Midterm Exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Complaint

A

Probable cause a crime was committed
Probable cause that that person committed the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus

A

Criminal act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mens Rea

A

Culpable mental state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Most crimes need?

A

Actus Reus
Mens Rea
Concurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strict Liability

A

Only Actus Reus necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mens Rea Test

A
  1. Cannot presume that if drafters left out Mens rea it means that they did not want it as part of the statute
  2. Malum in se v. Malum prohibita (Malum in se = inherently evil needs Mens rea)
  3. Public health - less need for Mens rea
  4. How much harm is done to the public
  5. “Strict liability”
  6. Legislative history
  7. How easy to prove intent
  8. Opportunity to ascertain true facts
  9. The # of prosecutions expected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Specific intent

A

“With intent to…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General intent

A

Any other charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Inchoate Crimes

A

Incomplete Crimes
1. Attempt
2. Conspiracy
3. Solicitation
4. Aiding and abetting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attempt

A

Substantial step
V.
Preemptory conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conspiracy

A

Agreement to commit a crime
Some jurisdictions require furtherance
To get out you may have to undue, report, or notify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Solicitation

A

Persuading another person to commit a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aiding and Abetting

A

Natural and probable consequence
Some jurisdictions requires co-defendants to have the intent to commit the crime
Some jurisdiction only require co-defendants to have intent to aid and abet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Should we prosecute?

A
  1. Law enforcement priorities
  2. Nature and seriousness of the offense
  3. Deterrent effect
  4. Person’s culpability
  5. Criminal history
  6. Willingness to cooperate
  7. Personal circumstances
  8. Probable sentence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Plea bargaining

A

Prosecutors are allowed to “coerce” defendants by taking larger sentences off the table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Jury Nullification

A

Cannot be a jury instruction
No solicitation of jury nullification

17
Q

Federal Jurisdiction

A

Federal land
FDIC banks
Cross state lines
Indian lands (concurrent with tribe)
Interstate commerce (realistic probability)

18
Q

Interstate commerce

A

“Realistic probability”

19
Q

State jurisdiction

A

Over the person
Over the crime
Over the geography

State has jurisdiction of citizens on the high seas

20
Q

When can states have jurisdiction over crimes committed in other states?

A

“Substantial effect” on that state

21
Q

Indian jurisdiction

A

Tribe only have jurisdiction over misdemeanors
Jurisdiction over tribal land
Must be a member of the tribe
live on the land
enrolled in the tribe
take part in ceremonies

22
Q

Ex post facto

A
  1. A law that makes an action done before its passing illegal after its passing
  2. A law that aggravates a crime (makes it worse)
  3. A law that increases the punishment
  4. A law that alters the rules of evidence to allow more or less testimony
23
Q

Void for vagueness

A

Vagrancy and loitering laws
Cannot figure out what is legal versus illegal

24
Q

First amendment

A

Chilling effect on free speech

25
Q

Void for uncertainty

A

Whether the language of a statute may not only apply to the particular act but also to a radically different one as well.
Left for conjecture

26
Q

Nuisance

A

State can regulate behavior or land that is considered a nuisance
Can regulate behavior if it is a burden to society

27
Q

Racial discrimination test

A
  1. Presence of disparate impact
  2. Historical context of legislation
  3. Legislative history
  4. Departure from normal legislative process
28
Q

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt

A

Burden of proof is on the prosecution unless it is an affirmative defense

29
Q

Affirmative defense

A

Only need to prove reasonable doubt

30
Q

Burden of the state

A

Prove every element of a crime

31
Q

Presumption of possession

A

As long as it is not the sole and sufficient basis for a finding of guilt
“More likely than not”

32
Q

Double Jeopardy

A

Cannot be tried twice for the same crime

33
Q

Due process retroactivity

A

Precedent cannot change a law ex post facto if it is unreasonable

34
Q

Textualism

A

Plain meaning of the word
Scalia

35
Q

Purposive or Intentionalism

A

Look at legislative history and other sources

36
Q

Strict construct

A

Strict reading of the statute

37
Q

Legislative Purpose

A

Statute does not need to be the narrowest meaning