty to resist strong urges or to follow through w decisions
tolerance
taking higher doses of the drug without feeling effects OR needing more drug to get the desired effects
- users may become tolerant to desired side effects (high) but not undesired (side) effects due to differential changes in receptors or other drug targets (ex. chron. opiod users may dev. tolerance to vomiting but not constipation)
- users can die bc the doses they take trigger dangerous side effects to which tolerance has not developed (ex. cardiovascular deaths in cocaine abuse)
dependence
- physically/psychologically unwell when not taking drugs (ex. tired or sleepy in absence of stimulant)
- state that occurs after using drug so frequently and consistently that it becomes difficult to function without it
- typically occurs after tolerance starts, but both processes are linked
how are tolerance and dependence related?
Adaptation; as the brain tries to maintain homeostasis, it will change NT pathways and other physiol. responses
pharmacodynamic tolerance
- sensitivity of neurons to the drug changes with chronic use, usually due to changes in NT receptors or transporters
- may see a cross-tolerance btw drugs of the same class if they act at the same targets (ex. tol. to one opiod often results in tol to most)
- responsible for most withdrawal effects when the drug is removed
effect of stimulants on neurochemistry
- stimulant generally causes excess NT release and therefore excess neurotransmission
- brain reduces number of receptors, moving activity back to an acceptable range of normal functioning (pharmacodynamic tolerance)
- in absence of drug, levels of that NT in the brain are greatly reduced, leading to dysphoria (withdrawal)
effect of sedatives on neurochemistry
sedative usually cause insufficient NT release, which lowers neural activity
- brain increases number of receptors to restore normal functioning (pharmacological tolerance)
- in absence of the drug, the brain is overly sensitive to the NT (withdrawal)
- this is especially dangerous as it can lead to seizure
drug disposition/metabolic tolerance
-chronic use of some drugs results in increased metabolism or excretion, typically due to increased activity or lvl of enzymes in liver (ex. ethanol tolerance due to up-regulation of liver enzymes and alternative metabolic pathways, allowing increased removal of ethanol from the blood)
physical dependence
- the longer and more intense the drug use, the greater the probability that the brain will change to compensate (ex. opiod use causes constipation, the body upregulates other mechanisms to pass food through the GI, withdrawal can lead to diarrhea)
- once adaptive changes occur in the body, the user needs to keep using the drug to prevent withdrawal symptoms resulting from uncompensated adaptive change
psychological dependence
- drugs that are reinforcing (stimulate reward pathway when taken) tend to produce psych. dependence, which manifests s compulsion or perceived need for use
- also linked to changes in brain in response to drug use
- long lasting changes in specific brain regions result in craving and relapse after quitting
- powerful driving force behind repeated drug use
genetic factors of addiction
- genetic factors (specific differences in genes) account for ~50% of the risk for addiction
- twin studies: monozyg. twins have more sim. r8s of addiction than dizyg. twins
- adoption studies: kids more likely to have habits of birth than adopted family
- env. (culture, stress, peers, family, attitudes) also plays a role in risk
- epigenetics (changes in gene expression) thought to play larger role, esp. in long-lasting neuroplasticity associated w addition (in animal studies, epigen. changes can be pass to offspring and affect their responses to drugs)
“candidate” gene approach
- initially thought we could find a link btw variations in genes considered important for abuse (based on pre-exisiting knowledge) and drug abuse/dependence
ex. genes for DAT (DA transporter protein), DRD2 (DA receptor D2), OPRM1 (mu opiod receptor) - results are confusing and often contradictory, suggesting that no one change in a gene makes you susceptible to a drug
genome-wide association studies (GWAS)
compare as many genes as possible btw dependent vs non-dependent subjects; no prior suspicions necessary as results will show differences at any genetic location present and reduced bias
- shows addiction is highly polygenic
- unexpectedly, few genes thought important a priori were identified; rather, many were from genes involved in neuronal adhesion (important in neuroplasticity), suggesting drug dependence may be a learning problem
- certain genes show up in several diff. studies suggesting overlap btw those responsible for susceptibility to diff drugs of abuse
major routes of administration
- mouth
- injection
- inhalation
- insufflation (snorting)
bioavailability
the fraction of administered drug that ends up in the circulation: by definition, 100% for IV, but can be significantly less for other routes
oral administration
- simple, easy, no training required
- drugs taken orally must be able to pass through cells lining gut (usually only lipid soluble, neutral drugs can be absorbed)
- drugs poorly absorbed fr GI have low bioavailability
- in order to take effect, the drug must make it through the intestines, liver, R heart, lungs, and L heart before the brain
- slowest; time lag means drugs swallowed can be slightly less addictive
- some may be completely metabolized by enzymes in liver (ctyochrome P450 “CYP” enzymes/gut before
- drug continues circulating to the liver and will eventually be cleared from the body
intravenous (IV) injection
- drug is delivered directly into the bloodstream, less diffusion
- rapid onset with 100% of the dose available in the plasma
- rate of injection affects peak height (conc of drug in brain)
- control and deliver high concentrations
- blood vessels rel. insensitive to irritants so can inject drugs that contain contaminants (ex. crushed pills that would eventually cause necrosis via IM/subQ injection), but veins will eventually collapse
- collateral health risks (HIV, hep, bacteria)
- when done correctly, drug will bypass liver, go directly to R heart then L heart then brain
Instramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SubQ) injection
- drug absorption depends on diffusion through tissue and removal by local blood flow
- IM absorption more rapid because of better blood supply, but both typically faster than oral
- > most rapid IM in deltoid, intermediate in thigh, lowest in glutes (due to differences in blood supply)
- advantages of IM over subQ are larger volumes (less bubbling) and less chance of irritation (necrosis)
inhalation
- drug gets to brain a couple seconds faster than IV because it bypasses the R heart, going from the lungs to thee L heart to the brain
- lungs have huge surface area for absorption and the blood vessels there take u p the drug very quickly
- bypasses first pass metabolism
- dosage is harder to control, but experienced users learn to titrate drug delivery (ex. smokers tend to take fewer puffs of cigarettes with high nic levels)
- includes smoking and huffing
alternative routes of administration
- transdermal, rectal, vaginal (ex. alcohol-soaked tampon); can bypass liver if done right
- eyeball shots (holding liquor to the eye; just corrodes the outer layer)
- snorting cocaine (dissolves in and absorbed by mucous membranes in nose), chewing tobaccos (nic absorbed by oral cavity mucosa); both avoid first pass liver metabolism
Administration routes and abuse potential
the faster a drug reaches the brain and the higher the concentration delivered, the greater the abuse potential
ex. heroin, a derivative is a modified version of morphine designed to reach the brain faster, and has a greater abuse potential
- oral amphetamines have mod potential, smokeable methamphetamine has a very high potential
- crack, a cheap smokeable version of cocaine, has a very high potential
- hallucinogens have v low abuse potential and cause little physiological damage
pharmacokinetics-ADME
-absorption
-distribution
-metabolism
-excretion
most drugs either removed from system by metabolism in the liver, excretion (via intestines, kidney, lungs, sweat glands) or a combination
-some drugs are bound to proteins in the blood that render them inert, some are not metabolized extensively and excreted unchanged
dose-response curves
- sigmoidal
- describe relationship btw amt of drug in system and response if produces, or the percentage of the population it affects
- note there is a max response for any given effect at a certain dose, beyond which no more effects can be measured
TD50
toxic dose, or conc of the drug that’s toxic to 50% of users
ED50
effective dose, or conc that produces the desired effect in 50% of users
TI
therapeutic index, TD50/ED50
- the bigger the difference, the farther apart those two curves lie
- gives rel. info regarding safety (ex. if TI dose is 2, the deadly/toxic dose is only 2x the effective dose (dangerous))
- note that TI values can drop dramatically if other drugs are present*
reinforcement
a behavioural event followed by a consequent event such that the drug behaviour is then more likely to be repeated
drugs as reinforcers
- strength of reinforcing property correlates strongly with addiction potential of drugs
- drugs can hijack the reward pathway to promote drug taking behaviours
- in animal models, the more reinforcing the drug, the harder the animal will work to get it
extinction
reducing the drug-seeking behaviours to zero by removing the reward (drug)
models for reinstatement
- measure vulnerability to relapse into drug abuse
- animals trained to self administer, behaviour then extinguished by discontinuing drug delivery, seeking behaviour eventually dissipates
- test which stim cause animal to reinstate drugg-seeking or administering behav even tho no drug available
- > found the same things cause reinstatement in humans (stress, small dose, cues)
conditioned place-preference
can tell us whether a drug had a reinforcing, euphoric effect or an aversive one
-animal is trained to associate one chamber w the drug; they are then placed in a anteroom btw a neutral chamber and the drug associated chamber and studying where it spends most time can tell us the effect of the drug
in-vivo microdialysis
- sterotaxic surgery is used to precisely implant a probe at a specific region or structure within an animal brain
- brain fluid is sucked out to capture NT release, artificial CSF pumped back in
- can monitor release of DA and other NTs, by analyzing content of CSF under diff conditions (ex. learn that while exercise stims animal reward pathway, the strongest nat stim in mice is mating)
- measurement of chems given as % of the baseline signal
- poor time res (sampling captures release over mins rather than secs); might miss some info
Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry
- measures a change in NT conc (as oppposed to % of baseline)
- fine time res (seconds rather than minutes)
- probe inserted with sterotaxic surgery
- apply voltage down the probe; it strips electrons off DA (oxidizing it) and we can then measure the number of electrons to indirectly assess DA release